Phenomenology as a Resource for Patients
Open accessAbstract
Patient support tools have drawn on a variety of disciplines, including psychotherapy, social psychology, and social care. One discipline that has not so far been used to support patients is philosophy. This paper proposes that a particular philosophical approach, phenomenology, could prove useful for patients, giving them tools to reflect on and expand their understanding of their illness. I present a framework for a resource that could help patients to philosophically examine their illness, its impact on their life, and its meaning. I explain the need for such a resource, provide philosophical grounding for it, and outline the epistemic and existential gains philosophy offers. Illness often begins as an intrusion on one's life but with time becomes a way of being. I argue that this transition impacts on core human features such as the experience of space and time, human abilities, and adaptability. It therefore requires philosophical analysis and response. The paper uses ideas from Husserl and Merleau-Ponty to present such a response in the form of a phenomenological toolkit for patients. The toolkit includes viewing illness as a form of phenomenological reduction, thematizing illness, and examining illness as altering the ill person's being in the world. I suggest that this toolkit could be offered to patients as a workshop, using phenomenological concepts, texts, and film clips to reflect on illness. I conclude by arguing that examining illness as a limit case of embodied…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Carel (2012) developed a phenomenological toolkit meant for use in a healthcare context, to support patients to cultivate new existential relationships to and understandings of their condition, bracketed off from purely medical meanings.
“Carel (2012) developed a phenomenological toolkit meant for use in a healthcare context, to support patients to cultivate new existential relationships to and understandings of their condition, which are bracketed off from purely medical meanings.”
From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Carel, 2012
Cites
Gallagher, S. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199271941.001.0001 · Cited by 3,311 · see citing works
Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2007) · doi:10.4324/9780203086599 · Cited by 1,512 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life
Chapman, R., & Carel, H. (2022) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12456 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationPantazakos, T., & Vanaken, G.-J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1225152 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Phenomenology scholarship provides several toolkits for recording an individual’s experience in a clinical context and/or a context of disablement or psychopathology (Parnas et al., 2005; Carel, 2012; Schmidt, 2018).”
Background
- Authors
- Carel, H.
- Affiliations
- University of the West of England (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Carel, H.
- ORCID
- Carel, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-04-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-113
- ISSN
- 0360-5310 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5019
- OpenAlex
- W2007433700
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Bristol
- Durham University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- Keywords
- phenomenology, illness, patient support, Edmund Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, phenomenological reduction, thematization, embodied existence, meaning of illness, existential reflection
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Disease, Humans, Philosophy, Medical, Social Support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review