Cited by 173Music Therapy and HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMusic Education and Analysis

Is Music Therapy an Effective Intervention for Dementia? A Meta-Analytic Review of Literature

Koger, S. M., Chapin, K., Brotons, M.·1999·Journal of Music Therapy

Abstract

A recent qualitative review of literature in the area of music/ music therapy and dementias published since 1985 suggested that music/music therapy is an effective intervention for maintaining and improving active involvement, social, emotional and cognitive skills, and for decreasing behavioral problems of individuals with dementias (Brotons, Koger, & Pickett-Cooper, 1997). The present analysis sought to update and quantify this relationship, and investigate the extent to which methodological variables influenced treatment effectiveness. Twenty-one empirical studies, with a total of 336 subjects suffering from symptoms of dementia, were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the effect of music/music therapy was found to be highly significant. A homogeneity analysis determined that the effect sizes were not consistent across studies; thus, a series of moderating variable analyses were conducted. We were unable to determine the source of variability between studies by analyzing type of therapeutic intervention (active or passive), music (live or taped), therapist's training (trained music therapist vs. other professional), dependent variable (behavioral, cognitive, or social), or length of treatment. Although the published literature demonstrates that music/music therapy is an effective method overall for treating symptoms of dementia, systematic variation of treatment protocols is necessary to identify the underlying mechanisms and delineate the most effective techniques.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jmt/36.1.2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A metaanalysis of 21 empirical studies with a total of 336 subjects found the overall effect of music to be highly significant for maintaining and improving active involvement, social, emotional and cognitive skills, and for decreasing negative behaviors.

    “A metaanalysis of 21 empirical studies with a total of 336 subjects found the overall effect of music to be highly significant for maintaining and improving active involvement, social, emotional and cognitive skills, and for decreasing negative behaviors. 59”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koger, S. M., Chapin, K., & Brotons, M.
Affiliations
Willamette University (US)
Corresponding author
Koger, S. M.
Venue
Journal of Music Therapy
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
2-15
ISSN
  • 0022-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-7395
OpenAlex
W2062944931
Cited by
173
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Music Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
Keywords
music therapy, dementia, treatment effectiveness, behavioral problems, cognitive function, social skills, music therapy education, treatment duration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review