Cited by 120Coffee research and impactsNeural dynamics and brain functionSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 17 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

L-Theanine and Caffeine in Combination Affect Human Cognition as Evidenced by Oscillatory alpha-Band Activity and Attention Task Performance

Open access
Kelly, Simon P., Gomez-Ramirez, Manuel, Montesi, Jennifer L., Foxe, John J.·2008·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Recent neuropharmacological research has suggested that certain constituents of tea may have modulatory effects on brain state. The bulk of this research has focused on either L-theanine or caffeine ingested alone (mostly the latter) and has been limited to behavioral testing, subjective rating, or neurophysiological assessments during resting. Here, we investigated the effects of both L-theanine and caffeine, ingested separately or together, on behavioral and electrophysiological indices of tonic (background) and phasic (event-related) visuospatial attentional deployment. Subjects underwent 4 d of testing, ingesting either placebo, 100 mg of L-theanine, 50 mg of caffeine, or these treatments combined. The task involved cued shifts of attention to the left or right visual hemifield in anticipation of an imperative stimulus requiring discrimination. In addition to behavioral measures, we examined overall, tonic attentional focus as well as phasic, cue-dependent anticipatory attentional biasing, as indexed by scalp-recorded alpha-band (8-14 Hz) activity. We found an increase in hit rate and target discriminability (d') for the combined treatment relative to placebo, and an increase in d' but not hit rate for caffeine alone, whereas no effects were detected for L-theanine alone. Electrophysiological results did not show increased differential biasing in phasic alpha across hemifields but showed lower overall tonic alpha power in the combined treatment, similar to previous findings at a larger dosage of L-theanine alone. This may signify a more generalized tonic deployment of attentional resources to the visual modality and may underlie the facilitated behavioral performance on the combined ingestion of these 2 major constituents of tea.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a four-day repeated-measures study, combined L-theanine (100 mg) and caffeine (50 mg) improved visuospatial attention performance and reduced tonic alpha-band EEG power relative to placebo. Caffeine alone improved discriminability but not hit rate, while L-theanine alone at this lower dose produced no significant behavioral or tonic-alpha effects.

Key findings

  • The combined treatment increased hit rate and target discriminability relative to placebo; the hit-rate improvement was about 3%, and the discriminability effect size was larger for the combination (Cohen’s d = 0.55) than for caffeine alone (d = 0.42).
  • Caffeine alone improved discriminability relative to placebo but did not improve hit rate; no treatment affected reaction time.
  • L-theanine alone at 100 mg produced no significant behavioral effects and did not significantly lower tonic alpha, unlike prior findings at 250 mg.
  • Tonic alpha power was significantly lower for the combined treatment than placebo; the alpha cueing effect was smaller for caffeine alone than placebo, but not for L-theanine alone or the combination.

Methods

  • Sixteen neurologically normal paid volunteers (5 female; ages 21–40, mean 27.5 years) completed four counterbalanced testing days, receiving placebo, 100 mg L-theanine, 50 mg caffeine, or both combined, with task runs beginning 30 min after ingestion.
  • Participants performed a cued visuospatial attention task requiring covert shifts to left or right locations and discrimination of target versus standard stimuli, while continuous EEG was recorded from 164 scalp electrodes plus EOG.
  • Behavioral analyses used hit rate, false alarm rate, discriminability index, and reaction time; EEG analyses examined tonic alpha amplitude before cue onset and lateralized anticipatory alpha after cue onset using temporal spectral evolution.

Limitations

  • The authors caution that synergy between L-theanine and caffeine cannot be strongly claimed because only single doses were tested and the combined condition did not differ significantly from caffeine alone on tonic alpha.
  • The authors note that alpha effects of both compounds appear dose-dependent and call for future dose-response characterization; the caffeine-alone alpha reduction did not reach significance (P = 0.18).
  • The unexpected reduction in the alpha cueing effect for caffeine alone is described as needing replication; more generally, the small sample and single-dose design limit generalization.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/138.8.1572s

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

16 Own result · 9 No full text of the sources · 8 Own method · 8 Own interpretation · 1 Supported so far · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 25 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 9
18 of 18
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A typical serving of tea contains roughly 100 mg L-theanine and 50 mg caffeine.

    “An immediate question, given this replication, is whether this tonic alpha reduction occurs at lower dosages of L-theanine, closer to the amount ingested through a typical serving of tea.In the present study, we administered a lower dosage of 100 mg to address this.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    L-theanine and caffeine are tasteless when dissolved in water.

    “Both theanine and caffeine are tasteless in water solution.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Metadata

Authors
Kelly, S. P., Gomez-Ramirez, M., Montesi, J. L., & Foxe, J. J.
Affiliations
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Foxe, John J.
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
138
Issue
8
Pages
1572S-1577S
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1955323883
Cited by
119
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
theanine, caffeine, tea constituents, visuospatial attention, alpha activity, anticipatory attention, attentional deployment, combination supplementation, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention, Brain Mapping, Caffeine, Cognition, Cues, Drug Therapy, Combination, Electroencephalography, Female, Glutamates, Humans, Male, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review