Cited by 41Iron Metabolism and DisordersInfant Nutrition and HealthChild Nutrition and Water Access

Iron Absorption Is Greater from Apo-Lactoferrin and Is Similar Between Holo-Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate: Stable Iron Isotope Studies in Kenyan Infants

Open access
Mikulic, Nadja, Uyoga, Mary A, Mwasi, Edith, Stoffel, Nicole U, Zeder, Christophe, Karanja, Simon, Zimmermann, Michael B·2020·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Background Whether lactoferrin (Lf) binds iron to facilitate its absorption or to sequester iron from potential enteropathogens remains uncertain. Bovine Lf is added to many infant formulas, but previous studies in infants reported that Lf had no effect on or inhibited iron absorption. The effects of the apo (iron-free) or the holo (iron-loaded) forms of Lf on iron absorption are unclear.Objectives Our objective was to compare iron absorption from a maize-based porridge containing: 1) labeled ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) alone; 2) labeled FeSO4 given with bovine apo-Lf; and 3) intrinsically labeled bovine holo-Lf.Methods In a crossover study, we measured iron absorption in Kenyan infants (n = 25; mean ± SD age 4.2 ± 0.9 months; mean ± SD hemoglobin 109 ± 11 g/L) from maize-based test meals containing: 1) 1.5 mg of iron as 54Fe-labeled FeSO4; 2) 1.42 mg of iron as 58Fe-labeled FeSO4, given with 1.41 g apo-Lf (containing 0.08 mg iron); and 3) 1.41 g holo-Lf carrying 1.5 mg iron as 57Fe. The iron saturation levels of apo- and holo-Lf were 0.56% and 47.26%, respectively primary outcome was fractional iron absorption (FIA), assessed by erythrocyte incorporation of isotopic labels.Results The FIA from the meal containing apo-Lf + FeSO4 (geometric mean, 9.8%; -SD and +SD, 5.4% and 17.5%) was higher than from the meals containing FeSO4 (geometric mean, 6.3%; -SD and +SD, 3.2% and 12.6%; P = 0.002) or holo-Lf (geometric mean, 5.0%; -SD and +SD, 2.8% and 8.9%; P <0.0001). There was no significant difference in FIA when comparing the meals containing holo-Lf versus FeSO4 alone (P = 0.24).Conclusions The amount of iron absorbed from holo-Lf was comparable to that of FeSO4, and the addition of apo-Lf to a test meal containing FeSO4 significantly increased (+56%) iron absorption. These findings suggest that Lf facilitates iron absorption in young infants. Because Lf binds iron with high affinity, it could be a safe way to provide iron to infants in low-income countries, where iron fortificants can adversely affect the gut microbiome and cause diarrhea. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03617575.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/nxaa226

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transferrin and lactoferrin have been implicated in nutritional immunity by iron sequestration from invading pathogens, with evidence that lactoferrin can increase iron absorption by 56%.

    “Transferrin and lactoferrin have been implicated in nutritional immunity by iron sequestration from invading pathogens, with evidence that lactoferrin can increase iron absorption by 56% [46-48].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]2. Baker HM, Baker EN. A structural perspective on lactoferrin function. Biochem Cell Biol 2012;90(3):320-8.
  2. [11]11. Lonnerdal B. Iron in human milk and cow's milk-effects of binding ligands on bioavailability. In Lonnerdal B, editor. Iron metabolism in infants. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1990;87-107.
  3. [41]41. Baker HMand Baker EN. A structural perspective on lactoferrin function. Biochem Cell Biol 2015;90:320-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mikulic, N., Uyoga, M. A., Mwasi, E., Stoffel, N. U., Zeder, C., Karanja, S., & Zimmermann, M. B.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (KE)
Corresponding author
Mikulic, Nadja
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
150
Issue
12
Pages
3200-3207
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3083499910
Cited by
41
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
lactoferrin, iron absorption, apo-lactoferrin, ferrous sulfate, iron stable isotopes, erythrocyte iron incorporation, infant formula, iron deficiency, iron saturation, hemoglobin, anemia
MeSH terms
Biological Transport, Female, Ferrous Compounds, Humans, Infant, Iron, Iron Isotopes, Kenya, Lactoferrin, Male, Milk, Human, Cross-Over Studies, Infant Formula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review