The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase II Trial of Taxol, an Active Drug in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
Abstract
Taxol, an antimicrotubule agent, has shown promise for efficacy in treatment of breast cancer, but severe hypersensitivity reactions led to cessation of many phase I clinical trials. Consequently, investigators and the National Cancer Institute recommended that phase I and II studies of this agent use 24-hour infusions and antiallergic medications. Using a premedication regimen effective in preventing hypersensitivity reactions, we have performed a phase II trial of taxol in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Taxol was administered to 25 patients at a dose of 250 mg/m 2 by 24-hour infusion every 21 days. These patients had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen, either adjuvant to surgery or for metastatic disease; all but two had received doxorubicin. In 60% of the patients, the dominant site of disease was the viscera. All patients were assessable. In April 1991, at a median time on study of 9 months (range, 5–13+months), the objective response rate was 56% (12% complete and 44% partial; 95% confidence interval, 35%–76%). Disease progressed in only 8% of the patients. The median number of courses of therapy was 11. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxic effect, but neutropenia with fever occurred in only 5% of 232 courses. A chronic glove-and-stocking neuropathy developed in most patients, but no altergic reactions occurred. We conclude that taxol is an active agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and that it warrants continued study. Currently, we are conducting a phase I trial of taxol plus doxorubicin. Future trials should address the optimal effective dose, the optimal sequencing of combinations, mechanisms of drug resistance in tumors, and dose-limiting toxic effects (particularly cardiac toxic effects of taxol given as a single agent or in drug combinations).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cisplatin in cancer therapy: Molecular mechanisms of action
Dasari, S., & Bernard Tchounwou, P. (2014) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.025 · Cited by 5,537
Rowinsky, E. K., & Donehower, R. C. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199504133321507 · Cited by 1,924
Nagata, Y., Lan, K.-H., Zhou, X., Tan, M., Esteva, F. J., Sahin, A. A., Klos, K. S., Li, P., Monia, B. P., Nguyen, N. T., et al. (2004) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.022 · Cited by 1,858
Bear, H. D., Anderson, S., Brown, A., Smith, R., Mamounas, E. P., Fisher, B., Margolese, R., Theoret, H., Soran, A., Wickerham, D. L., et al. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.12.005 · Cited by 1,118
Protein nanoparticles as drug carriers in clinical medicine
Hawkins, M. J., Soon-Shiong, P., & Desai, N. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.044 · Cited by 779
Metadata
- Authors
- Holmes, F. A., Walters, R. S., Theriault, R. L., Buzdar, A. U., Frye, D. K., Hortobagyi, G. N., Forman, A. D., Newton, L. K., & Raber, M. N.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-12-18
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1797-1805
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W4255152173
- Cited by
- 746
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II Trial of Taxol, an Active Drug in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/83.24.1797-a
- The paper
- Holmes, F. A., Walters, R. S., Theriault, R. L., Buzdar, A. U., Frye, D. K., Hortobagyi, G. N., Forman, A. D., Newton, L. K., & Raber, M. N. (1991). Phase II Trial of Taxol, an Active Drug in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/83.24.1797-a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.