The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changing views of the role of matrix metalloproteinases in metastasis
Abstract
Metastatic spread of cancer continues to be the greatest barrier to cancer cure. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of metastasis is crucial for the design and effective use of novel therapeutic strategies to combat metastases. One class of molecules that has been repeatedly implicated in metastasis is the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In this review, we re-examine the evidence that MMPs are associated with metastasis and that they make a functional contribution to the process. Initially, it was believed that the major role of MMPs in metastasis was to facilitate the breakdown of physical barriers to metastasis, thus promoting invasion and entry into and out of blood or lymphatic vessels (intravasation, extravasation). However, recent evidence suggests that MMPs may have a more complex role in metastasis and that they may make important contributions at other steps in the metastatic process. Studies using intravital videomicroscopy, as well as experiments in which levels of MMPs or their inhibitors (tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases [TIMPs]) are manipulated genetically or pharmacologically, suggest that MMPs are key regulators of growth of tumors, at both primary and metastatic sites. On the basis of this evidence, a new view of the functional role of MMPs in metastasis is presented, which suggests that MMPs are important in creating and maintaining an environment that supports the initiation and maintenance of growth of primary and metastatic tumors. Further clarification of the mechanisms by which MMPs regulate growth of primary and metastatic tumors will be important in the development of novel therapeutic strategies against metastases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer
Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81333-1 · Cited by 4,919
KiSS-1, a Novel Human Malignant Melanoma Metastasis-Suppressor Gene
Lee, J.-H., Miele, M. E., Hicks, D. J., Phillips, K. K., Trent, J. M., Weissman, B. E., & Welch, D. R. (1996) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/88.23.1731 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9 · Cited by 29,219
Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to pericellular cue
Toole, B. P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1391 · Cited by 2,125
MMP-9 Supplied by Bone Marrow–Derived Cells Contributes to Skin Carcinogenesis
Coussens, L. M., Tinkle, C. L., Hanahan, D., & Werb, Z. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00139-2 · Cited by 1,306
Danhier, F. (2016) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.11.015 · Cited by 1,288
Matrix metalloproteinases: they're not just for matrix anymore!
McCawley, L. J., & Matrisian, L. M. (2001) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00248-9 · Cited by 1,274
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chambers, A. F., & Matrisian, L. M.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-09-03
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1260-1270
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2104692426
- Cited by
- 1,588
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing views of the role of matrix metalloproteinases in metastasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/89.17.1260
- The paper
- Chambers, A. F., & Matrisian, L. M. (1997). Changing views of the role of matrix metalloproteinases in metastasis. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/89.17.1260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.