The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dose and Dose Intensity as Determinants of Outcome in the Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both total dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy are postulated to be important variables in the outcome for patients with operable breast cancer. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 8541 examined the effects of adjuvant treatment using conventional-range dose and dose intensity in female patients with stage II (axillary lymph node-positive) breast cancer. METHODS: Within 6 weeks of surgery (radical mastectomy, modified radical mastectomy, or lumpectomy), 1550 patients with unilateral breast cancer were randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms: high-, moderate-, or low-dose intensity. The patients received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil on day 1 of each chemotherapy cycle, with 5-fluorouracil administration repeated on day 8. The high-dose arm had twice the dose intensity and twice the drug dose as the low-dose arm. The moderate-dose arm had two thirds the dose intensity as the high-dose arm but the same total drug dose. Disease-free survival and overall survival were primary end points of the study. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 9 years, disease-free survival and overall survival for patients on the moderate- and high-dose arms are superior to the corresponding survival measures for patients on the low-dose arm (two-sided P<.0001 and two-sided P = .004, respectively), with no difference in disease-free or overall survival between the moderate- and the high-dose arms. At 5 years, overall survival (average +/- standard error) is 79% +/- 2% for patients on the high-dose arm, 77% +/- 2% for the patients on the moderate-dose arm, and 72% +/- 2% for patients on the low-dose arm; disease-free survival is 66% +/- 2%, 61% +/- 2%, and 56% +/- 2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Within the conventional dose range for this chemotherapy regimen, a higher dose is associated with better disease-free survival and overall survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures
Peto, R., & Peto, J. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344317 · Cited by 3,393
Cited by
Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.2.218 · Cited by 1,465
Hershman, D. L., Shao, T., Kushi, L. H., Buono, D., Tsai, W. Y., Fehrenbacher, L., Kwan, M., Gomez, S. L., & Neugut, A. I. (2011) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1132-4 · Cited by 870
Obesity and Cancer: A Current Overview of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Outcomes, and Management
Pati, S., Irfan, W., Jameel, A., Ahmed, S., & Shahid, R. K. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15020485 · Cited by 677
HER2 and Response to Paclitaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer
Hayes, D. F., Thor, A. D., Dressler, L. G., Weaver, D., Edgerton, S., Cowan, D., Broadwater, G., Goldstein, L. J., Martino, S., Ingle, J. N., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa071167 · Cited by 608
Self-citationAdjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Muss, H. B., Berry, D. A., Cirrincione, C. T., Theodoulou, M., Mauer, A. M., Kornblith, A. B., Partridge, A. H., Dressler, L. G., Cohen, H. J., Becker, H. P., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810266 · Cited by 554
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Budman, D. R., Berry, D. A., Cirrincione, C. T., Henderson, Wood, W. C., Weiss, R. B., Ferree, C. R., Muss, H. B., Green, M. R., Norton, L., & Frei, E.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-08-19
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1205-1211
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2136802843
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose and Dose Intensity as Determinants of Outcome in the Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/90.16.1205
- The paper
- Budman, D. R., Berry, D. A., Cirrincione, C. T., Henderson, Wood, W. C., Weiss, R. B., Ferree, C. R., Muss, H. B., Green, M. R., Norton, L., & Frei, E. (1998). Dose and Dose Intensity as Determinants of Outcome in the Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.16.1205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.