Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modification of Clinical Presentation of Prostate Tumors by a Novel Genetic Variant in CYP3A4

Open access
Rebbeck, Timothy R., Jaffe, Julie M., Walker, Amy H., Wein, Alan J., Malkowicz, S. Bruce·1998·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Background: Pathways involved in androgen metabolism have been implicated in the etiology of prostate cancer. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of CYP3A4, a gene associated with the oxidative deactivation of testosterone, on the clinical presentation of prostate cancers. Methods: A polymerase chain reaction-based approach was used to identify sequence variants of the human CYP3A4 gene. To ascertain whether allelic variants of the CYP3A4 gene were associated with tumor stage and grade and age of the patient at diagnosis, we determined CYP3A4 genotypes in 230 Caucasian men with incident prostate cancer. Results: We identified a novel genetic variant (CYP3A4-V) that has an altered 5′ regulatory element, containing an A to G mutation, upstream of the CYP3A4 gene. We then compared clinical characteristics of prostate cancers in men who did and did not carry this variant. The presence of the CYP3A4-V allele was associated with a higher tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) stage and Gleason grade. The association between CYP3A4 genotype and tumor stage was most pronounced in men diagnosed at a relatively old age who reported no family history of prostate cancer. In this group, 46% of men with stage T3/T4 tumors carried CYP3A4-V, whereas only 5% of individuals with stage T1 tumors carried CYP3A4-V (adjusted odds ratio = 9.45; 95% confidence interval = 2.54–35.17; x2 1 = 12.28; two-sided P<.001). Conclusions: We determined that a single base change in the 5′ flanking region of the CYP3A4 gene was associated with higher clinical stage and grade in men with prostate tumors. Our results suggest that mutations in the CYP3A4 gene may influence prostate carcinogenesis. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90: 1225-9]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/90.16.1225

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Rebbeck, T. R., Jaffe, J. M., Walker, A. H., Wein, A. J., & Malkowicz, S. B.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1998-08-19
Volume
90
Issue
16
Pages
1225-1229
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W4244900749
Cited by
360
References
0
FWCI
16.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modification of Clinical Presentation of Prostate Tumors by a Novel Genetic Variant in CYP3A4. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/90.16.1225
The paper
Rebbeck, T. R., Jaffe, J. M., Walker, A. H., Wein, A. J., & Malkowicz, S. B. (1998). Modification of Clinical Presentation of Prostate Tumors by a Novel Genetic Variant in CYP3A4. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.16.1225

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.