The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modification of Clinical Presentation of Prostate Tumors by a Novel Genetic Variant in CYP3A4
Open accessAbstract
Background: Pathways involved in androgen metabolism have been implicated in the etiology of prostate cancer. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of CYP3A4, a gene associated with the oxidative deactivation of testosterone, on the clinical presentation of prostate cancers. Methods: A polymerase chain reaction-based approach was used to identify sequence variants of the human CYP3A4 gene. To ascertain whether allelic variants of the CYP3A4 gene were associated with tumor stage and grade and age of the patient at diagnosis, we determined CYP3A4 genotypes in 230 Caucasian men with incident prostate cancer. Results: We identified a novel genetic variant (CYP3A4-V) that has an altered 5′ regulatory element, containing an A to G mutation, upstream of the CYP3A4 gene. We then compared clinical characteristics of prostate cancers in men who did and did not carry this variant. The presence of the CYP3A4-V allele was associated with a higher tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) stage and Gleason grade. The association between CYP3A4 genotype and tumor stage was most pronounced in men diagnosed at a relatively old age who reported no family history of prostate cancer. In this group, 46% of men with stage T3/T4 tumors carried CYP3A4-V, whereas only 5% of individuals with stage T1 tumors carried CYP3A4-V (adjusted odds ratio = 9.45; 95% confidence interval = 2.54–35.17; x2 1 = 12.28; two-sided P<.001). Conclusions: We determined that a single base change in the 5′ flanking region of the CYP3A4 gene was associated with higher clinical stage and grade in men with prostate tumors. Our results suggest that mutations in the CYP3A4 gene may influence prostate carcinogenesis. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90: 1225-9]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zanger, U. M., & Schwab, M. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007 · Cited by 4,169
Rebbeck, T. R., Devesa, S. S., Chang, B.-L., Bunker, C. H., Cheng, I., Cooney, K., Eeles, R., Fernandez, P., Giri, V. N., Gueye, S. M., et al. (2013) · Prostate Cancer · doi:10.1155/2013/560857 · Cited by 273
Self-citationPlatz, E. A., & Giovannucci, E. (2004) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.10.002 · Cited by 180
McClintock, M. K., Conzen, S. D., Gehlert, S., Masi, C., & Olopade, F. (2005) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/60.special_issue_1.32 · Cited by 88
Expression of cytochrome P450 3A4 and its clinical significance in human prostate cancer
Fujimura, T., Takahashi, S., Urano, T., Kumagai, J., Murata, T., Takayama, K., Ogushi, T., Horie-Inoue, K., Ouchi, Y., Kitamura, T., et al. (2009) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.033 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Rebbeck, T. R., Jaffe, J. M., Walker, A. H., Wein, A. J., & Malkowicz, S. B.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-08-19
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1225-1229
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W4244900749
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modification of Clinical Presentation of Prostate Tumors by a Novel Genetic Variant in CYP3A4. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/90.16.1225
- The paper
- Rebbeck, T. R., Jaffe, J. M., Walker, A. H., Wein, A. J., & Malkowicz, S. B. (1998). Modification of Clinical Presentation of Prostate Tumors by a Novel Genetic Variant in CYP3A4. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.16.1225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.