Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 626

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Body Mass Index and Risk of Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagus and Gastric Cardia

Chow, Wong-Ho, Blot, William J., Vaughan, Thomas L., Risch, Harvey A., Gammon, Marilie D., Stanford, Janet L., Dubrow, Robert, Schoenberg, Janet B., Mayne, Susan T., Farrow, Diana C., Ahsan, Habibul, West, A. Brian, Rotterdam, Heidi, Niwa, Shelley, Fraumeni, Joseph F.·1998·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incidence rates have risen rapidly for esophageal adenocarcinoma and moderately for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma, while rates have remained stable for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and have declined steadily for noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma. We examined anthropometric risk factors in a population-based case-control study of esophageal and gastric cancers in Connecticut, New Jersey, and western Washington. METHODS: Healthy control subjects (n = 695) and case patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 589) were frequency-matched to case patients with adenocarcinomas of esophagus or gastric cardia (n = 554) by 5-year age groups, sex, and race (New Jersey only). Classification of cases by tumor site of origin and histology was determined by review of pathology materials and hospital records. Data were collected using in-person structured interviews. Associations with obesity, measured by body mass index (BMI), were estimated by odds ratios (ORs). All ORs were adjusted for geographic location, age, sex, race, cigarette smoking, and proxy response status. RESULTS: The ORs for esophageal adenocarcinoma rose with increasing adult BMI. The magnitude of association with BMI was greater among the younger age groups and among nonsmokers. The ORs for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma rose moderately with increasing BMI. Adult BMI was not associated with risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing prevalence of obesity in the United States population may have contributed to the upward trends in esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinomas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/90.2.150

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 626

Metadata

Authors
Chow, W.-H., Blot, W. J., Vaughan, T. L., Risch, H. A., Gammon, M. D., Stanford, J. L., Dubrow, R., Schoenberg, J. B., Mayne, S. T., Farrow, D. C., Ahsan, H., West, A. B., Rotterdam, H., Niwa, S., & Fraumeni, J. F.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1998-01-21
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
150-155
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2172032259
Cited by
626
References
1
FWCI
25.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body Mass Index and Risk of Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagus and Gastric Cardia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/90.2.150
The paper
Chow, W.-H., Blot, W. J., Vaughan, T. L., Risch, H. A., Gammon, M. D., Stanford, J. L., Dubrow, R., Schoenberg, J. B., Mayne, S. T., Farrow, D. C., Ahsan, H., West, A. B., Rotterdam, H., Niwa, S., & Fraumeni, J. F. (1998). Body Mass Index and Risk of Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagus and Gastric Cardia. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.2.150

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.