The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Screening mammography is the best method to reduce mortality from breast cancer, yet some breast cancers cannot be detected by mammography. Cancers diagnosed after a negative mammogram are known as interval cancers. This study investigated whether mammographic breast density is related to the risk of interval cancer. METHODS: Subjects were selected from women participating in mammographic screening from 1988 through 1993 in a large health maintenance organization based in Seattle, WA. Women were eligible for the study if they had been diagnosed with a first primary invasive breast cancer within 24 months of a screening mammogram and before a subsequent one. Interval cancer case subjects (n = 149) were women whose breast cancer occurred after a negative or benign mammographic assessment. Screen-detected control subjects (n = 388) were diagnosed after a positive screening mammogram. One radiologist, who was blinded to cancer status, assessed breast density by use of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. RESULTS: Mammographic sensitivity (i.e., the ability of mammography to detect a cancer) was 80% among women with predominantly fatty breasts but just 30% in women with extremely dense breasts. The odds ratio (OR) for interval cancer among women with extremely dense breasts was 6.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.95-19.4), compared with women with extremely fatty breasts, after adjustment for age at index mammogram, menopausal status, use of hormone replacement therapy, and body mass index. When only those interval cancer cases confirmed by retrospective review of index mammograms were considered, the OR increased to 9.47 (95% CI = 2.78-32.3). CONCLUSION: Mammographic breast density appears to be a major risk factor for interval cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Berg, W. A. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.18.2151 · Cited by 1,526
Microwave Imaging for Breast Cancer
Nikolova, N. (2011) · IEEE Microwave Magazine · doi:10.1109/mmm.2011.942702 · Cited by 640
Tamimi, R. M., Byrne, C., Colditz, G. A., & Hankinson, S. E. (2007) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djm062 · Cited by 258
Hsu, J. C., Naha, P. C., Lau, K. C., Chhour, P., Hastings, R., Moon, B. F., Stein, J. M., Witschey, W. R. T., McDonald, E. S., Maidment, A. D. A., et al. (2018) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c8nr03741h · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Mandelson, M. T.
- Venue
- Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-07-05
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1081-1087
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2100159406
- Cited by
- 1,031
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081
- The paper
- Mandelson, M. T. (2000). Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.