The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cellular Telephones and Cancer--a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of cellular telephones is increasing exponentially and has become part of everyday life. Concerns about possible carcinogenic effects of radiofrequency signals have been raised, although they are based on limited scientific evidence. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of cancer incidence was conducted in Denmark of all users of cellular telephones during the period from 1982 through 1995. Subscriber lists from the two Danish operating companies identified 420 095 cellular telephone users. Cancer incidence was determined by linkage with the Danish Cancer Registry. All statistical tests are two-sided. RESULTS: Overall, 3391 cancers were observed with 3825 expected, yielding a significantly decreased standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86 to 0.92). A substantial proportion of this decreased risk was attributed to deficits of lung cancer and other smoking-related cancers. No excesses were observed for cancers of the brain or nervous system (SIR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.12) or of the salivary gland (SIR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.29 to 1.49) or for leukemia (SIR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.78-1.21), cancers of a priori interest. Risk for these cancers also did not vary by duration of cellular telephone use, time since first subscription, age at first subscription, or type of cellular telephone (analogue or digital). Analysis of brain and nervous system tumors showed no statistically significant SIRs for any subtype or anatomic location. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation, the first nationwide cancer incidence study of cellular phone users, do not support the hypothesis of an association between use of these telephones and tumors of the brain or salivary gland, leukemia, or other cancers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 1998, Health Physics, 74, 494
- Van Leeuwen, 1999, Physics in medicine and biology, 44, 2367, 10.1088/0031-9155/44/10/301 · DOI
- Senior, 2000, Lancet, 355, 1793, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02273-X · DOI
- Lai, 1995, Bioelectromagnetics, 16, 207, 10.1002/bem.2250160309 · DOI · Paper page
- Lai, 1996, International journal of radiation biology, 69, 513, 10.1080/095530096145814 · DOI · Paper page
- Malyapa, 1997, Radiation research, 148, 608, 10.2307/3579737 · DOI
- Malyapa, 1997, Radiation research, 148, 618, 10.2307/3579738 · DOI
- Malyapa, 1998, Radiation research, 149, 637, 10.2307/3579911 · DOI
- Repacholi, 1997, Radiation research, 147, 631, 10.2307/3579630 · DOI · Paper page
- Repacholi, 1998, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 18, 161, 10.1088/0952-4746/18/3/002 · DOI
- Rothman, 1996, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 7, 303, 10.1097/00001648-199605000-00015 · DOI
- Hardell, 1999, International journal of oncology, 15, 113
- Temianka, 1999, JAMA, 282, 1814, 10.1001/jama.282.19.1814 · DOI
- Ahlbom, 1999, International journal of oncology, 15, 1045
- Morgan, 2000, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 11, 118, 10.1097/00001648-200003000-00007 · DOI
- COLEMAN, 1986, International Journal of Epidemiology, 15, 134, 10.1093/ije/15.1.134 · DOI
- Charlton, 2000, BMJ, 321, 1155, 10.1136/bmj.321.7269.1155 · DOI
- Davis, 1993, American journal of industrial medicine, 24, 231, 10.1002/ajim.4700240209 · DOI
- HAYES, 1990, International Journal of Epidemiology, 19, 825, 10.1093/ije/19.4.825 · DOI
- M ller, 1996, International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer, 66, 287, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960503)66:3<287::AID-IJC2>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
- Storm, 1997, Danish medical bulletin, 44, 535
- Funch, 1996, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 7, 299, 10.1097/00001648-199605000-00014 · DOI
- Balzano, 1999, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 83, 165, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032654 · DOI
- Rothman, 2000, Lancet, 356, 1837, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03244-X · DOI
- Muscat, 2000, JAMA, 284, 3001, 10.1001/jama.284.23.3001 · DOI · Paper page
- Inskip, 2001, New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 79, 10.1056/NEJM200101113440201 · DOI · Paper page
- Trichopoulos, 2001, New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 133, 10.1056/NEJM200101113440209 · DOI
Cited by
Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird
Engels, S., Schneider, N.-L., Lefeldt, N., Hein, C. M., Zapka, M., Michalik, A., Elbers, D., Kittel, A., Hore, P. J., & Mouritsen, H. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13290 · Cited by 403
Epidemiology of Health Effects of Radiofrequency Exposure
ICNIRP (International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) Standing Committee on Epidemiology:, Ahlbom, A., Green, A., Kheifets, L., Savitz, D., & Swerdlow, A. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7306 · Cited by 350
Little, M. P., Rajaraman, P., Curtis, R. E., Devesa, S. S., Inskip, P. D., Check, D. P., & Linet, M. S. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e1147 · Cited by 110
Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., & Mild, K. H. (2006) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2005.04.006 · Cited by 67
Kim, S., Han, D., Ryu, J., Kim, K., & Kim, Y. H. (2021) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111784 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Johansen, C., Boice, J. D., McLaughlin, J. K., & Olsen, J. H.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-02-07
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-207
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2106011526
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular Telephones and Cancer--a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/93.3.203
- The paper
- Johansen, C., Boice, J. D., McLaughlin, J. K., & Olsen, J. H. (2001). Cellular Telephones and Cancer--a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.3.203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.