Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cellular Telephones and Cancer--a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark

Johansen, C., Boice, J. D., McLaughlin, J. K., Olsen, J. H.·2001·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of cellular telephones is increasing exponentially and has become part of everyday life. Concerns about possible carcinogenic effects of radiofrequency signals have been raised, although they are based on limited scientific evidence. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of cancer incidence was conducted in Denmark of all users of cellular telephones during the period from 1982 through 1995. Subscriber lists from the two Danish operating companies identified 420 095 cellular telephone users. Cancer incidence was determined by linkage with the Danish Cancer Registry. All statistical tests are two-sided. RESULTS: Overall, 3391 cancers were observed with 3825 expected, yielding a significantly decreased standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86 to 0.92). A substantial proportion of this decreased risk was attributed to deficits of lung cancer and other smoking-related cancers. No excesses were observed for cancers of the brain or nervous system (SIR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.12) or of the salivary gland (SIR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.29 to 1.49) or for leukemia (SIR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.78-1.21), cancers of a priori interest. Risk for these cancers also did not vary by duration of cellular telephone use, time since first subscription, age at first subscription, or type of cellular telephone (analogue or digital). Analysis of brain and nervous system tumors showed no statistically significant SIRs for any subtype or anatomic location. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation, the first nationwide cancer incidence study of cellular phone users, do not support the hypothesis of an association between use of these telephones and tumors of the brain or salivary gland, leukemia, or other cancers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/93.3.203

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 1998, Health Physics, 74, 494
  2. Van Leeuwen, 1999, Physics in medicine and biology, 44, 2367, 10.1088/0031-9155/44/10/301 · DOI
  3. Senior, 2000, Lancet, 355, 1793, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02273-X · DOI
  4. Lai, 1995, Bioelectromagnetics, 16, 207, 10.1002/bem.2250160309 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lai, 1996, International journal of radiation biology, 69, 513, 10.1080/095530096145814 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Malyapa, 1997, Radiation research, 148, 608, 10.2307/3579737 · DOI
  7. Malyapa, 1997, Radiation research, 148, 618, 10.2307/3579738 · DOI
  8. Malyapa, 1998, Radiation research, 149, 637, 10.2307/3579911 · DOI
  9. Repacholi, 1997, Radiation research, 147, 631, 10.2307/3579630 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Repacholi, 1998, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 18, 161, 10.1088/0952-4746/18/3/002 · DOI
  11. Rothman, 1996, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 7, 303, 10.1097/00001648-199605000-00015 · DOI
  12. Hardell, 1999, International journal of oncology, 15, 113
  13. Temianka, 1999, JAMA, 282, 1814, 10.1001/jama.282.19.1814 · DOI
  14. Ahlbom, 1999, International journal of oncology, 15, 1045
  15. Morgan, 2000, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 11, 118, 10.1097/00001648-200003000-00007 · DOI
  16. COLEMAN, 1986, International Journal of Epidemiology, 15, 134, 10.1093/ije/15.1.134 · DOI
  17. Charlton, 2000, BMJ, 321, 1155, 10.1136/bmj.321.7269.1155 · DOI
  18. Davis, 1993, American journal of industrial medicine, 24, 231, 10.1002/ajim.4700240209 · DOI
  19. HAYES, 1990, International Journal of Epidemiology, 19, 825, 10.1093/ije/19.4.825 · DOI
  20. M ller, 1996, International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer, 66, 287, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960503)66:3<287::AID-IJC2>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
  21. Storm, 1997, Danish medical bulletin, 44, 535
  22. Funch, 1996, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 7, 299, 10.1097/00001648-199605000-00014 · DOI
  23. Balzano, 1999, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 83, 165, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032654 · DOI
  24. Rothman, 2000, Lancet, 356, 1837, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03244-X · DOI
  25. Muscat, 2000, JAMA, 284, 3001, 10.1001/jama.284.23.3001 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Inskip, 2001, New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 79, 10.1056/NEJM200101113440201 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Trichopoulos, 2001, New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 133, 10.1056/NEJM200101113440209 · DOI

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Johansen, C., Boice, J. D., McLaughlin, J. K., & Olsen, J. H.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2001-02-07
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
203-207
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2106011526
Cited by
325
References
0
FWCI
21.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular Telephones and Cancer--a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/93.3.203
The paper
Johansen, C., Boice, J. D., McLaughlin, J. K., & Olsen, J. H. (2001). Cellular Telephones and Cancer--a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.3.203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.