Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 477

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial of Darbepoetin Alfa in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

Vansteenkiste, J.·2002·CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment

Abstract

Background: Patients receiving chemotherapy often develop anemia. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp™) is an erythropoiesis-stimulating glycoprotein that has been shown, in dose-finding studies, to be safe and clinically active when administered to patients with cancer every 1, 2, or 3 weeks. This phase III study compared the safety and efficacy of darbepoetin alfa with placebo in patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy. Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 320 anemic patients (hemoglobin ≤11.0 g/dL) were randomly assigned to receive darbepoetin alfa or placebo injections weekly for 12 weeks. The 297 patients who completed at least the first 28 days of study were assessed for red blood cell transfusions, the primary endpoint. Patients were also assessed for hemoglobin concentration (i.e., hematopoietic response), adverse events, antibody formation to darbepoetin alfa, hospitalizations, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)–Fatigue score, and disease outcome. Efficacy endpoints were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analyses, Cox proportional hazards analyses, and chi-square tests where appropriate. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Patients receiving darbepoetin alfa required fewer transfusions (27% versus 52%; mean difference = 25%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14% to 36%; P<.001), required fewer units of blood (0.67 versus 1.92; mean difference = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.84; P<.001), had more hematopoietic responses (66% versus 24%; mean difference = 42%; 95% CI = 31% to 53%; P<.001), and had better improvement in FACT–Fatigue scores (56% versus 44% overall improvement; 32% versus 19% with ≥25% improvement; mean difference = 13%; 95% CI = 2% to 23%, P = .019) than patients receiving placebo. Patients receiving darbepoetin alfa did not appear to have any untoward effect in disease outcome and did not develop antibodies to the drug. Adverse events were similar between the groups. Conclusions: Patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia can safely and effectively be treated with weekly darbepoetin alfa therapy. Darbepoetin alfa decreased blood transfusion requirements, increased hemoglobin concentration, and decreased fatigue. Although no conclusions can be drawn about survival from this study, the potential salutary effect on disease outcome warrants further investigation in a prospectively designed study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/94.16.1211

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 477

Metadata

Authors
Vansteenkiste, J.
Venue
CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment
Published
2002-08-21
Volume
94
Issue
16
Pages
1211-1220
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2146353390
Cited by
477
References
25
FWCI
18.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial of Darbepoetin Alfa in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/94.16.1211
The paper
Vansteenkiste, J. (2002). Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial of Darbepoetin Alfa in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy. CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.16.1211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.