Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Serum Sex Steroids in Premenopausal Women and Breast Cancer Risk Within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)

Kaaks, Rudolf, Berrino, Franco, Key, Timothy, Rinaldi, Sabina, Dossus, Laure, Biessy, Carine, Secreto, Giorgio, Amiano, Pilar, Bingham, Sheila, Boeing, Heiner, de Mesquita, H. Bas Bueno, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise, Fournier, Agnès, van Gils, Carla H., Gonzalez, Carlos A., Gurrea, Aurelio Barricarte, Critselis, Elena, Khaw, Kay Tee, Krogh, Vittorio, Lahmann, Petra H., Nagel, Gabriele, Olsen, Anja, Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte, Overvad, Kim, Palli, Domenico, Panico, Salvatore, Peeters, Petra, Quirós, J. Ramón, Roddam, Andrew, Thiebaut, Anne, Tjønneland, Anne, Chirlaque, Ma Dolores, Trichopoulou, Antonia, Trichopoulos, Dimitrios, Tumino, Rosario, Vineis, Paolo, Norat, Teresa, Ferrari, Pietro, Slimani, Nadia, Riboli, Elio·2005·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrasting etiologic hypotheses about the role of endogenous sex steroids in breast cancer development among premenopausal women implicate ovarian androgen excess and progesterone deficiency, estrogen excess, estrogen and progesterone excess, and both an excess or lack of adrenal androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA] or its sulfate [DHEAS]) as risk factors. We conducted a case-control study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort to examine associations among premenopausal serum concentrations of sex steroids and subsequent breast cancer risk. METHODS: Levels of DHEAS, (Delta4-)androstenedione, testosterone, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) were measured in single prediagnostic serum samples from 370 premenopausal women who subsequently developed breast cancer (case patients) and from 726 matched cancer-free control subjects. Levels of progesterone, estrone, and estradiol were also measured for the 285 case patients and 555 matched control subjects who had provided information about the day of menstrual cycle at blood donation. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate relative risks of breast cancer by quartiles of hormone concentrations. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Increased risks of breast cancer were associated with elevated serum concentrations of testosterone (odds ratio [OR] for highest versus lowest quartile = 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16 to 2.57; P(trend) = .01), androstenedione (OR for highest versus lowest quartile = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.32; P(trend) = .01), and DHEAS (OR for highest versus lowest quartile = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.02 to 2.14; P(trend) = .10) but not SHBG. Elevated serum progesterone concentrations were associated with a statistically significant reduction in breast cancer risk (OR for highest versus lowest quartile = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.98; P(trend) = .06). The absolute risk of breast cancer for women younger than 40 followed up for 10 years was estimated at 2.6% for those in the highest quartile of serum testosterone versus 1.5% for those in the lowest quartile; for the highest and lowest quartiles of progesterone, these estimates were 1.7% and 2.6%, respectively. Breast cancer risk was not statistically significantly associated with serum levels of the other hormones. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that elevated blood concentrations of androgens are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/dji132

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Kaaks, R., Berrino, F., Key, T., Rinaldi, S., Dossus, L., Biessy, C., Secreto, G., Amiano, P., Bingham, S., Boeing, H., de Mesquita, H. B. B., Chang-Claude, J., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Fournier, A., van Gils, C. H., Gonzalez, C. A., Gurrea, A. B., Critselis, E., Khaw, K. T., Krogh, V., Lahmann, P. H., Nagel, G., Olsen, A., Onland-Moret, N. C., Overvad, K., Palli, D., Panico, S., Peeters, P., Quirós, J. R., Roddam, A., Thiebaut, A., Tjønneland, A., Chirlaque, M. D., Trichopoulou, A., Trichopoulos, D., Tumino, R., Vineis, P., Norat, T., Ferrari, P., Slimani, N., & Riboli, E.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2005-05-18
Volume
97
Issue
10
Pages
755-765
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2115379774
Cited by
420
References
50
FWCI
16.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serum Sex Steroids in Premenopausal Women and Breast Cancer Risk Within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/dji132
The paper
Kaaks, R., Berrino, F., Key, T., Rinaldi, S., Dossus, L., Biessy, C., Secreto, G., Amiano, P., Bingham, S., Boeing, H., de Mesquita, H. B. B., Chang-Claude, J., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Fournier, A., van Gils, C. H., Gonzalez, C. A., Gurrea, A. B., Critselis, E., Khaw, K. T., . . . Riboli, E. (2005). Serum Sex Steroids in Premenopausal Women and Breast Cancer Risk Within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji132

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.