Cited by 166Phytoestrogen effects and researchPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesEstrogen and related hormone effects

Plasma phytoestrogens and subsequent breast cancer risk

Open access
Verheus, Martijn, van Gils, Carla H., Keinan-Boker, Lital, Grace, Philip B., Bingham, Sheila A., Peeters, Petra H.M.·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Phytoestrogens are plant compounds that are structurally and functionally similar to mammalian estrogens. By competing for estrogen receptors, phytoestrogens possibly inhibit binding of the more potent endogenous estrogens and decrease their potential effects on breast cancer risk. We investigated the association between plasma phytoestrogen levels and breast cancer risk in a prospective manner. Patients and Methods: We performed a nested case-control study within the Prospect cohort, one of the two Dutch cohorts participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. A total of 383 women (87 pre- or perimenopausal women [mean age, 52 years] and 296 postmenopausal women [mean age, 59 years]) who developed breast cancer were selected as case subjects and were matched to 383 controls, on date of blood sampling. Plasma levels of isoflavones (daidzein, genistein, glycitein, O-desmethylangolensin, and equol) and lignans (enterodiol and enterolactone) were measured. The isotope dilution liquid chromatography/tandem mass-spectrometry method incorporating triply 13 C-labeled standards was used for all analyses. Breast cancer odds ratios were calculated for tertiles of phytoestrogen plasma levels using conditional logistic regression analysis. Results: For genistein, the risk estimate for the highest versus the lowest tertile was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.98). Similar protective effects, although not statistically significant, were seen for the other isoflavones. Lignan levels did not appear to be related to breast cancer risk. Results were the same in pre- or perimenopausal women, and in postmenopausal women. Conclusion: High genistein circulation levels are associated with reduced breast cancer risk in the Dutch population. No effects of lignans on breast cancer risk were observed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.06.0244

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of eight nested case-control studies assessing risk of breast cancer, one showed significantly reduced risk associated with higher plasma genistein.

    “Of eight studies assessing risk of breast cancer, one showed significantly reduced risk associated with higher plasma genistein [90].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ososki AL, Kennelly EJ: Phytoestrogens: A review of the present state of research. Phytother Res 17:845-869, 2003
  2. Adlercreutz CH, Goldin BR, Gorbach SL, et al: Soybean phytoestrogen intake and cancer risk. J Nutr 125:757S-770S, 1995 18. Glazier MG, Bowman MA: A review of the evidence for the use of phytoestrogens as a replace- ment for traditional estrogen replacement therapy. Arch Intern Med 161:1161-1172, 2001
  3. Peeters PH, Keinan-Boker L, van der Schouw YT, et al: Phytoestrogens and breast cancer risk: Review of the epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 77:171-183, 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verheus, M., van Gils, C. H., Keinan-Boker, L., Grace, P. B., Bingham, S. A., & Peeters, P. H. M.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands; Israel Center for Disease Control, Ministry of Health, and School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel; Horseracing Forensic Laboratory Ltd, Fordham; and the Medical Research Council Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2007-02-09
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
648-655
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2117120389
Cited by
166
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Cancer Research Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
phytoestrogens, breast cancer risk, genistein, isoflavones, lignans, daidzein, glycitein, equol, O-desmethylangolensin, enterolactone, enterodiol, plasma biomarkers, menopausal status
MeSH terms
Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Tumor, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Age Distribution, Premenopause, Postmenopause, Risk Assessment, Genistein, Phytoestrogens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review