The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Multicenter Trial of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Standard Axillary Treatment in Operable Breast Cancer: The ALMANAC Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with operable breast cancer is routinely used in some countries for staging the axilla despite limited data from randomized trials on morbidity and mortality outcomes. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to compare quality-of-life outcomes between patients with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer who received sentinel lymph node biopsy and patients who received standard axillary treatment. METHODS: The primary outcome measures were arm and shoulder morbidity and quality of life. From November 1999 to October 2003, 1031 patients were randomly assigned to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (n = 515) or standard axillary surgery (n = 516). Patients with sentinel lymph node metastases proceeded to delayed axillary clearance or received axillary radiotherapy (depending on the protocol at the treating institution). Intention-to-treat analyses of data at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery are presented. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The relative risks of any lymphedema and sensory loss for the sentinel lymph node biopsy group compared with the standard axillary treatment group at 12 months were 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.60; absolute rates: 5% versus 13%) and 0.37 (95% CI = 0.27 to 0.50; absolute rates: 11% versus 31%), respectively. Drain usage, length of hospital stay, and time to resumption of normal day-to-day activities after surgery were statistically significantly lower in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (all P < .001), and axillary operative time was reduced (P = .055). Overall patient-recorded quality of life and arm functioning scores were statistically significantly better in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group throughout (all P < or = .003). These benefits were seen with no increase in anxiety levels in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with reduced arm morbidity and better quality of life than standard axillary treatment and should be the treatment of choice for patients who have early-stage breast cancer with clinically negative nodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., Bonomi, A. E., Tulsky, D. S., Lloyd, S. R., Deasy, S., Cobleigh, M., & Shiomoto, G. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.974 · Cited by 1,752
Arm edema in breast cancer patients
Erickson, V. S., Pearson, M. L., Ganz, P. A., Adams, J., & Kahn, K. L. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.2.96 · Cited by 560
Eton, D. T., Cella, D., Yost, K. J., Yount, S. E., Peterman, A. H., Neuberg, D. S., Sledge, G. W., & Wood, W. C. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.01.012 · Cited by 390
Cited by
Krag, D. N., Anderson, S. J., Julian, T. B., Brown, A. M., Harlow, S. P., Costantino, J. P., Ashikaga, T., Weaver, D. L., Mamounas, E. P., Jalovec, L. M., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70207-2 · Cited by 1,920
Wilke, L. G., McCall, L. M., Posther, K. E., Whitworth, P. W., Reintgen, D. S., Leitch, A. M., Gabram, S. G. A., Lucci, A., Cox, C. E., Hunt, K. K., et al. (2006) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/aso.2006.05.013 · Cited by 580
Breast cancer-related lymphedema: risk factors, precautionary measures, and treatments
Gillespie, T. C., Sayegh, H. E., Brunelle, C. L., Daniell, K. M., & Taghian, A. G. (2018) · Gland Surgery · doi:10.21037/gs.2017.11.04 · Cited by 361
Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: A review
Taghian, N. R., Miller, C. L., Jammallo, L. S., O’Toole, J., & Skolny, M. N. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.06.004 · Cited by 333
Wang, L., Guyatt, G. H., Kennedy, S. A., Romerosa, B., Kwon, H. Y., Kaushal, A., Chang, Y., Craigie, S., de Almeida, C. P. B., Couban, R. J., et al. (2016) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.151276 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Mansel, R. E., Fallowfield, L., Kissin, M., Goyal, A., Newcombe, R. G., Dixon, J. M., Yiangou, C., Horgan, K., Bundred, N., Monypenny, I., England, D., Sibbering, M., Abdullah, T. I., Barr, L., Chetty, U., Sinnett, D. H., Fleissig, A., Clarke, D., & Ell, P. J.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05-03
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 599-609
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2161911084
- Cited by
- 1,679
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Multicenter Trial of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Standard Axillary Treatment in Operable Breast Cancer: The ALMANAC Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djj158
- The paper
- Mansel, R. E., Fallowfield, L., Kissin, M., Goyal, A., Newcombe, R. G., Dixon, J. M., Yiangou, C., Horgan, K., Bundred, N., Monypenny, I., England, D., Sibbering, M., Abdullah, T. I., Barr, L., Chetty, U., Sinnett, D. H., Fleissig, A., Clarke, D., & Ell, P. J. (2006). Randomized Multicenter Trial of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Standard Axillary Treatment in Operable Breast Cancer: The ALMANAC Trial. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.