Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation and Clinical Utility of a 70-Gene Prognostic Signature for Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Open access
Buyse, Marc, Loi, Sherene, van't Veer, Laura, Viale, Giuseppe, Delorenzi, Mauro, Glas, Annuska M., Saghatchian d'Assignies, Mahasti, Bergh, Jonas, Lidereau, Rosette, Ellis, Paul, Harris, Adrian, Bogaerts, Jan, Therasse, Patrick, Floore, Arno, Amakrane, Mohamed, Piette, Fanny, Rutgers, Emiel, Sotiriou, Christos, Cardoso, Fatima, Piccart, Martine J.·2006·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A 70-gene signature was previously shown to have prognostic value in patients with node-negative breast cancer. Our goal was to validate the signature in an independent group of patients. METHODS: Patients (n = 307, with 137 events after a median follow-up of 13.6 years) from five European centers were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the gene signature classification and on clinical risk classifications. Patients were assigned to the gene signature low-risk group if their 5-year distant metastasis-free survival probability as estimated by the gene signature was greater than 90%. Patients were assigned to the clinicopathologic low-risk group if their 10-year survival probability, as estimated by Adjuvant! software, was greater than 88% (for estrogen receptor [ER]-positive patients) or 92% (for ER-negative patients). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated to compare time to distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival in high- versus low-risk groups. RESULTS: The 70-gene signature outperformed the clinicopathologic risk assessment in predicting all endpoints. For time to distant metastases, the gene signature yielded HR = 2.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35 to 4.00) without adjustment for clinical risk and hazard ratios ranging from 2.13 to 2.15 after adjustment for various estimates of clinical risk; clinicopathologic risk using Adjuvant! software yielded an unadjusted HR = 1.68 (95% CI = 0.92 to 3.07). For overall survival, the gene signature yielded an unadjusted HR = 2.79 (95% CI = 1.60 to 4.87) and adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 2.63 to 2.89; clinicopathologic risk yielded an unadjusted HR = 1.67 (95% CI = 0.93 to 2.98). For patients in the gene signature high-risk group, 10-year overall survival was 0.69 for patients in both the low- and high-clinical risk groups; for patients in the gene signature low-risk group, the 10-year survival rates were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 70-gene signature adds independent prognostic information to clinicopathologic risk assessment for patients with early breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djj329

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,238

Metadata

Authors
Buyse, M., Loi, S., van't Veer, L., Viale, G., Delorenzi, M., Glas, A. M., Saghatchian d'Assignies, M., Bergh, J., Lidereau, R., Ellis, P., Harris, A., Bogaerts, J., Therasse, P., Floore, A., Amakrane, M., Piette, F., Rutgers, E., Sotiriou, C., Cardoso, F., & Piccart, M. J.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2006-09-06
Volume
98
Issue
17
Pages
1183-1192
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2156273110
Cited by
1,238
References
1
FWCI
35.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation and Clinical Utility of a 70-Gene Prognostic Signature for Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djj329
The paper
Buyse, M., Loi, S., van't Veer, L., Viale, G., Delorenzi, M., Glas, A. M., Saghatchian d'Assignies, M., Bergh, J., Lidereau, R., Ellis, P., Harris, A., Bogaerts, J., Therasse, P., Floore, A., Amakrane, M., Piette, F., Rutgers, E., Sotiriou, C., Cardoso, F., & Piccart, M. J. (2006). Validation and Clinical Utility of a 70-Gene Prognostic Signature for Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj329

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.