Cited by 248Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchHematological disorders and diagnosticsHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Characteristics of US Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results of Six Cross-sectional Physician Surveys

Open access
Sekeres, Mikkael A., Schoonen, W. Marieke, Kantarjian, Hagop, List, Alan, Fryzek, Jon, Paquette, Ronald, Maciejewski, Jaroslaw P.·2008·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a group of pathologically and cytogenetically distinct bone marrow disorders. Little is known about the characteristics of MDS patients, including their pathological and prognostic classifications, cytopenias, transfusion and supportive care needs, and treatment regimens. We describe these characteristics in a large group of recently diagnosed and existing (ie, established) MDS patients. METHODS: We conducted six consecutive cross-sectional surveys among US hematology and medical oncology specialists (identified from an American Medical Association [AMA] database of physicians who administer chemotherapy) between June 2005 and January 2007. A questionnaire collected data on the characteristics and treatment patterns of the 4-10 most recently seen MDS patients for each physician, including demographic data, transfusion needs, treatment approaches, and consideration for clinical trials or bone marrow transplantation. RESULTS: A panel of 101 physicians who were geographically representative of physicians registered with the AMA characterized 614-827 patients per survey, for a total of 4514 responses. Among recently diagnosed patients, 55% were male (95% confidence interval [CI] = 52% to 59%), the median age at diagnosis was 71 years (range = 65-80 years), and 10% (95% CI = 8% to 12%) had MDS secondary to chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or environmental exposure. The median duration of MDS in established patients ranged from 13 to 16 months over the six surveys. Among recently diagnosed MDS patients, fewer patients with lower-risk disease than with higher-risk disease were dependent on either red blood cell transfusions (22% vs 68%) or platelet transfusions (6% vs 33%). More than 50% of all newly diagnosed and established patients used erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. A small percentage of all patients either had had or were being considered for bone marrow transplantation (recently diagnosed: 4%; established: 4% or less) or were being treated on clinical trials (recently diagnosed: 1%; established: 4% or less). CONCLUSIONS: MDS patients in the United States have substantial transfusion needs, and use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and are seldom considered for bone marrow transplantation or clinical trials. These data may be useful in characterizing the health care resource use and pharmacoeconomic impact of MDS in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djn349

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Saarni MI , Linman JW . Preleukemia. The hematologic syndrome preced- ing acute leukemia . Am J Med . 1973 ; 55 ( 1 ): 38 -48 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sekeres, M. A., Schoonen, W. M., Kantarjian, H., List, A., Fryzek, J., Paquette, R., & Maciejewski, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2008-11-05
Volume
100
Issue
21
Pages
1542-1551
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2099071696
Cited by
248
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Research Resources (U54 RR19397-03, U54RR019397)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hematological disorders and diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
myelodysplastic syndrome, patient characteristics, transfusion requirements, red blood cell transfusion, platelet transfusion, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, bone marrow transplantation, clinical trial participation, risk classification, supportive care needs, treatment patterns, health care utilization, pharmacoeconomics, United States patients, cytopenia
MeSH terms
Darbepoetin alfa, Adult, Aged, Blood Transfusion, Cross-Sectional Studies, Erythropoietin, Female, Health Resources, Hematinics, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Physicians, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, United States, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Economics, Pharmaceutical, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review