The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling of breast cancer has identified two biologically distinct estrogen receptor (ER)-positive subtypes of breast cancer: luminal A and luminal B. Luminal B tumors have higher proliferation and poorer prognosis than luminal A tumors. In this study, we developed a clinically practical immunohistochemistry assay to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors and investigated its ability to separate tumors according to breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival. METHODS: Tumors from a cohort of 357 patients with invasive breast carcinomas were subtyped by gene expression profile. Hormone receptor status, HER2 status, and the Ki67 index (percentage of Ki67-positive cancer nuclei) were determined immunohistochemically. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the Ki67 cut point to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors. The prognostic value of the immunohistochemical assignment for breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival was investigated with an independent tissue microarray series of 4046 breast cancers by use of Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Gene expression profiling classified 101 (28%) of the 357 tumors as luminal A and 69 (19%) as luminal B. The best Ki67 index cut point to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors was 13.25%. In an independent cohort of 4046 patients with breast cancer, 2847 had hormone receptor-positive tumors. When HER2 immunohistochemistry and the Ki67 index were used to subtype these 2847 tumors, we classified 1530 (59%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 57% to 61%) as luminal A, 846 (33%, 95% CI = 31% to 34%) as luminal B, and 222 (9%, 95% CI = 7% to 10%) as luminal-HER2 positive. Luminal B and luminal-HER2-positive breast cancers were statistically significantly associated with poor breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival in all adjuvant systemic treatment categories. Of particular relevance are women who received tamoxifen as their sole adjuvant systemic therapy, among whom the 10-year breast cancer-specific survival was 79% (95% CI = 76% to 83%) for luminal A, 64% (95% CI = 59% to 70%) for luminal B, and 57% (95% CI = 47% to 69%) for luminal-HER2 subtypes. CONCLUSION: Expression of ER, progesterone receptor, and HER2 proteins and the Ki67 index appear to distinguish luminal A from luminal B breast cancer subtypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slamon, D. J., Leyland-Jones, B., Shak, S., Fuchs, H., Paton, V., Bajamonde, A., Fleming, T., Eiermann, W., Wolter, J., Pegram, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200103153441101 · Cited by 11,500
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885 · cited 3×
“41 (30-57) 47 (40-55) 64 (59-69) 81 (77-85)”
Cited by
Metastatic Behavior of Breast Cancer Subtypes
Kennecke, H., Yerushalmi, R., Woods, R., Cheang, M. C. U., Voduc, D., Speers, C. H., Nielsen, T. O., & Gelmon, K. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.9820 · Cited by 2,262
Self-citationKi67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential
Yerushalmi, R., Woods, R., Ravdin, P. M., Hayes, M. M., & Gelmon, K. A. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70262-1 · Cited by 1,207
Molecular biology in breast cancer: Intrinsic subtypes and signaling pathways
Eroles, P., Bosch, A., Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, J., & Lluch, A. (2012) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.11.005 · Cited by 624
Prat, A., Cheang, M. C. U., Martín, M., Parker, J. S., Carrasco, E., Caballero, R., Tyldesley, S., Gelmon, K., Bernard, P. S., Nielsen, T. O., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.43.4134 · Cited by 587
Self-citationClassification and prognosis of invasive breast cancer: from morphology to molecular taxonomy
Schnitt, S. J. (2010) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2010.33 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheang, M. C. U., Chia, S. K., Voduc, D., Gao, D., Leung, S., Snider, J., Watson, M., Davies, S., Bernard, P. S., Parker, J. S., Perou, C. M., Ellis, M. J., & Nielsen, T. O.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-05-20
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 736-750
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2127057139
- Cited by
- 2,249
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djp082
- The paper
- Cheang, M. C. U., Chia, S. K., Voduc, D., Gao, D., Leung, S., Snider, J., Watson, M., Davies, S., Bernard, P. S., Parker, J. S., Perou, C. M., Ellis, M. J., & Nielsen, T. O. (2009). Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.