Cited by 211Cancer survivorship and careEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerFrailty in Older Adults

Impact of Cancer on Health-Related Quality of Life of Older Americans

Open access
Reeve, B. B., Potosky, A. L., Smith, A. W., Han, P. K., Hays, R. D., Davis, W. W., Arora, N. K., Haffer, S. C. +1 more·2009·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of cancer on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is poorly understood because of the lack of baseline HRQOL status before cancer diagnosis. To our knowledge, this is the first population-based study to quantify the nature and extent of HRQOL changes from before to after cancer diagnosis for nine types of cancer patients and to compare their health with individuals without cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry data were linked with the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) data; data were collected from Medicare beneficiaries who were aged 65 years and older from 1998 through 2003. Cancer patients (n = 1432; with prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, bladder, endometrial, or kidney cancers; melanoma; or non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]) were selected whose first cancer diagnosis occurred between their baseline and follow-up MHOS assessments. Control subjects without cancer (n = 7160) were matched to cancer patients by use of propensity scores that were estimated from demographics and comorbid medical conditions. Analysis of covariance models were used to estimate changes in HRQOL as assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 survey (mean score = 50, SD = 10). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Patients with all cancer types (except melanoma and endometrial cancer) reported statistically significant declines in physical health (mean scores: prostate cancer = -3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.5 to -4.2; breast cancer = -3.5, 95% CI = -2.5 to -4.5; bladder cancer = -4.3, 95% CI = -2.5 to -6.1; colorectal cancer = -4.4, 95% CI = -3.3 to -5.5; kidney cancer = -5.7, 95% CI = -3.2 to -8.2; NHL = -6.7, 95% CI = -4.4 to -9.1; and lung cancer = -7.5, 95% CI = -5.9 to -9.2) compared with the control subjects (mean score = -1.8, 95% CI = -1.6 to -2.0) (all P < .05). However, only lung (mean score = -5.4, 95% CI = -3.5 to -7.2), colorectal (mean score = -3.5, 95% CI = -2.2 to -4.7), and prostate (mean score = -2.8, 95% CI = -1.8 to -3.7) cancer patients showed statistically significant decreases in mental health relative to the mean change of the control subjects (mean score = -1.2, 95% CI = -0.9 to -1.4) (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: These findings provide validation of the specific deleterious effects of cancer on HRQOL and an evidence base for future research and clinical interventions aimed at understanding and remediating these effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djp123

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epidemiological studies find that survivors of almost all types of cancer have significantly poorer mental health and health-related QOL than nonsurvivors.

    “Epidemiological studies find that survivors of almost all types of cancer have significantly poorer mental health46 and health-related QOL47 than nonsurvivors.”

    From Individualized, Single Session Yoga Therapy to Reduce Physical and Emotional Symptoms in Hospitalized Hematological Cancer Patients. (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Results report significantly greater declines in physical health for seven of nine cancer types among older patients, supporting the health-related quality-of-life portion of the claim. But the comparison was with matched people without cancer, not “nonsurvivors,” and the study does not establish this finding for cancer survivors generally. The mental-health portion carries a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [13]Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al., editors. 2007. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2004, National Cancer Institute, based on November 2006 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER Web site. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/. Accessed August 28, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. [14]McCall N, Bonito A, Trofimovich L. Estimation and analysis of non-response bias in Medicare surveys. Final report prepared by RTI International for the National Committee for Quality Assurance and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services under contract #500-00-0055. http://www.hosonline.org/surveys/hos/download/Non-Response%20Bias%20Report_8-11-04.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. [22]Bergstralh E, Kosanke J GMATCH SAS Macro. Mayo Clinic. http://mayoresearch.mayo.edu/mayo/research/biostat/sasmacros.cfm. Accessed August 28, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. [31]American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2008. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  5. [32]Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Prevalence database: US Estimated Complete Prevalence Counts on 1/1/2004. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program, Statistical Research and Applications Branch, released April 2007, based on SEER data submission. www.seer.cancer.gov. Accessed August 28, 2008. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reeve, B. B., Potosky, A. L., Smith, A. W., Han, P. K., Hays, R. D., Davis, W. W., Arora, N. K., Haffer, S. C., & Clauser, S. B.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2009-06-09
Volume
101
Issue
12
Pages
860-868
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2124540500
Cited by
211
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
health-related quality of life, cancer, older adults, physical function, cancer survivors, lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, kidney cancer, bladder cancer, melanoma, endometrial cancer, physical health decline, Medicare beneficiaries, SF-36, Medicare Health Outcomes Survey, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Female, Medicare, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Medical Record Linkage, Mental Health, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, United States, Comorbidity, Case-Control Studies, Cost of Illness, SEER Program, Benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review