The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Decision Support Framework for Genomically Informed Investigational Cancer Therapy
Open accessAbstract
Rapidly improving understanding of molecular oncology, emerging novel therapeutics, and increasingly available and affordable next-generation sequencing have created an opportunity for delivering genomically informed personalized cancer therapy. However, to implement genomically informed therapy requires that a clinician interpret the patient's molecular profile, including molecular characterization of the tumor and the patient's germline DNA. In this Commentary, we review existing data and tools for precision oncology and present a framework for reviewing the available biomedical literature on therapeutic implications of genomic alterations. Genomic alterations, including mutations, insertions/deletions, fusions, and copy number changes, need to be curated in terms of the likelihood that they alter the function of a "cancer gene" at the level of a specific variant in order to discriminate so-called "drivers" from "passengers." Alterations that are targetable either directly or indirectly with approved or investigational therapies are potentially "actionable." At this time, evidence linking predictive biomarkers to therapies is strong for only a few genomic markers in the context of specific cancer types. For these genomic alterations in other diseases and for other genomic alterations, the clinical data are either absent or insufficient to support routine clinical implementation of biomarker-based therapy. However, there is great interest in optimally matching patients to early-phase clinical trials. Thus, we need accessible, comprehensive, and frequently updated knowledge bases that describe genomic changes and their clinical implications, as well as continued education of clinicians and patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.
Adzhubei, I. A., Schmidt, S., Peshkin, L., Ramensky, V. E., Gerasimova, A., Bork, P., Kondrashov, A. S., & Sunyaev, S. R. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · Cited by 13,194
The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity
Barretina, J., Caponigro, G., Stransky, N., Venkatesan, K., Margolin, A. A., Kim, S., Wilson, C. J., Lehár, J., Kryukov, G. V., Sonkin, D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11003 · Cited by 7,950
Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing
Gerlinger, M., Rowan, A. J., Horswell, S., Larkin, J., Endesfelder, D., Gronroos, E., Martinez, P., Matthews, N., Stewart, A., Tarpey, P., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1113205 · Cited by 7,774
Kumar, P., Henikoff, S., & Ng, P. C. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.86 · Cited by 6,521
Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells
Garnett, M. J., Edelman, E. J., Heidorn, S. J., Greenman, C. D., Dastur, A., Lau, K. W., Greninger, P., Thompson, I. R., Luo, X., Soares, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11005 · Cited by 2,456
Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer
Misale, S., Yaeger, R., Hobor, S., Scala, E., Janakiraman, M., Liska, D., Valtorta, E., Schiavo, R., Buscarino, M., Siravegna, G., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11156 · Cited by 1,889
Bean, J., Brennan, C., Shih, J.-Y., Riely, G., Viale, A., Wang, L., Chitale, D., Motoi, N., Szoke, J., Broderick, S., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710370104 · Cited by 1,598
Cancer stem cells: an old idea–a paradigm shift
Wicha, M. S., Liu, S., & Dontu, G. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3153 · Cited by 1,378
Montagut, C., Dalmases, A., Bellosillo, B., Crespo, M., Pairet, S., Iglesias, M., Salido, M., Gallen, M., Marsters, S., Tsai, S. P., et al. (2012) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2609 · Cited by 513
Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies
Haibe-Kains, B., El-Hachem, N., Birkbak, N. J., Jin, A. C., Beck, A. H., Aerts, H. J. W. L., & Quackenbush, J. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12831 · Cited by 499
Cited by
Functional precision cancer medicine—moving beyond pure genomics
Letai, A. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4389 · Cited by 366
Chae, Y. K., Pan, A. P., Davis, A. A., Patel, S. P., Carneiro, B. A., Kurzrock, R., & Giles, F. J. (2017) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0597 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Meric-Bernstam, F., Johnson, A., Holla, V., Bailey, A. M., Brusco, L., Chen, K., Routbort, M., Patel, K. P., Zeng, J., Kopetz, S., Davies, M. A., Piha-Paul, S. A., Hong, D. S., Eterovic, A. K., Tsimberidou, A. M., Broaddus, R., Bernstam, E. V., Shaw, K. R., Mendelsohn, J., & Mills, G. B.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-04-11
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2026455681
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Decision Support Framework for Genomically Informed Investigational Cancer Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djv098
- The paper
- Meric-Bernstam, F., Johnson, A., Holla, V., Bailey, A. M., Brusco, L., Chen, K., Routbort, M., Patel, K. P., Zeng, J., Kopetz, S., Davies, M. A., Piha-Paul, S. A., Hong, D. S., Eterovic, A. K., Tsimberidou, A. M., Broaddus, R., Bernstam, E. V., Shaw, K. R., Mendelsohn, J., & Mills, G. B. (2015). A Decision Support Framework for Genomically Informed Investigational Cancer Therapy. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
