Cited by 158Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesBreast Lesions and CarcinomasCancer Cells and Metastasis

Impact of Epithelial–Stromal Interactions on Peritumoral Fibroblasts in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

Open access
Strell, Carina, Paulsson, Janna, Jin, Shao-Bo, Tobin, Nicholas P, Mezheyeuski, Artur, Roswall, Pernilla, Mutgan, Ceren, Mitsios, Nicholas +12 more·2019·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Background: A better definition of biomarkers and biological processes related to local recurrence and disease progression is highly warranted for ductal breast carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Stromal–epithelial interactions are likely of major importance for the biological, clinical, and pathological distinctions between high- and low-risk DCIS cases. Methods: Stromal platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) was immunohistochemically assessed in two DCIS patient cohorts (n = 458 and n = 80). Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the hazard ratios of recurrence. The molecular mechanisms regulating stromal PDGFR expression were investigated in experimental in vitro co-culture systems of DCIS cells and fibroblasts and analyzed using immunoblot and quantitative real-time PCR. Knock-out of JAG1 in DCIS cells and NOTCH2 in fibroblasts was obtained through CRISPR/Cas9. Experimental data were validated by mammary fat pad injection of DCIS and DCIS-JAG1 knock-out cells (10 mice per group). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: PDGFRα(low)/PDGFRβ(high) fibroblasts were associated with increased risk for recurrence in DCIS (univariate hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02 to 2.46; P = .04 Wald test; multivariable hazard ratio = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.07 to 2.97; P = .03). Tissue culture and mouse model studies indicated that this fibroblast phenotype is induced by DCIS cells in a cell contact-dependent manner. Epithelial Jagged1 and fibroblast Notch2 were identified through loss-of-function studies as key juxtacrine signaling components driving the formation of the poor prognosis-associated fibroblast phenotype. Conclusions: A PDGFRα(low)/PDGFRβ(high) fibroblast subset was identified as a marker for high-risk DCIS. The Jagged-1/Notch2/PDGFR stroma–epithelial pathway was described as a novel signaling mechanism regulating this poor prognosis-associated fibroblast subset. In general terms, the study highlights epithelial–stromal crosstalk in DCIS and contributes to ongoing efforts to define clinically relevant fibroblast subsets and their etiology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djy234

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contact between cancer cells and fibroblasts can promote the CAF phenotype in breast cancer through Notch signalling.

    “Contact between cancer cells and fibroblasts can promote the CAF phenotype in breast cancer through Notch signalling55”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strell, C., Paulsson, J., Jin, S.-B., Tobin, N. P., Mezheyeuski, A., Roswall, P., Mutgan, C., Mitsios, N., Johansson, H., Wickberg, S. M., Svedlund, J., Nilsson, M., Hall, P., Mulder, J., Radisky, D. C., Pietras, K., Bergh, J., Lendahl, U., Wärnberg, F., & Östman, A.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Strell, Carina
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2019-02-28
Volume
111
Issue
9
Pages
983-995
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2920295895
Cited by
158
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Swedish Cancer Society (150895)
  • Swedish Research Council (349–2006-160)
  • Radiumhemmets forskningsfonder, EU Caffein ITN network (3047/12)
  • BRECT network of Karolinska Institutet
  • Stockholm County Council
  • Comprehensive Cancer Consortium
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
ductal carcinoma in situ, stromal-epithelial interactions, PDGFR, PDGFRA, PDGFRβ, fibroblast phenotype, local recurrence, JAG1, Notch2, juxtacrine signaling, prognostic factors, breast cancer
MeSH terms
Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Cell Communication, Disease Models, Animal, Epithelial Cells, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Stromal Cells, Receptors, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, Coculture Techniques, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Neoplasm Grading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review