The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news
Abstract
We investigated the prevalence of 5 news frames identified in earlier studies on framing and framing effects: attribution of responsibility, conflict, human interest, economic consequences, and morality. We content analyzed 2,601 newspaper stories and 1,522 television news stories in the period surrounding the Amsterdam meetings of European heads of state in 1997. Our results showed that, overall, the attribution of responsibility frame was most commonly used in the news, followed by the conflict, economic consequences, human interest, and morality frames, respectively. The use of news frames depended on both the type of outlet and the type of topic. Most significant differences were not between media (television vs. the press) but between sensationalist vs. serious types of news outlets. Sober and serious newspapers and television news programs more often used the responsibility and conflict frames in the presentation of news, whereas sensationalist outlets more often used the human interest frame.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
Cited by
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054 · Cited by 3,071
The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity
Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x · Cited by 1,020
Negativity in political news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings
Lengauer, G., Esser, F., & Berganza, R. (2012) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884911427800 · Cited by 287
Framing the sharing economy: Toward a sustainable ecosystem
Leung, X. Y., Xue, L., & Wen, H. (2019) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.021 · Cited by 184
Effects of Lead Framing on Selective Exposure to Internet News Reports
Zillmann, D., Chen, L., Knobloch, S., & Callison, C. (2004) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650203260201 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Semetko, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-109
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2466
- OpenAlex
- W2039551283
- Cited by
- 2,489
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 62.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/joc/50.2.93
- The paper
- Semetko, H. (2000). Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/50.2.93
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
