Cited by 6,544Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

Choices, values, and frames.

Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos·1984·American Psychologist

Abstract

This book presents the definitive exposition of 'prospect theory', a compelling alternative to the classical utility theory of choice. Building on the 1982 volume, Judgement Under Uncertainty, this book brings together seminal papers on prospect theory from economists, decision theorists, and psychologists, including the work of the late Amos Tversky, whose contributions are collected here for the first time. While remaining within a rational choice framework, prospect theory delivers more accurate, empirically verified predictions in key test cases, as well as helping to explain many complex, real-world puzzles. In this volume, it is brought to bear on phenomena as diverse as the principles of legal compensation, the equity premium puzzle in financial markets, and the number of hours that New York cab drivers choose to drive on rainy days. Theoretically elegant and empirically robust, this volume shows how prospect theory has matured into a new science of decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss aversion has been well documented in the laboratory and in many field settings, including high-stakes game show decisions, financial markets, politics, trade policy for declining industries, rate of organ donation for transplant cases, and monkey behavior.

    “Loss aversion has been well documented in the laboratory and in many field settings (2), including high-stakes game show decisions (3), financial markets (4), politics (5), trade policy for declining industries (6), rate of organ donation for transplant cases (7) and has also been evident in monkey behavior (8).”

    From Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion (2010) · cites this paper as [2]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1984-04
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
341-350
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W3123340585
Cited by
6,544
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 164 · 2025: 226 · 2024: 229 · 2023: 228 · 2022: 265 · 2021: 254 · 2020: 332 · 2019: 304 · 2018: 325 · 2017: 261 · 2016: 287 · 2015: 281 · 2014: 274 · 2013: 278 · 2012: 236
FWCI
17.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
prospect theory, utility theory, decision making under risk, Amos Tversky, legal compensation, equity premium puzzle, framing effects, rational choice, judgment under uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review