The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological escapism: predicting the amount of television viewing by need for cognition
Abstract
Germans spend an average of more than 3 hours watching television each day. Among them, there are many who turn on their TV sets for less than 1.5 hours a day, and others who do this for more than 8 hours a day. What accounts for these differences? The central thesis in this paper is that individuals may be distinguished by their attitude toward thinking and that differences in their need for cognition explain the differences in their time spent with TV. The lower viewers' need for cognition is, the less pleasant they feel when they have nothing to do because there is nothing left to do but think. The easiest way for individuals to escape this pressure to think is by watching TV. Thus, individuals will watch more TV when they have a lower need for cognition. Results of a survey study show that the concept of escapism proves to be useful in explaining TV use when it takes over a psychological perspective as well as a sociological one.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.488 · Cited by 2,727
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 · Cited by 2,517 · cited 3×
“Indeed, need for cognition is significantly related to intellectual ability indexes such as verbal intelligence, American College Testing scores, and high schoolcollege grade point averages (for an overview of relationships between need for cognition and other individual differences from over 100 empirical studies see…”
BackgroundInfluentialTelevision uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations
Rubin, A. M. (1983) · Journal of Broadcasting · doi:10.1080/08838158309386471 · Cited by 912 · cited 1×
“In this article, we can mention only marginally a further step in our analysis, in which we entered, in addition to the extensive model described above, seven television-viewing motives adapted from Greenberg (1974), Rubin (1981, 1983, 1984), and Schorr-Neustadt (1994).”
MethodRitualized and Instrumental Television Viewing
Rubin, A. M. (1984) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02174.x · Cited by 679
Cited by
Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior
(2016) · Studies in Information · doi:10.1108/s2055-53772016 · Cited by 1,540
Enjoyment: At the Heart of Media Entertainment
Vorderer, P. (2004) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/14.4.388 · Cited by 979
Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time
Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2007) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213260701301194 · Cited by 376
Hasebrink, U., & Popp, J. (2006) · comm · doi:10.1515/commun.2006.023 · Cited by 340
Social media adoption: The role of media needs and innovation characteristics
Zolkepli, I. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.050 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Henning, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100-120
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2466
- OpenAlex
- W2100256341
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 60.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological escapism: predicting the amount of television viewing by need for cognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/joc/51.1.100
- The paper
- Henning, B. (2001). Psychological escapism: predicting the amount of television viewing by need for cognition. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/51.1.100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
