Cited by 6Complex Network Analysis TechniquesMedia and Digital CommunicationMedia Studies and Communication

Concentration without cumulative advantage: the distribution of news source attention in online communities

Hagar, Nick, Shaw, Aaron·2022·Journal of Communication

Abstract

Many attention markets exhibit stable patterns of concentration, where a few producers attract and sustain a far greater share of the audience than others. This inequality often follows patterns consistent with cumulative advantage, a process in which performance compounds over time. Attention to news sources online possesses these characteristics; however, online audiences also fragment across many disparate news producers. How do social media and recommender systems contribute to these attention dynamics? In this study, we examine two paradigmatic models: concentration driven by cumulative advantage and fragmentation driven by stochasticity. We evaluate these models against a large-scale empirical dataset of news source attention in the popular social media site Reddit. While we find high levels of attention concentration, we do not find the stable popularity over time that characterizes cumulative advantage. Rather, sources gain and lose popularity seemingly at random, aligning with a stochastic model. These results demonstrate the persistence of attention inequality, even in the absence of a strong driving mechanism. They also suggest that social media systems can undermine the accumulation of attention to the most prominent news sources. Digital attention markets striving for more equitable allocation require novel mechanisms of organizing and distributing information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/joc/jqac032

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagar, N., & Shaw, A.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Hagar, Nick
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2022-09-22
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
675-686
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
OpenAlex
W4296676414
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
attention concentration, Matthew effect, social media, recommender systems, Reddit, attention dynamics, audience fragmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review