Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 427

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration Framework

Walker, R. M.·2007·Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
DOI 10.1093/jopart/mum026
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify the antecedents of service, organizational process (organization and marketization), and ancillary innovation types. The drivers of the study are twofold: prior research has not adequately addressed how organizational and environmental antecedents may vary by innovation type, and the impact of complementary relationships between innovation types has not been systematically estimated in public organizations. Data are drawn from a 2-yr multiple informant study of English local authorities. The results of the multivariate analysis show that the antecedents of different innovation types are complex and that complementary relationships between innovation types might not be as widespread as is theorized. Configuration theory is proposed as a framework to move away from examining the myriad of individual variables and toward a consideration of the relationships between antecedents and innovation types. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jopart/mum026

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 1978, Technology Review, 14, 40
  2. 1968, American sociological review, 33, 912, 10.2307/2092683 · DOI
  3. Aiken, 1971, Sociology, 5, 63, 10.1177/003803857100500105 · DOI
  4. 2005, PUBLIC MONEY AND MANAGEMENT, 25, 51
  5. 2005, 83, 639, 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00466.x · DOI
  6. 1995, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 41, 1471, 10.1287/mnsc.41.9.1471 · DOI
  7. 1994, Public administration review, 54, 322, 10.2307/977379 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2001, 22, 83, 10.1504/IJTM.2001.002956 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 1997, BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 8, 119, 10.1111/1467-8551.0045 · DOI
  10. 2007, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 455, 10.1093/jopart/mul007 · DOI
  11. 2005, ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 23, 419, 10.1068/c40m · DOI
  12. 2004, PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 6, 189, 10.1080/1471903042000189092 · DOI
  13. Damanpour, 1987, Journal of Management, 13, 675, 10.1177/014920638701300408 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 34, 555, 10.2307/256406 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 1989, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 26, 587, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00746.x · DOI
  16. 2001, JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 38, 45, 10.1111/1467-6486.00227 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 1984, Administrative science quarterly, 29, 392, 10.2307/2393031 · DOI
  18. 2001, Public administration review, 61, 693, 10.1111/0033-3352.00140 · DOI
  19. 2003, LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 29, 52, 10.1080/03003930308559370 · DOI
  20. 1984, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 30, 682, 10.1287/mnsc.30.6.682 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2006, Public administration review, 66, 168
  22. 1996, 35, 117, 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00053-4 · DOI
  23. 1988, RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR, 10, 169
  24. Kimberly, 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 24, 689, 10.2307/256170 · DOI
  25. 2007, PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 9, 67, 10.1080/14719030601181225 · DOI
  26. 1988, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 31, 897, 10.2307/256344 · DOI
  27. 1986, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 7, 233, 10.1002/smj.4250070305 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 1997, ADMINISTRATION AND SOCIETY, 29, 115, 10.1177/009539979702900201 · DOI
  29. O'Toole, 1999, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 505, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024421 · DOI · Paper page
  30. O'Toole, 2003, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 43, 10.1093/jopart/mug009 · DOI
  31. Roberts, 2003, Organization Science, 14, 107, 10.1287/orsc.14.2.107.14990 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 1996, OMEGA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 6, 631
  33. 2001, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 3, 169, 10.1111/1468-2370.00062 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2003, PUBLIC MONEY AND MANAGEMENT, 23, 93, 10.1080/09540962.2003.10874830 · DOI
  35. 2006, 84, 311, 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x · DOI
  36. 2002, 80, 201, 10.1111/1467-9299.00300 · DOI
  37. Walker, 2004, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 417, 10.1093/jopart/muh022 · DOI
  38. 2006, Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management], 25, 371, 10.1002/pam.20177 · DOI
  39. 2007, 85, 739, 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00667.x · DOI
  40. Wanous, 2001, Organizational Research Methods, 4, 361, 10.1177/109442810144003 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2003, LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 29, 75, 10.1080/714004181 · DOI

Cited by

See all 427

Metadata

Authors
Walker, R. M.
Venue
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2007-10-17
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
591-615
ISSN
  • 1053-1858 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9803
DOI
10.1093/jopart/mum026
OpenAlex
W2033955815
Cited by
427
References
2
FWCI
18.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.