The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Misplaced Trust? Exploring the Structure of the E-Government-Citizen Trust Relationship
Open accessAbstract
A growing body of research focuses on the relationship between e-government, the relatively new mode of citizen-to-government contact founded in information and communications technologies, and citizen trust in government. For many, including both academics and policymakers, e-government is seen as a potentially transformational medium, a mode of contact that could dramatically improve citizen perceptions of government service delivery, and possibly reverse the long-running decline in citizen trust in government. To date, however, the literature has left significant gaps in our understanding of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. This study intends to fill some of these gaps. Using a cross-sectional sample of 787 end-users of U.S. federal government services, data from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) study, and structural equation modeling statistical techniques, this study explores the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. Included in the model are factors influencing the decision to adopt e-government, as well as prior expectations, overall satisfaction, and outcomes including both confidence in the particular agency experienced and trust in the federal government overall. The findings suggest that while e-government may help improve citizens’ confidence in the future performance of the agency experienced, it does not yet lead to greater satisfaction with an agency interaction, nor does it correlate with greater generalized trust in the federal government overall. Explanations for these findings, including an assessment of the potential of e-government to help rebuild trust in government in the future, are offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction
Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151722 · Cited by 2,914
Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust
Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0015 · Cited by 2,516
Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government
Welch, E. W. (2004) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui021 · Cited by 1,222
The Effects of E‐Government on Trust and Confidence in Government
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x · Cited by 1,092
Cited by
The Effect of Transparency on Trust in Government: A Cross‐National Comparative Experiment
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12047 · Cited by 608
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mus048 · Cited by 678
A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector
Mergel, I. (2013) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015 · Cited by 522
Citizens' adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9613-y · Cited by 373
Citizens’ Use of Social Media in Government, Perceived Transparency, and Trust in Government
Song, C., & Lee, J. (2016) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgeson, F. V., VanAmburg, D., & Mithas, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-04-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257-283
- ISSN
- 1053-1858 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9803
- OpenAlex
- W1991273837
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 98.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Misplaced Trust? Exploring the Structure of the E-Government-Citizen Trust Relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jopart/muq006
- The paper
- Morgeson, F. V., VanAmburg, D., & Mithas, S. (2011). Misplaced Trust? Exploring the Structure of the E-Government-Citizen Trust Relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.