CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 120Injury Epidemiology and PreventionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unintentional Injury in Preschool Boys With and Without Early Onset of Disruptive Behavior

Schwebel, D. C.·2002·Journal of Pediatric Psychology
DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/27.8.727
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine subsequent risk of unintentional injury among preschool boys diagnosed with ODD, boys with comorbid ODD and ADHD, and boys matched demographically to the clinical sample; to test predictive validity of a measure of injury proneness; and to examine factors that might predict injury beyond clinic status. METHODS: Seventy-nine consecutive clinic-referred preschool-age boys and 76 demographically matched boys without disruptive behavior participated in a 2-year prospective longitudinal design. Time 1 assessment included clinical diagnosis, parent-reported injury proneness, attachment, and verbal abilities. Injury history was measured 1 and 2 years later. RESULTS: Clinic-referred children had more injuries than the comparison group. Children with comorbid ODD and ADHD had approximately the same injury rate as those with ODD but not ADHD. Parent-reported injury proneness was unrelated to subsequent injuries. Neither attachment nor verbal ability predicted injury significantly beyond clinic status. CONCLUSIONS: Children with early disruptive behavior are at increased risk of unintentional injury and therefore should be considered prime candidates for injury prevention campaigns.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/27.8.727

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schwebel, D. C.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Schwebel, D. C.
ORCID
Schwebel, D. C.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2002-12-01
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
727-737
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
DOI
10.1093/jpepsy/27.8.727
OpenAlex
W2103197603
Cited by
120
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH4537)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
unintentional injuries, preschool boys, oppositional defiant disorder, ADHD comorbidity, disruptive behavior, injury risk, attachment, verbal ability, injury prevention, clinic-referred children
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Preschool, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Wounds and Injuries, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review