The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-Term Behavior Problems Following Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Prevalence, Predictors, and Correlates
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To study identified rates of long-term behavior problems in children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to children with only orthopedic injuries and risk factors and correlates for new behavior problems following TBI. METHODS: Sample included children with severe TBI (n = 42), moderate TBI (n = 41), and orthopedic injuries only (ORTHO;n = 50). The baseline assessment measured child behavior, adaptation, and neuropsychological, academic, and family functioning. Follow-ups were conducted at 6 and 12 months and at an extended follow-up a mean of 4 years after injury. RESULTS: The prevalence of caseness, defined as elevated behavior problem ratings, was higher in one or both TBI groups than in the ORTHO group at each follow-up (e.g., 36% of severe TBI group, 22% of moderate TBI group, and 10% of ORTHO group at extended follow-up). Most instances of postinjury-onset caseness at the extended follow-up were evident within the first year after TBI. Predictors were severe TBI, socioeconomic disadvantage, and preinjury behavioral concerns. Concurrent correlates included weakness in working memory and adaptive behavior skills, poorer behavior and school competence, and adverse family outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Postinjury-onset caseness is persistent, risks are multifactorial, and correlates include child dysfunction and family sequelae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report.
Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700048017 · Cited by 6,650
Cited by
Anderson, V., Brown, S., Newitt, H., & Hoile, H. (2009) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e3181ada830 · Cited by 172
Giza, C. C., Griesbach, G. S., & Hovda, D. A. (2005) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2004.06.003 · Cited by 135
Zatzick, D., Russo, J., Lord, S. P., Varley, C., Wang, J., Berliner, L., Jurkovich, G., Whiteside, L. K., O’Connor, S., & Rivara, F. P. (2014) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4784 · Cited by 108
Wade, S. L., Stancin, T., Kirkwood, M., Brown, T. M., McMullen, K. M., & Taylor, H. G. (2014) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e31828f9fe8 · Cited by 97
Wade, S. L., Walz, N. C., Carey, J., McMullen, K. M., Cass, J., Mark, E., & Yeates, K. O. (2012) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028440 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Psychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 251-263
- ISSN
- 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2139897672
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.