Cited by 172Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Educational, Vocational, Psychosocial, and Quality‐of‐Life Outcomes for Adult Survivors of Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury

Anderson, Vicki, Brown, Sandra, Newitt, Heidi, Hoile, Hannah·2009·Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine long-term outcomes from child traumatic brain injury (TBI) and relevance of injury severity. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional design. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty-four young adult survivors of childhood TBI (81 men), aged 18 to 30 years at evaluation (mean = 23.5, SD = 2.9), with injury on average 13.7 years prior to evaluation divided according to injury severity: mild (n = 60), moderate (n = 27), and severe (n = 37). MAIN MEASURES: Questionnaires assessed educational and employment status, psychosocial function, and quality-of-life issues. RESULTS: Functional difficulties persisted into adulthood. Injury severity was a particularly strong predictor of long-term outcomes, with environmental factors playing a less consistent role. Survivors of severe TBI were particularly vulnerable, demonstrating global impairment: poorer school performance, employment difficulties, poor quality of life, and increased risk of mental health problems. Mild and moderate TBI were more benign, although lower educational attainment and employment status were identified, and moderate TBI was associated with late developing mental health issues. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic brain injury is a lifelong problem, compromising the individual's capacity to meet developmental expectations across a wide range of functional domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/htr.0b013e3181ada830

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, V., Brown, S., Newitt, H., & Hoile, H.
Affiliations
Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
Venue
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Published
2009-09
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
303-312
ISSN
0885-9701 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009355338
Cited by
172
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
pediatric traumatic brain injury, adult survivors, long-term outcomes, injury severity, educational attainment, employment status, psychosocial functioning, quality of life, mental illness, functional disability, environmental factors
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Mental Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Special, Educational Status, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Retrospective Studies, Social Adjustment, Socioeconomic Factors, Victoria, Injury Severity Score, Survivors, Brain Injury, Chronic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review