Cited by 72Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareHealth Education and Validation

Controlled evaluation of the STARBRIGHT CD-ROM program for children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis

Davis, M. A.·2004·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the STARBRIGHT Fitting Cystic Fibrosis Into Your Life Everyday CD-ROM. Data were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the program as an educational tool for children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: Forty-seven children and adolescents with CF between the ages of 7 and 17 years were enrolled in the study. Participants completed an initial evaluation of CF-related knowledge and coping skills and were then randomly assigned to one of two groups: the treatment group or the wait-list control group. Participants then viewed the CD-ROM, and researchers completed posttest measures. RESULTS: Analyses indicated that both disease-related knowledge and coping strategies generated by children and adolescents with CF improved as a result of the intervention and that this effect was replicated in the wait-list group. CONCLUSIONS: In sum, the results of the current study indicate that the STARBRIGHT CD-ROM program is a promising intervention for increasing CF-related knowledge and the competence of children's and adolescents' coping strategies. These positive results are enhanced by the brief, inexpensive, and portable nature of this educational program.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsh026

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Davis 2004 is an RCT to assess the effectiveness of an educational tool for children and adolescents with CF for improving knowledge and coping skills, i.e. wrong outcomes.

    “This is an RCT to assess the effectiveness of an educational tool for children and adolescents with CF for improving knowledge and coping skills (i.e.wrong outcomes).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
259-267
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2137559946
Cited by
72
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, CD-ROM, educational intervention, children and adolescents, disease knowledge, coping strategies, self-management, health education
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Child, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Humans, Male, Software, CD-ROM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review