Cited by 38Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesNursing care and researchChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Self-management education for cystic fibrosis

Open access
Savage, Eileen, Beirne, Paul V, Ni Chroinin, Muireann, Duff, Alistair, Fitzgerald, Tony, Farrell, Dawn·2014·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd007641.pub3

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Cottrell 1996 trial, the mean (SD) baseline weight was 89.15 (29.29) lb in the intervention group and 101.4 (32.17) lb in the control group, indicating a clinically important baseline imbalance for CF.

    “As highlighted in a previous Cochrane Review (Savage 2014), in one trial, the mean (SD) baseline weight measurement for participants in the intervention group was 89.15 (29.29) lb and for participants in the control group was 101.4 (32.17) lb, which, for CF, indicates a clinically important baseline imbalance (Cottrell 1996).”

    From Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis (2023) · cites this paper as Savage 2014

    The Characteristics of included studies section reports the Cottrell 1996 baseline weights and calls their difference a clinically important imbalance for CF. However, it gives the intervention-group mean as 89.5 lb, not the claimed 89.15 lb; the SD and control-group figures match. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous Cochrane Reviews on adherence and CF-specific reviews have not used a coding framework, so this review has improved on existing methodologies.

    “Previous Cochrane Reviews on adherence (Nieuwlaat 2014) and CF-specific reviews (Goldbeck 2014; Savage 2014) have not used a coding framework, so this review has improved on existing methodologies.”
  • In contrast to Savage 2014, the review judged two studies to have a high risk of bias from incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), whereas Savage 2014 judged them to have an unclear risk of bias for this domain.

    “In contrast to the Savage 2014 review, we judged these two studies to have a high risk of bias from incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), whereas Savage 2014 judged them to have an unclear risk of bias for this domain.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

5 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. treatment to increase calorie intake in toddlers with cystic fibrosis. Children's Health Care 2003;32(4):297-311.
  2. Quittner AL, Romero SL, Blackwell LS, Romero CV, Marciel KK, Dawkins K, et al.Preliminary results on the efficacy of an online social network for adolescents with CF: age and disease severity group comparisons. Pediatric Pulmonology 2012;47(Suppl 35):388. References to studies awaiting assessment Bergman 2007 {published data only} Bergmann D, Farmer G, Moss R. CF.DOC -A Web-based Interactive Model of Care. Cystic Fibrosis Worldwide 2007; 9:22-5.
  3. Search Strategy: Embase (Elsevier) Date of Search 03 February 2014 Years Covered January 1990 to January 2014 Complete Strategy 1. cystic fibrosis. ti,ab,de. 2. mucoviscidosis. ti,ab,de. 3. 1 or 2 4. 'clinical trial'. ti,ab,de.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savage, E., Beirne, P. V., Ni Chroinin, M., Duff, A., Fitzgerald, T., & Farrell, D.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Cork University Hospital; Division of Children's Services; Cork Ireland
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-08
Volume
2017
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W4211049266
Cited by
38
References
65
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Health Research Board
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, self-management education, patient education, self-care, disease management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review