Cited by 69Doping in SportsEating Disorders and BehaviorsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

A Mediation Analysis of the ATHENA Intervention for Female Athletes: Prevention of Athletic-Enhancing Substance Use and Unhealthy Weight Loss Behaviors

Open access
Ranby, K. W, Aiken, L. S, MacKinnon, D. P, Elliot, D. L, Moe, E. L, McGinnis, W., Goldberg, L.·2009·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explain, through mediation analyses, the mechanisms by which ATHENA (Athletes Targeting Healthy Exercise and Nutrition Alternatives), a primary prevention and health promotion intervention designed to deter unhealthy body shaping behaviors among female high school athletes, produced immediate changes in intentions for unhealthy weight loss and steroid/creatine use, and to examine the link to long-term follow-up intentions and behaviors. METHODS: In a randomized trial of 1668 athletes, intervention participants completed coach-led peer-facilitated sessions during their sport season. Participants provided pre-test, immediate post-test, and 9-month follow-up assessments. RESULTS: ATHENA decreased intentions for steroid/creatine use and intentions for unhealthy weight loss behaviors at post-test. These effects were most strongly mediated by social norms and self-efficacy for healthy eating. Low post-test intentions were maintained 9 months later and predicted subsequent behavior. CONCLUSIONS: ATHENA successfully modified mediators that in turn related to athletic-enhancing substance use and unhealthy weight loss practices. Mediation analyses aid in the understanding of health promotion interventions and inform program development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp025

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ranby et al. included creatine with anabolic steroids in the same category when describing changes in a survey designed to determine the intention or knowledge of using performance enhancing substances.

    “Ranby et al. (101) included creatine with anabolic steroids in the same category when describing changes in a survey designed to determine the intention or knowledge of using performance enhancing substances.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ranby, K. W., Aiken, L. S., MacKinnon, D. P., Elliot, D. L., Moe, E. L., McGinnis, W., & Goldberg, L.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2009-04-22
Volume
34
Issue
10
Pages
1069-1083
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2103592903
Cited by
69
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA07356, DA 09757, R01DA009757, R01DA007356)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
female high school athletes, anabolic steroid use, primary prevention, health promotion, social norms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Basketball, Body Image, Creatine, Doping in Sports, Female, Health Education, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Models, Psychological, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Peer Group, Soccer, Social Values, Sports, Steroids, Weight Loss, Self Efficacy, Volleyball, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review