Cited by 65Diabetes Management and EducationFamily and Disability Support ResearchFamily Support in Illness

Risk factors associated with depressive symptoms in caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes or cystic fibrosis

Open access
Driscoll, K. A., Johnson, S. B., Barker, D., Quittner, A. L., Deeb, L. C., Geller, D. E., Gondor, M., Silverstein, J. H.·2010·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate depressive symptoms in caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or cystic fibrosis (CF) and identify associated risk factors. METHODS: A total of 195 caregivers completed demographic, stress, and depressive symptoms questionnaires. Children's health status was obtained from medical records. RESULTS: Approximately 33% of caregivers reported elevated symptoms of depression (i.e., exceeded clinical cutoff of 16 on the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale). For caregivers of children with T1D, elevations were associated with less caregiver education, more family stress, older child age, and worse glycemic control. For caregivers of children with CF, more family stress and lack of employment outside of the home were associated with elevated depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Many caregivers of children with T1D or CF experience depressive symptoms, although risk factors may differ in these two populations. Screening of caregiver depressive symptoms as part of routine clinic visits may provide opportunities for needed intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp138

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Driscoll, K. A., Johnson, S. B., Barker, D., Quittner, A. L., Deeb, L. C., Geller, D. E., Gondor, M., & Silverstein, J. H.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2010-01-22
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
814-822
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2103455150
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL069736)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
caregiver depression, depressive symptoms, type 1 diabetes, cystic fibrosis, children with chronic illness, family stress, caregiver education, glycemic control, employment status, risk factors, depression screening
MeSH terms
Child, Cystic Fibrosis, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Health Status, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review