Cited by 86Family Support in IllnessAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcarePediatric Pain Management Techniques

Meta-analysis: Caregiver and youth uncertainty in pediatric chronic illness

Open access
Szulczewski, Lauren, Mullins, Larry L., Bidwell, Sarah L., Eddington, Angelica R., Pai, Ahna L. H.·2017·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a systematic review on the construct of illness uncertainty in caregivers and youth as related to the following: demographic and illness variables, psychological functioning, illness-related distress, and reaction/coping style. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted with articles assessing the associations between illness uncertainty and variables of interest that were published between November 1983 and June 2016 ( n = 58). Results: Psychological functioning and illness-related distress had primarily medium effect sizes. Demographic and illness variables had small effect sizes. More positive and fewer negative reaction/coping styles were associated with less illness uncertainty, with primarily small effects. Conclusions: Illness uncertainty may be an important factor that influences psychological functioning and distress and coping in the context of pediatric chronic illness. However, additional research is needed to determine more precise mean effect sizes, as well as the potential efficacy of intervention to address uncertainty. adolescents, children, chronic illness, coping skills and adjustment, meta-analysis, parents, psychosocial functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw097

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis found parents who report their child's condition as more uncertain tend to report higher levels of anxiety.

    “a meta-analysis finding parents who report their child's condition as more uncertain tend to report higher levels of anxiety (Szulczewski et al., 2017).”

    From Parental Anxiety and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Pediatric Food Allergy. (2021) · cites this paper as Szulczewski et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szulczewski, L., Mullins, L. L., Bidwell, S. L., Eddington, A. R., & Pai, A. L. H.
Affiliations
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Corresponding author
Szulczewski, Lauren
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2017-02-08
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
395-421
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2794695913
Cited by
86
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIH
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
illness uncertainty, children with chronic illness, caregivers, adolescents, psychological functioning, coping styles, psychosocial adjustment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Child, Chronic Disease, Humans, Parents, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review