Cited by 18Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Pain acceptance in adolescents: Development of a short form of the CPAQ-A

Open access
Gauntlett-Gilbert, Jeremy, Alamire, Batool, Duggan, Geoffrey B·2019·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Acceptance of pain is a predictor of pain-related disability and treatment outcome in adolescents with pain. This variable has been previously measured using the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire for Adolescents (CPAQ-A, McCracken, Gauntlett-Gilbert, & Eccleston, European Journal of Pain, 14, 316-320, 2010). We set out to create a short, eight-item, form of this instrument that retained its factor structure and clinical utility. METHODS: We used data collected from two independent samples of adolescents attending residential treatment for disabling chronic pain (N = 187 and N = 159). Both groups completed the 20-item CPAQ-A and indices of functioning and distress. We carried out item reduction and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the first sample, repeating this on the second sample and examining the new scale's correlations with clinically relevant variables. RESULTS: An eight-item scale was created with four items assigned to each established factor (Pain Willingness and Activity Engagement). CFA confirmed this factor structure and it replicated in Sample 2. The new scale (the CPAQ-A8) was sensitive to treatment and correlated as well with clinically important variables as its full-length version. Some items in the new scale differed from the adult CPAQ-8. CONCLUSIONS: Measures of pain acceptance have been previously developed and validated in pediatric and adult samples. This study showed that pain acceptance can be indexed by a brief, yet factorially valid, short form of the CPAQ-A that uses fewer than 50% of the items of the full-length scale and has demonstrated acceptable validity and sensitivity-to-treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy090

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gauntlett-Gilbert, J., Alamire, B., & Duggan, G. B.
Affiliations
  • Bath Centre for Pain Services, Royal United Hospitals Bath, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases
  • Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases (GB)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2018-11-28
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
453-462
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2902441438
Cited by
18
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
pain acceptance, adolescents, short-form scale development, chronic pain, factor structure, pain-related disability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review