Drivers of regulatory reform in Canadian health professions: Institutional isomorphism in a shifting social context
Abstract
Research has documented how the decline in professional self-regulation in the UK and Australia was led by policy-makers in response to regulatory failures. In Canada, professional self-regulation is currently in decline as well, and while policy-makers have driven some change it is also the case that self-regulating professions have begun to transform themselves from within: altering their structure, make-up, and processes to enhance fairness, public input, and accountability, while reducing professional control. Why would they do so? This paper draws on the concept of institutional isomorphism to understand why professional regulators would invoke changes that, on the surface, might seem to counteract their own interests. Analysing data from 46 interviews with leaders in healthcare profession regulation, this paper examines how coercive, mimetic, and normative processes drive regulatory reform in a changing regulatory field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The increase in sources focused on regulatory structures reflects a growing emphasis on efficiency, accountability, and transparency in this field.
“The number of sources focused on regulatory structures have steadily increased since 2010, reflecting a growing emphasis on efficiency, accountability, and transparency in this field [5,12,51,94,198,208].”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Despite trends toward umbrella legislation in some Canadian jurisdictions and the amalgamation of regulatory bodies of different professions, there is little literature comparing regulation across professions.
“Despite trends toward umbrella legislation in some Canadian jurisdictions and the amalgamation of regulatory bodies of different professions [5,198,208], there is little literature comparing regulation across professions.”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Growing emphasis on performance measurement and accountability.
“Given the growing emphasis on performance measurement and accountability [5,12,46,113,115,117,198,205,224]”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Another recent and drastic shift in regulatory governance is the amalgamation of regulatory bodies within and across professions to increase efficiency which is represented in the literature within our review.
“Another recent and drastic shift in regulatory governance is the amalgamation of regulatory bodies within and across professions to increase efficiency which is represented in the literature within our review [5,12,16,52,112,198,208,209].”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
These concerns are reflected in the literature as evidenced by sources discussing regulatory accountability and oversight and regulatory philosophies such as principle-based, right-touch, risk-based, or relational regulation.
“These concerns are reflected in the literature as evidenced by sources discussing regulatory accountability and oversight [5,12,46,113,115,117,198] and regulatory philosophies such as principle-based, right-touch, risk-based, or relational regulation [16,51,53,56,196,205,208].”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
The strong representation of this topic in the literature is likely driven by recent and upcoming legislative and voluntary governance changes across Canadian regulatory jurisdictions, reflecting the broader trend of regulatory modernization in Canada.
“The strong representation of this topic in the literature is likely driven by recent and upcoming legislative [5] and voluntary governance changes across Canadian regulatory jurisdictions, reflecting the broader trend of regulatory modernization in Canada [12,205].”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Discussions and critiques about these policy trends have shown up in our review, which signals some alignment between regulatory scholarship and practice.
“Discussions and critiques about these policy trends have shown up in our review, which signals some alignment between regulatory scholarship and practice [5,50,95,115,205].”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
In Canada, recent legislative changes in British Columbia require health practitioner regulators to implement specific anti-discrimination and support measures.
“In Canada, recent legislative changes in British Columbia require health practitioner regulators to implement specific anti-discrimination and support measures [5,12]”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
The included sources speaking to anti-discrimination, anti-racism, or diversity, equity, and inclusion topics focus on this province exclusively.
“and the included sources speaking to anti-discrimination, anti-racism, or diversity, equity, and inclusion topics focus on this province exclusively [5,12,192,216].”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts
Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198713395.001.0001 · Cited by 936 · see citing works
Recent research into healthcare professions regulation: a rapid evidence assessment
Browne, J., Bullock, A., Poletti, C., & Cserző, D. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06946-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Leslie, K., Nelson, S., Deber, R., & Gilmour, J. (2018) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(17)30180-1 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review
Chiu, P., Thiessen, N. J., Idrees, S., Leslie, K., & Kung, J. Y. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323716 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Discussions and critiques about these policy trends have shown up in our review, which signals some alignment between regulatory scholarship and practice [5,50,95,115,205].”
Influential
- Authors
- Adams, T. L.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Adams, Tracey L
- ORCID
- Adams, Tracey L
- Venue
- Journal of Professions and Organization
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-10-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 318-332
- ISSN
- 2051-8803 (ISSN-L)
- 2051-8811
- OpenAlex
- W4311794317
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Professions and Organization (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
- Keywords
- professional self-regulation, regulatory reform, institutional isomorphism, health professions regulation, coercive isomorphism, mimetic isomorphism, normative isomorphism, professional control, regulatory accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review