Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Arsenate- and Vanadate-Associated Changes of Electrical Membrane Potential and Phosphate Transport in Lemna gibba G1

ULLRICH-EBERIUS, C. I., SANZ, A., NOVACKY, A. J.·1989·Journal of Experimental Botany

Abstract

Interference of arsenate and vanadate with phosphate uptake in Lemna gibba L. was studied by measuring voltage changes and (32P)phosphate uptake. Arsenate proved to be competitive with the highand low-affinity phosphate uptake system. It induced transient membrane potential changes of up to 120 mV which were similar to those induced by phosphate and indicated a cotransport mechanism with at least 2H+/H2As04. The amplitude of the transient arsenate-induced membrane depolarization was strongly influenced by phosphate starvation. A permanent membrane depolarization to the diffusion potential was achieved within 2 to 6 h in P-starved plants. Thus, arsenate is indeed a strongly competitive physiological analogue of phosphate in higher plants. Vanadate was easily transported into L. gibba as concluded from transient Em changes of up to 110 mV. Vanadate interfered only slightly and non-specifically with the two phosphate transport mechanisms. Like phosphate, vanadate uptake seems to be an H+-cotransport mechanism, both with similar optima at pH 6 0. Unlike phosphate uptake, vanadate-linked membrane depolarization was not affected by high intracellular phosphate concentrations. P-starvation did not enhance the weak long-term effect on Em. Hence, vanadate, in contrast to arsenate, is not regarded as a physiological phosphate analogue. The distinct and rapid vanadate-induced and permanent membrane depolarization of Avena sativa, Triticum aestivum and Glycine max leaves was not seen in Lemna nor in leaves of Gossypium hirsutum and Nicotiana tabacum. Plasmalemma-enriched preparations of L. gibba revealed, however, a high vanadate-sensitive ATPase activity (87%). As a possible explanation for these differences it is suggested that the latter plant species have cytosolic vanadate-detoxifying properties, i.e. they can reduce vanadate to vanadyl ions, in contrast to the former group of plant species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jxb/40.1.119

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
ULLRICH-EBERIUS, C. I., SANZ, A., & NOVACKY, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
1989
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
119-128
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W2099471889
Cited by
300
References
0
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Arsenate- and Vanadate-Associated Changes of Electrical Membrane Potential and Phosphate Transport in Lemna gibba G1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/40.1.119
The paper
ULLRICH-EBERIUS, C. I., SANZ, A., & NOVACKY, A. J. (1989). Evaluation of Arsenate- and Vanadate-Associated Changes of Electrical Membrane Potential and Phosphate Transport in Lemna gibba G1. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/40.1.119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.