The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Arsenate- and Vanadate-Associated Changes of Electrical Membrane Potential and Phosphate Transport in Lemna gibba G1
Abstract
Interference of arsenate and vanadate with phosphate uptake in Lemna gibba L. was studied by measuring voltage changes and (32P)phosphate uptake. Arsenate proved to be competitive with the highand low-affinity phosphate uptake system. It induced transient membrane potential changes of up to 120 mV which were similar to those induced by phosphate and indicated a cotransport mechanism with at least 2H+/H2As04. The amplitude of the transient arsenate-induced membrane depolarization was strongly influenced by phosphate starvation. A permanent membrane depolarization to the diffusion potential was achieved within 2 to 6 h in P-starved plants. Thus, arsenate is indeed a strongly competitive physiological analogue of phosphate in higher plants. Vanadate was easily transported into L. gibba as concluded from transient Em changes of up to 110 mV. Vanadate interfered only slightly and non-specifically with the two phosphate transport mechanisms. Like phosphate, vanadate uptake seems to be an H+-cotransport mechanism, both with similar optima at pH 6 0. Unlike phosphate uptake, vanadate-linked membrane depolarization was not affected by high intracellular phosphate concentrations. P-starvation did not enhance the weak long-term effect on Em. Hence, vanadate, in contrast to arsenate, is not regarded as a physiological phosphate analogue. The distinct and rapid vanadate-induced and permanent membrane depolarization of Avena sativa, Triticum aestivum and Glycine max leaves was not seen in Lemna nor in leaves of Gossypium hirsutum and Nicotiana tabacum. Plasmalemma-enriched preparations of L. gibba revealed, however, a high vanadate-sensitive ATPase activity (87%). As a possible explanation for these differences it is suggested that the latter plant species have cytosolic vanadate-detoxifying properties, i.e. they can reduce vanadate to vanadyl ions, in contrast to the former group of plant species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhao, F.-J., McGrath, S. P., & Meharg, A. A. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112152 · Cited by 1,246
Arsenic uptake and metabolism in plants
Zhao, F. J., Ma, J. F., Meharg, A. A., & McGrath, S. P. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02716.x · Cited by 1,185
Approaches for Improving Crop Competitiveness Through the Manipulation of Fertilization Strategies
Di Tomaso, J. M. (1995) · Weed Science · doi:10.1017/s0043174500081522 · Cited by 308
Arsenic uptake and speciation in the rootless duckweed Wolffia globosa
Zhang, X., Zhao, F., Huang, Q., Williams, P. N., Sun, G., & Zhu, Y. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02758.x · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- ULLRICH-EBERIUS, C. I., SANZ, A., & NOVACKY, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-128
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2099471889
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Arsenate- and Vanadate-Associated Changes of Electrical Membrane Potential and Phosphate Transport in Lemna gibba G1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/40.1.119
- The paper
- ULLRICH-EBERIUS, C. I., SANZ, A., & NOVACKY, A. J. (1989). Evaluation of Arsenate- and Vanadate-Associated Changes of Electrical Membrane Potential and Phosphate Transport in Lemna gibba G1. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/40.1.119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.