The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imaging of chlorophyll a fluorescence: theoretical and practical aspects of an emerging technique for the monitoring of photosynthetic performance
Abstract
The development of chlorophyll (Chl) a fluorescence imaging systems has greatly increased the versatility of Chl a fluorometry as a non-invasive technique for the investigation of photosynthesis in plants and algae. For example, systems that image at the microscopic level have made it possible to measure PSII photochemical efficiencies from chloroplasts within intact leaves and from individual algal cells within mixed populations, while systems that image over much larger areas have been used to investigate heterogeneous patterns of photosynthetic performance across leaves and in screening programmes that image tens or even hundreds of plants simultaneously. In addition, it is now practical to use fluorescence imaging systems as real-time, multi-channel fluorometers, which can be used to record continuous fluorescence traces from multiple leaves, plants, or algal cells. This paper discusses some of the theoretical and practical issues associated with the imaging of Chl a fluorescence and with Chl a fluorometry in general. This discussion includes a review of the most commonly used Chl a fluorescence parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide
Maxwell, K., & Johnson, G. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 · Cited by 9,347
Niyogi, K. K., Bjorkman, O., & Grossman, A. R. (1997) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.9.8.1369 · Cited by 326 · cited 1×
“…colonies with altered thylakoid electrochemical gradient (Bennoun and Beal, 1997), screening for non-photochemical mutants of Chlamydomonas sp. (Niyogi et al., 1997) and Arabidopsis sp. (Niyogi et al., 1998) and the detection of herbicide effects on the maximum ef®ciency of PSII photochemistry…”
Background
Cited by
Primary Metabolism and Plant Defense—Fuel for the Fire
Bolton, M. D. (2009) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-22-5-0487 · Cited by 888
Frequently asked questions about in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence: practical issues
Kalaji, H. M., Schansker, G., Ladle, R. J., Goltsev, V., Bosa, K., Allakhverdiev, S. I., Brestic, M., Bussotti, F., Calatayud, A., Dąbrowski, P., et al. (2014) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-014-0024-6 · Cited by 832
Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in vegetation: 50 years of progress
Mohammed, G. H., Colombo, R., Middleton, E. M., Rascher, U., van der Tol, C., Nedbal, L., Goulas, Y., Pérez-Priego, O., Damm, A., Meroni, M., et al. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.030 · Cited by 747
The polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence rise measured under high intensity of exciting light
Lazár, D. (2006) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp05095 · Cited by 337
Fu, W., Li, P., & Wu, Y. (2012) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2011.12.004 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Oxborough, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-23
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 400
- Pages
- 1195-1205
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2112120236
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging of chlorophyll a fluorescence: theoretical and practical aspects of an emerging technique for the monitoring of photosynthetic performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erh145
- The paper
- Oxborough, K. (2004). Imaging of chlorophyll a fluorescence: theoretical and practical aspects of an emerging technique for the monitoring of photosynthetic performance. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.