The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of different light intensities on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and yield in lettuce
Open accessAbstract
The worldwide demand for Romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is increasing. Regulation measures of supplementary or shading light are often used in the production of lettuce in some regions. However, inconsistent results on light saturation point of lettuce from previous studies did not facilitate the regulation of light intensity. In the present study, the effects of different light intensities on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and yield in lettuce were investigated. The results show that in the 100 and 800 μmol m−2 s−1 treatments, the values of qP, ΦPSII, and ETR were low, resulting in low light use efficiency and plant yield in lettuce. In the 200, 400, and 600 μmol m−2 s−1 treatments, the values of qP, ΦPSII, and ETR were high, resulting in high light use efficiency and plant yield in lettuce. Light-use efficiency in the 200 μmol m−2 s−1 treatment was the highest, whereas plant yield in the 600 μmol m−2 s−1 treatment was the highest. No significant difference in plant yield was observed between the 400 and 600 μmol m−2 s−1 treatment. In addition, judging by the values of Fv/Fm, the lettuce samples were under rather serious stress in the 800 μmol m−2 s−1 treatment, whereas they were under mild stress in the 600 μmol m−2 s−1 treatment. Based on these results, an optimal regulation strategy of light intensity that can maximize economic benefits for lettuce growers in some regions of the world is proposed. That is the range of 400–600 μmol m−2 s−1 is a recommendable light intensity for production of certain types of lettuce, and light intensity of 400 μmol m−2 s−1 can be an optimal value of supplementary light for winter greenhouse production of certain types of lettuce in higher latitudes, while light intensity of 600 μmol m−2 s−1 can be an optimal value of shading light for late spring and early autumn production of certain types of lettuce in lower latitudes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide
Maxwell, K., & Johnson, G. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 · Cited by 9,347
Genty, B., Briantais, J.-M., & Baker, N. R. (1989) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/s0304-4165(89)80016-9 · Cited by 8,644
The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology
van Kooten, O., & Snel, J. F. H. (1990) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/bf00033156 · Cited by 2,329
New Fluorescence Parameters for the Determination of QA Redox State and Excitation Energy Fluxes
Kramer, D. M., Johnson, G., Kiirats, O., & Edwards, G. E. (2004) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1023/b:pres.0000015391.99477.0d · Cited by 1,801
Rapid light curves: A powerful tool to assess photosynthetic activity
Ralph, P. J., & Gademann, R. (2005) · Aquatic Botany · doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.02.006 · Cited by 1,180
Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce
Li, Q., & Kubota, C. (2009) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.011 · Cited by 914
Characterisation of polyphenols and antioxidant properties of five lettuce varieties and escarole
Llorach, R., Martínez-Sánchez, A., Tomás-Barberán, F. A., Gil, M. I., & Ferreres, F. (2008) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.11.032 · Cited by 525
Hendrickson, L., Furbank, R. T., & Chow, W. S. (2004) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1023/b:pres.0000040446.87305.f4 · Cited by 458
Rapid light curves: A new fluorescence method to assess the state of the photosynthetic apparatus
White, A. J., & Critchley, C. (1999) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1023/a:1006188004189 · Cited by 423
Ben-Amotz, A., & Avron, M. (1983) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.72.3.593 · Cited by 363
Cited by
Lin, K.-H., Huang, M.-Y., Huang, W.-D., Hsu, M.-H., Yang, Z.-W., & Yang, C.-M. (2013) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2012.10.002 · Cited by 740
Improving vegetable quality in controlled environments
Rouphael, Y., Kyriacou, M. C., Petropoulos, S. A., De Pascale, S., & Colla, G. (2018) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.033 · Cited by 333
Carotti, L., Graamans, L., Puksic, F., Butturini, M., Meinen, E., Heuvelink, E., & Stanghellini, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.592171 · Cited by 128
Rouphael, Y., Petropoulos, S. A., El-Nakhel, C., Pannico, A., Kyriacou, M. C., Giordano, M., Troise, A. D., Vitaglione, P., & De Pascale, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01305 · Cited by 31
Saapilin, N. S., Yong, W. T. L., Cheong, B. E., Kamaruzaman, K. A., & Rodrigues, K. F. (2022) · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture · doi:10.1186/s40538-022-00293-4 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, W., Li, P., & Wu, Y.
- Venue
- Scientia Horticulturae
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 135
- Pages
- 45-51
- ISSN
- 0304-4238 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969980386
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of different light intensities on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and yield in lettuce. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.12.004
- The paper
- Fu, W., Li, P., & Wu, Y. (2012). Effects of different light intensities on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and yield in lettuce. Scientia Horticulturae. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.12.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.