The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture
Abstract
Drought is one of the greatest limitations to crop expansion outside the present-day agricultural areas. It will become increasingly important in regions of the globe where, in the past, the problem was negligible, due to the recognized changes in global climate. Today the concern is with improving cultural practices and crop genotypes for drought-prone areas; therefore, understanding the mechanisms behind drought resistance and the efficient use of water by the plants is fundamental for the achievement of those goals. In this paper, the major constraints to carbon assimilation and the metabolic regulations that play a role in plant responses to water deficits, acting in isolation or in conjunction with other stresses, is reviewed. The effects on carbon assimilation include increased resistance to diffusion by stomata and the mesophyll, as well as biochemical and photochemical adjustments. Oxidative stress is critical for crops that experience drought episodes. The role of detoxifying systems in preventing irreversible damage to photosynthetic machinery and of redox molecules as local or systemic signals is revised. Plant capacity to avoid or repair membrane damage during dehydration and rehydration processes is pivotal for the maintenance of membrane integrity, especially for those that embed functional proteins. Among such proteins are water transporters, whose role in the regulation of plant water status and transport of other metabolites is the subject of intense investigation. Long-distance chemical signalling, as an early response to drought, started to be unravelled more than a decade ago. The effects of those signals on carbon assimilation and partitioning of assimilates between reproductive and non-reproductive structures are revised and discussed in the context of novel management techniques. These applications are designed to combine increased crop water-use efficiency with sustained yield and improved quality of the products. Through an understanding of the mechanisms leading to successful adaptation to dehydration and rehydration, it has already been possible to identify key genes able to alter metabolism and increase plant tolerance to drought. An overview of the most important data on this topic, including engineering for osmotic adjustment or protection, water transporters, and C4 traits is presented in this paper. Emphasis is given to the most successful or promising cases of genetic engineering in crops, using functional or regulatory genes. as well as to promising technologies, such as the transfer of transcription factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
Self-citationLiu, Q., Kasuga, M., Sakuma, Y., Abe, H., Miura, S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (1998) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.10.8.1391 · Cited by 3,044
Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses
Garg, A. K., Kim, J.-K., Owens, T. G., Ranwala, A. P., Choi, Y. D., Kochian, L. V., & Wu, R. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252637799 · Cited by 1,346
Bota, J., Medrano, H., & Flexas, J. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01056.x · Cited by 546
Sivamani, E., Bahieldin, A., Wraith, J. M., Al-Niemi, T., Dyer, W. E., Ho, T.-H. D., & Qu, R. (2000) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-9452(99)00247-2 · Cited by 500
Mannitol Protects against Oxidation by Hydroxyl Radicals
Shen, B., Jensen, R. G., & Bohnert, H. J. (1997) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.115.2.527 · Cited by 422
TUBEROSA, R. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf134 · Cited by 397
Cited by
Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell.
Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125 · Cited by 4,181
Self-citationAbiotic and biotic stress combinations
Suzuki, N., Rivero, R. M., Shulaev, V., Blumwald, E., & Mittler, R. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12797 · Cited by 2,153
Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data?
Pinheiro, C., & Chaves, M. M. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq340 · Cited by 1,083
Self-citationLawlor, D. W., & Tezara, W. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn244 · Cited by 852
Engineering drought tolerance in plants: discovering and tailoring genes to unlock the future
Umezawa, T., Fujita, M., Fujita, Y., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2006) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.002 · Cited by 802
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaves, M. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-09-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 407
- Pages
- 2365-2384
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2139210662
- Cited by
- 1,359
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 22.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erh269
- The paper
- Chaves, M. M. (2004). Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.