The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolite fingerprinting and profiling in plants using NMR
Open accessAbstract
Although less sensitive than mass spectrometry (MS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy provides a powerful complementary technique for the identification and quantitative analysis of plant metabolites either in vivo or in tissue extracts. In one approach, metabolite fingerprinting, multivariate analysis of unassigned 1H NMR spectra is used to compare the overall metabolic composition of wild-type, mutant, and transgenic plant material, and to assess the impact of stress conditions on the plant metabolome. Metabolite fingerprinting by NMR is a fast, convenient, and effective tool for discriminating between groups of related samples and it identifies the most important regions of the spectrum for further analysis. In a second approach, metabolite profiling, the 1H NMR spectra of tissue extracts are assigned, a process that typically identifies 20-40 metabolites in an unfractionated extract. These profiles may also be used to compare groups of samples, and significant differences in metabolite concentrations provide the basis for hypotheses on the underlying causes for the observed segregation of the groups. Both approaches generate a metabolic phenotype for a plant, based on a system-wide but incomplete analysis of the plant metabolome. However, a review of the literature suggests that the emphasis so far has been on the accumulation of analytical data and sample classification, and that the potential of 1H NMR spectroscopy as a tool for probing the operation of metabolic networks, or as a functional genomics tool for identifying gene function, is largely untapped.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metabolomics — the link between genotypes and phenotypes
Fiehn, O. (2002) · Functional Genomics · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0448-0_11 · Cited by 3,167
Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics
Fiehn, O., Kopka, J., Dörmann, P., Altmann, T., Trethewey, R. N., & Willmitzer, L. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/81137 · Cited by 2,127
Metabolomics--the link between genotypes and phenotypes.
Fiehn, O. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 1,517
Simultaneous analysis of metabolites in potato tuber by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
Roessner, U., Wagner, C., Kopka, J., Trethewey, R. N., & Willmitzer, L. (2000) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00774.x · Cited by 1,154
Understanding 'Global' Systems Biology: Metabonomics and the Continuum of Metabolism
Nicholson, J. K., & Wilson, I. D. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1157 · Cited by 1,116
Plant metabolomics: large-scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era
Sumner, L. W., Mendes, P., & Dixon, R. A. (2003) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00708-2 · Cited by 1,093
Roessner, U., Luedemann, A., Brust, D., Fiehn, O., Linke, T., Willmitzer, L., & Fernie, A. R. (2001) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.13.1.11 · Cited by 1,017
A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations
Raamsdonk, L. M., Teusink, B., Broadhurst, D., Zhang, N., Hayes, A., Walsh, M. C., Berden, J. A., Brindle, K. M., Kell, D. B., Rowland, J. J., et al. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/83496 · Cited by 1,005
Metabolite profiling by one- and two-dimensional NMR analysis of complex mixtures
Fan, T. W.-M. (1996) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/0079-6565(95)01017-3 · Cited by 753
Metabolomics in Systems Biology
Weckwerth, W. (2003) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.135014 · Cited by 689
Cited by
Metabolomics for Functional Genomics, Systems Biology, and Biotechnology
Saito, K., & Matsuda, F. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092035 · Cited by 744
Salam, U., Ullah, S., Tang, Z.-H., Elateeq, A. A., Khan, Y., Khan, J., Khan, A., & Ali, S. (2023) · Life · doi:10.3390/life13030706 · Cited by 480
Recent analytical approaches in quality control of traditional Chinese medicines—A review
Jiang, Y., David, B., Tu, P., & Barbin, Y. (2010) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.024 · Cited by 469
Unraveling abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms – getting genomics going
Bohnert, H. J., Gong, Q., Li, P., & Ma, S. (2006) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.003 · Cited by 434
Weseler, A. R., & Bast, A. (2017) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/s12937-016-0218-1 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishnan, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12-23
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 410
- Pages
- 255-265
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2149603583
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolite fingerprinting and profiling in plants using NMR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/eri010
- The paper
- Krishnan, P. (2004). Metabolite fingerprinting and profiling in plants using NMR. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.