The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uptake system of silicon in different plant species
Open accessAbstract
The accumulation of silicon (Si) in the shoots varies considerably among plant species, but the mechanism responsible for this variation is poorly understood. The uptake system of Si was investigated in terms of the radial transport from the external solution to the root cortical cells and the release of Si from the cortical cells to the xylem in rice, cucumber, and tomato, which differ greatly in shoot Si concentration. Symplasmic solutions of the root tips were extracted by centrifugation. The concentrations of Si in the root-cell symplast in all species were higher than that in the external solution, although the concentration in rice was 3- and 5-fold higher than that in cucumber and tomato, respectively. A kinetic study showed that the radial transport of Si was mediated by a transporter with a K(m) value of 0.15 mM in all species, but with different V(max) values in the order of rice>cucumber>tomato. In the presence of the metabolic inhibitor 2,4-dinitrophenol, and at low temperature, the Si concentration in the root-cell symplast decreased to a level similar to that of the apoplasmic solution. These results suggest that both transporter-mediated transport and passive diffusion of Si are involved in the radial transport of Si and that the transporter-mediated transport is an energy-dependent process. The Si concentration of xylem sap in rice was 20- and 100-fold higher than that in cucumber and tomato, respectively. In contrast to rice, the Si concentration in the xylem sap was lower than that in the external solution in cucumber and tomato. A kinetic study showed that xylem loading of Si was also mediated by a kind of transporter in rice, but by passive diffusion in cucumber and tomato. These results indicate that a higher density of transporter for radial transport and the presence of a transporter for xylem loading are responsible for the high Si accumulation in rice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants
Ma, J. F., & Yamaji, N. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.007 · Cited by 1,917
Tubana, B. S., Babu, T., & Datnoff, L. E. (2016) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/ss.0000000000000179 · Cited by 392
A contemporary overview of silicon availability in agricultural soils
Haynes, R. J. (2014) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.201400202 · Cited by 353
Use of sugarcane industrial by-products for improving sugarcane productivity and soil health
Dotaniya, M. L., Datta, S. C., Biswas, D. R., Dotaniya, C. K., Meena, B. L., Rajendiran, S., Regar, K. L., & Lata, M. (2016) · International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s40093-016-0132-8 · Cited by 331
Alsaeedi, A., El-Ramady, H., Alshaal, T., El-Garawany, M., Elhawat, N., & Al-Otaibi, A. (2019) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.03.008 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitani, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02-21
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 414
- Pages
- 1255-1261
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2108378958
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uptake system of silicon in different plant species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/eri121
- The paper
- Mitani, N. (2005). Uptake system of silicon in different plant species. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.