The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constitutive water-conserving mechanisms are correlated with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]
Open accessAbstract
Pearl millet, a key staple crop of the semi-arid tropics, is mostly grown in water-limited conditions, and improving its performance depends on how genotypes manage limited water resources. This study investigates whether the control of water loss under non-limiting water conditions is involved in the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet. Two pairs of tolerant x sensitive pearl millet genotypes, PRLT 2/89-33-H77/833-2 and 863B-P2-ICMB 841-P3, and near-isogenic lines (NILs), introgressed with a terminal drought tolerance quantitative trait locus (QTL) from the donor parent PRLT 2/89-33 into H77/833-2 (NILs-QTL), were tested. Upon exposure to water deficit, transpiration began to decline at lower fractions of transpirable soil water (FTSW) in tolerant than in sensitive genotypes, and NILs-QTL followed the pattern of the tolerant parents. The transpiration rate (Tr, in g water loss cm(-2) d(-1)) under well-watered conditions was lower in tolerant than in sensitive parental genotypes, and the Tr of NILs-QTL followed the pattern of the tolerant parents. In addition, Tr measured in detached leaves (g water loss cm(-2) h(-1)) from field-grown plants of the parental lines showed lower Tr values in tolerant parents. Defoliation led to an increase in Tr that was higher in sensitive than in tolerant genotypes. The differences in Tr between genotypes was not related to the stomatal density. These results demonstrate that constitutive traits controlling leaf water loss under well-watered conditions correlate with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet. Such traits may lead to more water being available for grain filling under terminal drought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cobb, J. N., DeClerck, G., Greenberg, A., Clark, R., & McCouch, S. (2013) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-013-2066-0 · Cited by 666
Management of crop water under drought: a review
Bodner, G., Nakhforoosh, A., & Kaul, H.-P. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0283-4 · Cited by 629
Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era
Tuberosa, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00347 · Cited by 558
Root hydraulics: The forgotten side of roots in drought adaptation
Vadez, V. (2014) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2014.03.017 · Cited by 306
Self-citationSatyavathi, C. T., Ambawat, S., Khandelwal, V., & Srivastava, R. K. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.659938 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Kholová, J., Hash, C. T., Kakkera, A., Kočová, M., & Vadez, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-10-27
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 369-377
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2128825449
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constitutive water-conserving mechanisms are correlated with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erp314
- The paper
- Kholová, J., Hash, C. T., Kakkera, A., Kočová, M., & Vadez, V. (2010). Constitutive water-conserving mechanisms are correlated with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.