The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomass recalcitrance: a multi-scale, multi-factor, and conversion-specific property: Fig. 1.
Open accessAbstract
Recalcitrance of plant biomass to enzymatic hydrolysis for biofuel production is thought to be a property conferred by lignin or lignin-carbohydrate complexes. However, chemical catalytic and thermochemical conversion pathways, either alone or in combination with biochemical and fermentative pathways, now provide avenues to utilize lignin and to expand the product range beyond ethanol or butanol. To capture all of the carbon in renewable biomass, both lignin-derived aromatics and polysaccharide-derived sugars need to be transformed by catalysts to liquid hydrocarbons and high-value co-products. We offer a new definition of recalcitrance as those features of biomass which disproportionately increase energy requirements in conversion processes, increase the cost and complexity of operations in the biorefinery, and/or reduce the recovery of biomass carbon into desired products. The application of novel processing technologies applied to biomass reveal new determinants of recalcitrance that comprise a broad range of molecular, nanoscale, and macroscale factors. Sampling natural genetic diversity within a species, transgenic approaches, and synthetic biology approaches are all strategies that can be used to select biomass for reduced recalcitrance in various pretreatments and conversion pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review
Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., & Steele, P. H. (2006) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef0502397 · Cited by 5,663
STRUCTURE AND BIOGENESIS OF THE CELL WALLS OF GRASSES
Carpita, N. C. (1996) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.445 · Cited by 881
Self-citation
Cited by
Carbohydrate-aromatic interface and molecular architecture of lignocellulose
Kirui, A., Zhao, W., Deligey, F., Yang, H., Kang, X., Mentink-Vigier, F., & Wang, T. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28165-3 · Cited by 290
The current and emerging sources of technical lignins and their applications
Li, T., & Takkellapati, S. (2018) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1913 · Cited by 264
Zhang, R., Hu, Z., Peng, H., Liu, P., Wang, Y., Li, J., Lu, J., Wang, Y., Xia, T., & Peng, L. (2023) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d2gc03744k · Cited by 77
Hennen, S. G., Bomble, Y. J., Urbanowicz, B. R., & Bharadwaj, V. S. (2025) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d4dd00338a · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- McCann, M. C., & Carpita, N. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-06-09
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 4109-4118
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2269961040
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass recalcitrance: a multi-scale, multi-factor, and conversion-specific property: Fig. 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erv267
- The paper
- McCann, M. C., & Carpita, N. C. (2015). Biomass recalcitrance: a multi-scale, multi-factor, and conversion-specific property: Fig. 1. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.