Cited by 110biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPlant Surface Properties and TreatmentsNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

Cutin from agro-waste as a raw material for the production of bioplastics

Open access
Heredia-Guerrero, José A, Heredia, Antonio, Domínguez, Eva, Cingolani, Roberto, Bayer, Ilker S, Athanassiou, Athanassia, Benítez, José J·2017·Journal of Experimental Botany

Abstract

Cutin is the main component of plant cuticles constituting the framework that supports the rest of the cuticle components. This biopolymer is composed of esterified bi- and trifunctional fatty acids. Despite its ubiquity in terrestrial plants, it has been underutilized as raw material due to its insolubility and lack of melting point. However, in recent years, a few technologies have been developed to obtain cutin monomers from several agro-wastes at an industrial scale. This review is focused on the description of cutin properties, biodegradability, chemical composition, processability, abundance, and the state of art of the fabrication of cutin-based materials in order to evaluate whether this biopolymer can be considered a source for the production of renewable materials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jxb/erx272

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximately 250 million tons of inedible plant waste from different crop processing methods were generated as agricultural waste.

    “According to a report by the FAO [59], approximately 250 million tons of inedible plant waste from different crop processing methods were generated as agricultural waste [60]”

    From Valorization of Food Waste to Produce Value-Added Products Based on Its Bioactive Compounds (2023) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Introduction states that non-edible plant waste from crops amounts to approximately 250 million tons per year, calculated from FAO data. It does not say that this entire amount was generated by crop-processing methods; the later discussion of tomato-processing waste does not establish that qualifier for the estimate. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The plentiful chemical composition of agricultural waste allows it to be a versatile candidate with the potential to synthesize a variety of products, such as bioplastics.

    “Additionally, the plentiful chemical composition of agri-cultural waste allows it to be a versatile candidate with the potential to synthesize a variety of products, such as bioplastics from plant parts, including leaves, stems, and the outer cuticle of flowers [60].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [16]16. Cifarelli A, Cigognini I, Bolzoni L, Montanari A. 2016. Cutin isolated from tomato processing by-products: extraction methods and characterization. Proceedings of CYPRUS2016 4th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management, 1-20.
  2. [51]51. Kolattukudy PE. 2001. Polyesters in higher plants. In: Babel W, Steinbüchel A, eds. Biopolyesters. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1-49.
  3. [72]72. Phu PQ, Tri TM, Hien LPT, Ha LTT. 2017. Effect of different parameters on extrication performance and tensile properties of cutin membrane from Basella alba cuticle. Proceedings of The 2017 International Symposium on Materials Science and Technology, 31-39.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heredia-Guerrero, J. A., Heredia, A., Domínguez, E., Cingolani, R., Bayer, I. S., Athanassiou, A., & Benítez, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
2017-08-08
Volume
68
Issue
19
Pages
5401-5410
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W2743808310
Cited by
110
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Botany (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Keywords
cutin, plant cuticle, agricultural waste valorization, bioplastics, cutin monomers, fatty acid esters, biodegradability, renewable materials
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Food-Processing Industry, Membrane Lipids, Plastics, Refuse Disposal, Solid Waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review