SUICIDE ASSISTANCE FOR MENTALLY DISORDERED INDIVIDUALS IN SWITZERLAND AND THE STATE'S POSITIVE OBLIGATION TO FACILITATE DIGNIFIED SUICIDE: Haas c. Suisse, Cour europeenne des droits de l'homme, 1re section (20 janvier 2011) (Unreported)
Open accessAbstract
In principle, any individual in Switzerland may assist the suicide of another, provided that the assistance is not selfishly motivated.2 Moreover, the lawfulness of suicide assistance is not contingent on any particular status of the individual who dies (for example, whether he is terminally ill), although he must have capacity in order for the final act to be considered suicide.3 However, no great variation among assistors and the assisted is observable in Switzerland: in almost all cases, assisted suicide takes place with the involvement of a physician and a ‘right to die’ organisation,4 and the individual who dies suffers from a recognised medical condition.5 However, additional regulation applies to physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Federal narcotics law permits physicians only to administer, dispense, or prescribe fast-acting barbiturates (the preferred lethal medication for assisted suicide) within the limits of accepted professional and scientific practice.6 This requirement is reiterated in Cantonal health law.7 In 1999, the Zurich Administrative Court held that PAS would only accord with accepted practice for conditions ‘indisputably leading to death’.8 Similarly, guidance issued in 2004 by the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMS) sets as one precondition for PAS that ‘[t]he patient's disease justifies the assumption that he is approaching the end of life’.9
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kim, S. Y. H., De Vries, R. G., & Peteet, J. R. (2016) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2887 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Nicolini, M. E., Kim, S. Y. H., Churchill, M. E., & Gastmans, C. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720001543 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“…Netherlands (Berghmans et al., 2009; EuthanasiaCode 2018) and by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court following the 2006 Haas case ruling in Switzerland (Black, 2012). eAlthough the Swiss law does not have an unbearable suffering or irremediability requirement, the guidelines by the Swiss Academy of…”
BackgroundInfluentialFirst do no harm: pressing concerns regarding euthanasia in Belgium
Cohen‐Almagor, R. (2013) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.06.014 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Kammeraat, M., van Rooijen, G., Kuijper, L., Kiverstein, J. D., & Denys, D. A. J. P. (2023) · BMJ Mental Health · doi:10.1136/bmjment-2023-300729 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Lives Not Worth Living in Modern Euthanasia Regimes
Kim, S. Y. H. (2019) · Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jppi.12300 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“(Black, 2012)) Consider one of the most liberal EAS regimes in the world.”
BackgroundVergallo, G. M., & Gulino, M. (2022) · Ethics Medicine and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jemep.2022.100752 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Novel Beings and Assisted Nonexistence
Black, I. (2021) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180120001085 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationEuthanasia and Assisted Suicide in Psychiatry: An Overview of the Field
Nicolini, M. (2025) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2274-0_31 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Black, I.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Black, I.
- ORCID
- Black, I.
- Venue
- Medical Law Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-01-13
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-166
- ISSN
- 0967-0742 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3790
- OpenAlex
- W2073823489
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- kclpure.kcl.ac.uk
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Medical Law Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
- Keywords
- assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide, mental illness, right to die, positive obligations, human dignity, European Court of Human Rights, Swiss law, euthanasia, end-of-life care, right to life
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Human Rights, Right to Die, Switzerland, Suicide, Assisted, Persons with Mental Disabilities, Persons with Intellectual Disabilities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review