Cited by 320Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide of Patients With Psychiatric Disorders in the Netherlands 2011 to 2014

Open access
Kim, Scott Y. H., De Vries, Raymond G., Peteet, John R.·2016·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) of psychiatric patients is increasing in some jurisdictions such as Belgium and the Netherlands. However, little is known about the practice, and it remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of patients receiving EAS for psychiatric conditions and how the practice is regulated in the Netherlands. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This investigation reviewed psychiatric EAS case summaries made available online by the Dutch regional euthanasia review committees as of June 1, 2015. Two senior psychiatrists used directed content analysis to review and code the reports. In total, 66 cases from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical and social characteristics of patients, physician review process of the patients' requests, and the euthanasia review committees' assessments of the physicians' actions. RESULTS: Of the 66 cases reviewed, 70% (n = 46) were women. In total, 32% (n = 21) were 70 years or older, 44% (n = 29) were 50 to 70 years old, and 24% (n = 16) were 30 to 50 years old. Most had chronic, severe conditions, with histories of attempted suicides and psychiatric hospitalizations. Most had personality disorders and were described as socially isolated or lonely. Depressive disorders were the primary psychiatric issue in 55% (n = 36) of cases. Other conditions represented were psychotic, posttraumatic stress or anxiety, somatoform, neurocognitive, and eating disorders, as well as prolonged grief and autism. Comorbidities with functional impairments were common. Forty-one percent (n = 27) of physicians performing EAS were psychiatrists. Twenty-seven percent (n = 18) of patients received the procedure from physicians new to them, 14 of whom were physicians from the End-of-Life Clinic, a mobile euthanasia clinic. Consultation with other physicians was extensive, but 11% (n = 7) of cases had no independent psychiatric input, and 24% (n = 16) of cases involved disagreement among consultants. The euthanasia review committees found that one case failed to meet legal due care criteria. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Persons receiving EAS for psychiatric disorders in the Netherlands are mostly women and of diverse ages, with complex and chronic psychiatric, medical, and psychosocial histories. The granting of their EAS requests appears to involve considerable physician judgment, usually involving multiple physicians who do not always agree (sometimes without independent psychiatric input), but the euthanasia review committees generally defer to the judgments of the physicians performing the EAS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2887

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 25 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    In 16 cases with physician disagreements, the RTE specifically addressed the disagreement in their Assessment in 2 cases.

    “In 16 cases with physician disagreements, the RTE specifically addressed the disagreement in their Assessment in 2 cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In half the cases, more than one official EAS consultant was involved.

    “In half the cases, more than one official EAS consultant was involved”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    The women/men ratio in the study contrasts with the 43% women/57% men ratio in overall Dutch EAS recipients.

    “It also contrasts with 43% women/57% men ratio in overall Dutch EAS recipients.22”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingown data

    A majority of patients (52%) had made suicide attempts.

    “The majority (52%) had made suicide attempts”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There were disagreements among the physicians in 16 cases (24%).

    “There were disagreements among the physicians in 16 cases (24%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 19
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    There was one additional case involving the End-of-Life Clinic, for a total of 15 such cases.

    “(There was one additional case involving the End-of-Life Clinic, for a total of 15 End-of-Life Clinic cases.)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    12 patients (18%) had at least three co-morbidities.

    “12 patients (18%) had at least 3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One disagreement concerned the unbearable suffering criterion; the remaining disagreements concerned competence (8 of 16) and futility (13 of 16).

    “There was one disagreement about the unbearable suffering criterion. The remaining disagreements were about competence (8 of 16) and futility (13 of 16; once case could have more than one).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 3 cases, physicians changed their minds; in the remaining 18, the physician performing the EAS was new to the patient.

    “In 3 cases, their physicians changed their minds; in the remaining 18, the physician performing the EAS was new to the patient.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In 6 patients (9.1%), the psychiatric history was approximately 6-10 years.

    “in 6 patients (9·1%) approximately 6–10 years”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Reasons for treatment refusal included no motivation in 18 cases, concern about side effects or risk of harm in 12 cases, and doubts about efficacy in 10 cases.

    “due to no motivation in 18 cases, concern about side effects or risk of harm in 12 cases, and doubts about efficacy in 10 cases”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The time from first meeting with the Clinic's physician to death ranged from 3 weeks in one case, less than 3 months in 7 cases, and 5-12 months in 7 cases.

    “The time from first meeting with the Clinic’s physician to death ranged from 3 weeks in one case (“due care not met” case), less than 3 months in 7 cases, and 5–12 months in 7 cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    End-of-Life Clinic cases increased: 1 of 12 cases in 2012, 6 of 32 in 2013, and 8 of 16 in 2014.

    “The End-of-Life Clinic cases increased: 1 of 12 cases in 2012, 6 of 32 in 2013, and 8 of 16 in 2014.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    24% of patients were between 30 and 50 years old.

    “24% were 30–50”
    • Also stated in: § Characteristics of Patients · plain
      “24% were 30–50 years old”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The mean number of words per report declined yearly from 2011 to 2014: 1573, 1248, 1154, 1117.

    “The mean number of words (in Dutch, excluding abstracts) per report declined yearly from 2011 to 2014: 1573, 1248, 1154, 1117.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The RTE exercised case-specific flexibility; a lag of 3 months without a consultant revisit in one case was deemed acceptable due to case-specific reasons.

    “The RTE exercised case-specific flexibility. For example, although the RTE’s stated view is that the intervening time from EAS consultation to death should be less than a “few weeks,”7 a lag of 3 months without a revisit by a consultant in one case (due to a vacation) was, due to case-specific reasons, deemed acceptable.(2013-09)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Four women had a chronic eating disorder together with borderline personality disorder.

    “Four women had a chronic eating disorder with borderline personality disorder.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 5 of the 7 cases without independent psychiatric expert involvement, the EAS physician was not a psychiatrist; in 4 of those 5, psychiatric input came from clinicians already involved in the patient's care.

    “in 5 of these cases, the EAS physician was not a psychiatrist; in 4 of these 5 cases, psychiatric input came from clinicians already involved in the patient’s care.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The women/men ratio in the study is 2.3, which is the reverse of the women/men suicide ratio in the Netherlands and almost identical to the ratio of women/men suicide attempts.

    “one striking finding is that the women/men ratio is 2.3 which is the reverse of the women/men suicide ratio in the Netherlands20 and almost identical to the ratio of women/men suicide attempts.21”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [21]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The cases studied were only somewhat younger than Dutch EAS recipients overall, and 60% were over age 60.

    “Thus, the cases we studied were only somewhat younger than the Dutch EAS recipients overall and 60% are still over the age of 60.22”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Only one of 110 psychiatric EAS cases did not meet due care criteria; in 2014, 4 of 5306 (0.1%) EAS cases were judged not to meet due care.

    “Only one of 110 psychiatric EAS cases did not meet due care criteria; in 2014, 4 of 5306 (0.1%) EAS cases were judged not to meet due care.18”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In 7 cases, the EAS performing physicians sought 3 official EAS consultations; in a third of cases (22 of 66), 3 or more physicians were involved in the evaluation.

    “In 7 cases, the EAS performing physicians apparently felt the need to seek 3 official EAS consultations (the law requires one) and in a third of cases (22 of 66) there were 3 or more physicians (in various roles, not counting the EAS physician) involved in the evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The results rely on coding judgments and approximations of quantities that are described imprecisely.

    “the results still rely on coding judgments and approximations of quantities that are described imprecisely.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The variability of physician judgments may be reflected in almost a third of patients having been refused EAS and a quarter of cases engendering disagreements among involved physicians.

    “The variability of physician judgments may be reflected in almost a third of the patients having been refused EAS and a quarter of the cases engendering disagreements among involved physicians.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The coding scheme was developed iteratively by a bioethicist-psychiatrist and a consultation psychiatrist as they independently read the reports; discrepancies were resolved by discussion.

    “The coding scheme was developed iteratively by a bioethicist-psychiatrist (SK) and a consultation psychiatrist (JP) as they independently read the reports, repeatedly comparing variables of interest in light of the main research questions of the project. SK read and coded all of the reports and JP confirmed the coding by reading through the reports again; discrepancies were resolved by discussion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The primary limitation is that because the RTE reports are written in plain language, there is a limit to what can be inferred clinically.

    “The primary limitation of our study is that because the RTE reports are intentionally written in “plain language,”28 there is a limit to what can be inferred clinically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Translations were obtained through the National Institutes of Health Library's Translation Services, which uses companies to provide certified medical translations.

    “Translations were obtained through the National Institutes of Health Library’s Translation Services which uses companies to provide certified medical translations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The practice of EAS for psychiatric disorders involves complicated, suffering patients whose requests for EAS often require considerable physician judgment.

    “We conclude that the practice of EAS for psychiatric disorders involves complicated, suffering patients whose requests for EAS often require considerable physician judgment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Analysis consisted of frequencies and ad hoc cross-tabulations, without hypothesis testing given the descriptive goals of the study.

    “Analysis consisted of frequencies and ad hoc cross-tabulations, without hypothesis testing given the descriptive goals of the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    An important strength is that the study examined reports of actual psychiatric EAS cases across an entire jurisdiction, rather than asking physicians to recollect their experiences or opinions.

    “an important strength of our study is that we examined reports of actual psychiatric EAS cases across an entire jurisdiction, rather than asking physicians to recollect their experiences or opinions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    When consultants disagreed, the RTE gives deference to the opinion of the treating psychiatrists.

    “When consultants disagreed, the RTE gives deference to the opinion of the treating psychiatrists.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    For psychiatric cases, one might expect more variability in judgments, given the potential impact of some neuropsychiatric conditions on decision-making capacity and the more complicated determinations of medical futility.

    “For psychiatric cases, one might expect more variability in judgments, given the potential impact of some neuropsychiatric conditions on decision-making capacity15,23,24 and the more complicated determinations of medical futility that must incorporate patients’ treatment refusals in the context of less than certain prognosis even among persons with treatment resistant depression.25,26”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Little is known about the practice of psychiatric EAS.

    “However, little is known about the practice and it remains very controversial.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Two senior psychiatrists used directed content analysis to review and code the reports.

    “Two senior psychiatrists used directed content analysis to review and code the reports.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Psychiatric disorders contribute to suicides, can sometimes impair decision-making, and are stigmatized.

    “Psychiatric disorders contribute to suicides (a major public health problem14), can sometimes impair decision-making,15 and are stigmatized.16”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Dutch physicians may be self-regulating to limit EAS to complex cases, or psychiatric patients with those features may disproportionately seek EAS.

    “Dutch physicians, in spite of their open attitude toward EAS, may be self-regulating to limit EAS to such complex cases; or, it may be that psychiatric patients with those features may disproportionately seek EAS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Requests for EAS to relieve suffering from psychiatric conditions require special scrutiny.

    “Further, requests for EAS to relieve suffering from psychiatric conditions require special scrutiny.7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The retrospective oversight system in the Netherlands generally defers to the judgments of physicians who perform and report EAS.

    “The retrospective oversight system in the Netherlands generally defers to the judgments of physicians who perform and report EAS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The published RTE case summaries accurately and completely describe the psychiatric EAS cases.

    “We reviewed all online reports identified by the Regional Euthanasia Review Committees (RTE) as psychiatric cases, available as of 1 June 2015.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 66 published cases are representative of all psychiatric EAS cases in the Netherlands during 2011–14.

    “66 cases from 2011–14 were reviewed.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Earlier studies reported that 71%-79% of psychiatric patients who died through MAiD in the Netherlands had more than 1 psychiatric disorder.

    “This finding is in line with those of earlier studies reporting that 71%–79% of psychiatric patients who died through MAiD in the Netherlands had more than 1 psychiatric disorder. 4,17,19”

    From Establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of medical assistance in dying in the Netherlands: a qualitative study (2022) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results, under “Characteristics of Patients” (page unavailable), report that 37 of 66 patients had at least two conditions—about 56%, not 71%–79%. The paper supports the general point that multiple conditions were common, but its reported proportion contradicts the range attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In these Netherlands and Belgium samples, less than 20% suffer from schizophrenia and less than 10% each from anxiety disorders, trauma sequelae, addictive disorders, bipolar disorders or others.

    “Less than 20% suffer from schizophrenia and less than 10% each from anxiety disorders, trauma sequelae, addictive disorders, bipolar disorders or others.”

    From Assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders: a review of clinical-ethical arguments and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results (Characteristics of Patients; page unavailable) report PTSD-related and other anxiety disorders in 28 of 66 Dutch patients (42%), contrary to the claim that each of those categories affected less than 10%. The Discussion mentions a Belgian sample but does not give the claimed percentages for those diagnoses. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • About half of Belgian patients had made suicide attempts before, including while waiting for approval.

    “about half of patients had made suicide attempts before [62, 63], including while waiting for approval [61].”

    From Debating Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Death in People with Psychiatric Disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says a majority of the study’s patients had previously attempted suicide, supporting the portion cited to this paper. But these were Dutch patients, not Belgian patients. The separate claim about attempts while waiting for approval is attached to citation [61], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the Netherlands, MAiD-NT cases were for patients with mood or personality disorders, mainly women aged between 50 and 70 years.

    “for patients with mood or personality disorders, mainly women and aged between 50 and 70 years [62, 65].”

    From Debating Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Death in People with Psychiatric Disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results (Characteristics of Patients) identify depressive conditions as the primary issue in 55% of cases, and the Discussion describes prominent personality disorders and a women-to-men ratio of 2.3. The Discussion does not establish that most patients were aged 50–70; it instead notes that 60% were over 60. The age characterization is therefore not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Kim et al. (2016) and Van Veen et al. (2018) showed that depression or anxiety disorders are most common among patients suffering from a psychiatric disorder requesting EAS.

    “Kim et al. (2016) and Van Veen et al. (2018) showed that these disorders are most common among patients suffering from a PD requesting EAS.”

    From The Dutch practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: a qualitative case review study (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results (Characteristics of Patients; page unavailable) report that depressive conditions were the primary psychiatric issue in 36 of 66 cases (55%) and PTSD-related or other anxiety disorders were present in 28 (42%). This supports the prominence of those disorders, but the study examined patients who received EAS, not all patients requesting it; the Discussion explicitly distinguishes its recipients from requesters in another report. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • End-of-Life Clinic count conflates new physicians with all Clinic cases

    Minor

    The abstract says 15 of the 18 patients treated by a new physician were treated by End-of-Life Clinic physicians. The results say only 14 new physicians were affiliated with the Clinic; the fifteenth Clinic case was additional to those 14.

  • Percentage of cases without a psychiatrist consultant is miscalculated

    Minor

    Twenty-nine of 66 cases is about 44%, not 41%.

    Reported 41 · recomputed 43.939394

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S. Y. H., De Vries, R. G., & Peteet, J. R.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor3CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Scott Y. H.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2016-04-01
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
362
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2271580562
Cited by
320
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 14
FWCI
61.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • University of Rochester
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99CL999999)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
euthanasia, assisted suicide, mental illness, euthanasia legislation, depressive disorders, personality disorders, social isolation, loneliness, physician consultation, end-of-life care, Netherlands, case characteristics, physician disagreement, psychiatric hospitalization, suicide attempts, comorbidities, functional disability, prolonged grief disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Decision Making, Major Depressive Disorder, Euthanasia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Physicians, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Social Isolation, Somatoform Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Suicide, Attempted, Treatment Refusal, Mental Competency, Suicide, Assisted, Medical Futility, Government Regulation, Standard of Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review