Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Increasing Resilience and Reducing Attrition of Injured US Navy Recruits.
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: US Navy recruits who have injuries preventing them from participating in intense physical conditioning are pulled out of boot camp training and receive treatment that includes daily physical therapy, pain medications, and psychoeducational groups. Graduation from boot camp for these recruits requires not only recovering from their injuries but also passing a required Physical Fitness Assessment consisting of a timed 1.5-mile run, curl-ups, and push-ups. About 50-60% of these recruits will eventually be separated out and sent home. The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-based program called Mindfulness for Pain and Performance Enhancement (MPPE). This treatment program was designed to help recruits effectively handle pain and assist them in improving their physical performance in the service of recovery, boot camp completion, and entrance into the Navy.Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the Edward Hines VA Hospital/Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center Institutional Review Board and the Naval Services Training Command. Treatment was voluntary and a total of 373 recruits enrolled in one of the 32 cycles of MPPE administered. Attrition was 35.1% (131 recruits). The control group comprised 310 recruits who did not enroll in MPPE. Recruits continued to receive standard treatment services (e.g., physical therapy, medical interventions, and psychoeducational groups) while participating in MPPE. Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were used to analyze comparisons among treatment, control, and attrition groups on demographic, clinical, and boot camp training variables. Paired sample t-tests and Cohen's d effect sizes were computed to assess change on treatment outcome measures. Logistic regression was performed to identify demographic, clinical, and boot camp training variables predictive of graduation.Results: All of the pre- to post-treatment outcome measures were significant and Cohen's d effect sizes ranged from 0.41 to 0.84. Effect size changes were small for anxiety and experiential avoidance; moderate for pain acceptance, mindfulness, cognitive inflexibility, and depression; and large for pain reduction. Treatment completers graduated at a higher rate (58.3%) than attrites (34.4%) or controls (45.5%). Based on a logistic regression model, variables predictive of graduation included MPPE completion, age, and reported pain rating.Conclusion: MPPE is a six-session, 2-wk-long Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based approach to pain and physical performance that was added to existing treatment services. Results supported the use of this program for helping recruits recover from injuries and successfully pass physical training requirements for graduation. Recruits were not randomly assigned to treatment, thus limiting the interpretation of outcomes. Incorporating this treatment earlier in boot camp training and making it available to more recruits (i.e., not only injured recruits) may further reduce attrition and contribute to greater resiliency of sailors within the US Navy fleet.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
4 of 18 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Much of the attrition (65.6%) came from recruits who voluntarily stopped attending after the second session.
“much of this attrition (65.6%) came from recruits who voluntarily stopped attending after the second session.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Age made a unique statistically significant contribution to the logistic regression model (p<0.01; OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.13).
“age (p < 0.01; OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.13)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pre-to post-treatment effect size for pain acceptance was d=0.64 (95% CI 0.51-0.78).
“Pre-to post-effect sizes with 95% CI were as follows: pain (d = 0.84, CI = 0.66-0.95),pain acceptance (d = 0.64, CI = 0.51-0.78),mindfulness (d = 0.60, CI = 0.47-0.74),cognitive fusion (d = 0.63, CI = 0.48-0.76),experiential avoidance (d = 0.48, CI = 0.34-0.61),depression (d = 0.54, CI = 0.39-0.66),and anxiety (d = 0.41, CI = 0.27-0.54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MPPE completion compared with not participating at all made a unique statistically significant contribution to the logistic regression model (p<0.001; OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.28-2.98).
“or not participating at all (p < 0.001; OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.28-2.98)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Excluding separation classifications with low cell counts, there was no significant association between group (treatment, control, or attrite) and reason for separation (χ2(8, n=309)=10.16, p>0.05).
“Excluding separation classifications that had low cell counts, there was not a significant association between group (treatment, control, or attrite) and reason for separation, χ 2 (8, n = 309) = 10.16,p > 0.05.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Not being transferred from FIT made a unique statistically significant contribution to the logistic regression model (p<0.001; OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.58-3.98).
“not transferred from FIT (p < 0.001; OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.58-3.98)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pre-to post-treatment effect size for anxiety was d=0.41 (95% CI 0.27-0.54).
“Pre-to post-effect sizes with 95% CI were as follows: pain (d = 0.84, CI = 0.66-0.95),pain acceptance (d = 0.64, CI = 0.51-0.78),mindfulness (d = 0.60, CI = 0.47-0.74),cognitive fusion (d = 0.63, CI = 0.48-0.76),experiential avoidance (d = 0.48, CI = 0.34-0.61),depression (d = 0.54, CI = 0.39-0.66),and anxiety (d = 0.41, CI = 0.27-0.54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Treatment completion was a significant predictor of graduation in a logistic regression model.
“Treatment completion was also a significant predictor of graduation in a logistic regression model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Recruits moved to the RCU before the sixth week in training did better than those not moved until week 6 or later.
“Recruits moved to the RCU before the sixth week in training did better than those who were not moved until week 6 or later.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MPPE completion compared with dropping out made a unique statistically significant contribution to the logistic regression model (p<0.001; OR 2.63; 95% CI 1.55-4.44).
“MPPE completion compared with dropping out (p < 0.001; OR 2.63; 95% CI 1.55-4.44)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pre-to post-treatment effect size for cognitive fusion was d=0.63 (95% CI 0.48-0.76).
“Pre-to post-effect sizes with 95% CI were as follows: pain (d = 0.84, CI = 0.66-0.95),pain acceptance (d = 0.64, CI = 0.51-0.78),mindfulness (d = 0.60, CI = 0.47-0.74),cognitive fusion (d = 0.63, CI = 0.48-0.76),experiential avoidance (d = 0.48, CI = 0.34-0.61),depression (d = 0.54, CI = 0.39-0.66),and anxiety (d = 0.41, CI = 0.27-0.54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Recruits reporting average pain greater than 3 on a 10-point scale were significantly more likely to be separated.
“Recruits reporting average pain greater than 3 on a 10-point scale were significantly more likely to be separated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pre-to post-treatment effect size for pain was d=0.84 (95% CI 0.66-0.95).
“Pre-to post-effect sizes with 95% CI were as follows: pain (d = 0.84, CI = 0.66-0.95),pain acceptance (d = 0.64, CI = 0.51-0.78),mindfulness (d = 0.60, CI = 0.47-0.74),cognitive fusion (d = 0.63, CI = 0.48-0.76),experiential avoidance (d = 0.48, CI = 0.34-0.61),depression (d = 0.54, CI = 0.39-0.66),and anxiety (d = 0.41, CI = 0.27-0.54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect size for pain reduction was large.
“effect sizes of large for pain reduction”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Based on a logistic regression model, variables predictive of graduation included MPPE completion, age, and reported pain rating.
“Based on a logistic regression model, variables predictive of graduation included MPPE completion, age, and reported pain rating.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Effect size change was moderate for pain acceptance, mindfulness, cognitive inflexibility, and depression.
“Effect size changes were small for anxiety and experiential avoidance; moderate for pain acceptance, mindfulness, cognitive inflexibility, and depression; and large for pain reduction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Treatment completers, attrites, and controls were comparable on lowest and highest pain ratings.
“Treatment completers, attrites, and controls were comparable on these ranges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Effect size change was small for anxiety and experiential avoidance.
“Effect size changes were small for anxiety and experiential avoidance; moderate for pain acceptance, mindfulness, cognitive inflexibility, and depression; and large for pain reduction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Attrition among recruits enrolled in MPPE was 35.1% (131 recruits).
“Attrition was 35.1% (131 recruits).”
- Also stated in: § Sample Characteristics · plain
“Attrition was 35.1% (n = 131); they attended 2.4 sessions on average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Sample Characteristics · plain
- Findingown data
Average pain rating made a unique statistically significant contribution to the logistic regression model (p<0.001; OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.45-0.60).
“and average pain rating (p < 0.001; OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.45-0.60).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pre-to post-treatment effect size for depression was d=0.54 (95% CI 0.39-0.66).
“Pre-to post-effect sizes with 95% CI were as follows: pain (d = 0.84, CI = 0.66-0.95),pain acceptance (d = 0.64, CI = 0.51-0.78),mindfulness (d = 0.60, CI = 0.47-0.74),cognitive fusion (d = 0.63, CI = 0.48-0.76),experiential avoidance (d = 0.48, CI = 0.34-0.61),depression (d = 0.54, CI = 0.39-0.66),and anxiety (d = 0.41, CI = 0.27-0.54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Recruits who later graduated and those who were later separated had equivalent improvement on experiential avoidance.
“Compared with recruits who were later separated, recruits who later graduated reported greater improvement on pain, mindfulness, depression, and anxiety; less improvement on pain acceptance and cognitive fusion; and equivalent improvement on experiential avoidance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Effect size change was large for pain reduction.
“Effect size changes were small for anxiety and experiential avoidance; moderate for pain acceptance, mindfulness, cognitive inflexibility, and depression; and large for pain reduction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There was not much differentiation on pre-to post-outcome measures between treatment completers who graduated and those who were separated.
“Yet, there was not much differentiation on pre-to post-outcome measures between treatment completers who graduated and those who were separated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Recruits transferred from FIT were especially at risk for separation (70.2%).
“Recruits who were transferred from FIT were especially at risk for separation (70.2%).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Among recruits coming to the RCU from FIT, 70% were later separated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Findingown data
Pre-to post-treatment effect size for mindfulness was d=0.60 (95% CI 0.47-0.74).
“Pre-to post-effect sizes with 95% CI were as follows: pain (d = 0.84, CI = 0.66-0.95),pain acceptance (d = 0.64, CI = 0.51-0.78),mindfulness (d = 0.60, CI = 0.47-0.74),cognitive fusion (d = 0.63, CI = 0.48-0.76),experiential avoidance (d = 0.48, CI = 0.34-0.61),depression (d = 0.54, CI = 0.39-0.66),and anxiety (d = 0.41, CI = 0.27-0.54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gender was not a significant predictor in the logistic regression model.
“Gender was not a significant predictor in the logistic regression model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant difference in booster session attendance between graduated recruits (M=5.3) and separated recruits (M=4.5), t(231)=1.19, p>0.05.
“There was no significant difference in booster session attendance between graduated recruits (M = 5.3) and separated recruits (M = 4.5), t (231) = 1.19, p > 0.05.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Injury/condition classifications requiring transfer to the RCU were not significantly predictive in the logistic regression model.
“Injury/condition classifications requiring transfer to the RCU were not significantly predictive in the logistic regression model; average pain rating was.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The attrition rate was 35.1%.
“Third, the attrition rate was a fairly high 35.1%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pre-to post-treatment effect size for experiential avoidance was d=0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.61).
“Pre-to post-effect sizes with 95% CI were as follows: pain (d = 0.84, CI = 0.66-0.95),pain acceptance (d = 0.64, CI = 0.51-0.78),mindfulness (d = 0.60, CI = 0.47-0.74),cognitive fusion (d = 0.63, CI = 0.48-0.76),experiential avoidance (d = 0.48, CI = 0.34-0.61),depression (d = 0.54, CI = 0.39-0.66),and anxiety (d = 0.41, CI = 0.27-0.54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared with recruits who were later separated, recruits who later graduated reported less improvement on pain acceptance and cognitive fusion.
“Compared with recruits who were later separated, recruits who later graduated reported greater improvement on pain, mindfulness, depression, and anxiety; less improvement on pain acceptance and cognitive fusion; and equivalent improvement on experiential avoidance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Treatment completers graduated at a higher rate (58.3%) than attrites (34.4%) or controls (45.5%).
“Treatment completers graduated at a higher rate (58.3%) than attrites (34.4%) or controls (45.5%).”
- Also stated in: § Variables Predictive of Graduation · plain
“Treatment was significant, with completers graduating at a higher rate (58.3%) than attrites (34.4%) or controls (45.5%).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Treatment completers graduated at a higher rate (58.3%) than controls (45.5%) and attrites (34.4%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Variables Predictive of Graduation · plain
- Premisecitation
Laboratory studies on ACT and mindfulness using experimentally induced pain found increased acceptance from mindfulness-based approaches relative to control focused strategies.
“Laboratory studies on ACT [16][17][18] and mindfulness [19][20][21][22] using experimentally induced pain to reproduce conditions of acute pain found increased acceptance from mindfulness-based approaches relative to control focused strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16][17][18]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [19][20][21][22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Findings from this study provide support for MPPE, an ACT-based treatment program designed to help recruits more effectively handle pain and improve their performance on physical fitness tests required for entrance into the Navy.
“Findings from this study provide support for MPPE, an ACTbased treatment program designed to help recruits more effectively handle pain, and improve their performance on physical fitness tests required for entrance into the Navy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There are no published studies on mindfulness and acceptance-based treatment for people in the acute or subacute phases of pain following an injury.
- Premisecitation
Sappington and Longshore's systematic review supported use of mindfulness and acceptance-based approaches based on subjective measures of mindfulness, cognitive flexibility, experiential acceptance, and anxiety.
“Sappington and Longshore's 31 systematic review supported use of these approaches based on subjective measures of mindfulness, cognitive flexibility, experiential acceptance, and anxiety.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Sappington, 2015, Systematically reviewing the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions for enhanced athletic performance. J Clin, Sport Psychol source
- Study design and conductnone given
The study was not a randomized controlled trial.
“First, it was not a randomized control trial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
There was no follow-up with those recruits to ask them why they stopped coming.
“There was no follow-up with those recruits to ask them why they stopped coming.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
There were significant differences between treatment completers and attrites on two pre-treatment measures.
“There were significant differences between treatment completers and attrites on two pre-treatment measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Improvement on outcome measures may not have been attributable to MPPE but to factors not examined.
“Improvement on outcome measures may not have been attributable to MPPE but to factors not examined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
There were no other significant differences among groups on injury/condition classification.
“There were no other significant differences among groups on injury/condition classification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A significantly greater percentage of treatment completers (64.9%) had skeletal injuries compared with attrites (52.7%) and controls (52.9%).
“However, a significantly greater percentage of treatment completers (64.9%) had skeletal injuries compared with attrites (52.7%) and controls (52.9%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Results from this study provided support for the use of a mindfulness and acceptance-based treatment program designed to help recruits effectively respond to pain and enhance physical performance to recover, graduate from basic training, and become sailors.
“Results from this study provided support for the use of a mindfulness and acceptance-based treatment program designed to help recruits effectively respond to pain and enhance physical performance to recover, graduate from basic training, and become sailors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The current study represents the first time that a behavioral intervention was implemented to assist these recruits and reduce attrition.
- Study design and conductnone given
No outcome measures were administered to the control group.
“Second, no outcome measures were administered to the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Completers (M=6.74, SD=5.06) also scored lower than attrites on the PHQ-9 (M=7.98, SD=5.97), t(231.9)=2.07, p<0.05, d=0.23.
“Completers (M = 6.74,SD = 5.06) also scored lower than attrites on the PHQ-9 (M = 7.98, SD = 5.97), t (231.9)= 2.07, p < 0.05, d = 0.23 (degrees of freedom on the PHQ-9 were adjusted due to unequal variances).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
On the PRS, completers (M=15.98, SD=10.20) scored lower than attrites (M=18.51, SD=11.34), t(371)=2.20, p<0.05, d=0.23.
“On the PRS, completers (mean [M] = 15.98,standard deviation [SD] = 10.20)scored lower than attrites (M = 18.51,SD = 11.34),t (371) = 2.20, p < 0.05, d = 0.23.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
There was mixed evidence on objective measures of athletic performance such as running and archery.
“There was mixed evidence, however, on objective measures of athletic performance such as running 25,29 and archery.27,29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [25] De Petrillo, 2009, Mindfulness for long distance runners: an open trial using mindful sport performance enhancement (MPSE), J Clin Sport Psychol source
- cites [29] Thompson, 2011, One year follow-up of mindful sport performance enhancement (MPSE) for archers, golfers, and long-distance runners, J Clin Sport Psychol source
- cites [27] Kaufman, 2009, Evaluation of mindful sport performance enhancement (MPSE): a new approach to promote flow in athletes, J Clin Sport Psychol source
- Study design and conductreasoning
Comparisons with the control group could only be made on demographics, select clinical variables, and boot camp training variables.
“Comparisons with the control group could only be made on demographics, select clinical variables (e.g., injury/medical condition diagnoses, pain ratings, and psychoeducational group attendance), and boot camp training variables (e.g., time in RCU and transfer from FIT).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Naval recruits with injuries and medical conditions are at risk of getting separated from boot camp if they cannot recover from injuries or medical conditions and successfully pass a PFA required for graduation.
“Naval recruits with injuries and medical conditions are at risk of getting separated from boot camp if they cannot recover from injuries or medical conditions and successfully pass a PFA required for graduation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
- May combine two claims. 27
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-2 in the present sample was excellent (α = 0.91).
“Internal consistency in the present sample was excellent (α = 0.91).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Bond, 2011, Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire – II: a revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance, Behav Ther source
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports satisfactory AAQ-II reliability, with a mean alpha of .84 across the source paper’s samples. It does not establish α = .91 for the citing authors’ present sample; that sample-specific result must come from their own data. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire in the present sample was excellent (α = 0.92).
“Internal consistency in the present sample was excellent (α = 0.92).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Gillanders, 2014, The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire, Behav Ther source
The CFQ Psychometric Summary reports a Cronbach’s α of .92 for one of the source paper’s samples, and the text accompanying Table 5 describes the CFQ’s internal reliability across its samples as excellent. These passages do not establish internal consistency in the citing paper’s “present sample.” (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationACT for chronic pain is empirically supported by randomized controlled trials, partially controlled trials, and effectiveness studies.
“ACT for chronic pain is empirically supported by randomized control trials, [2][3][4][5][6][7] partially controlled trials, 8,9 and effectiveness studies, [10][11][12][13][14][15]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [2][3][4][5][6][7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [8] Johnston, 2010, The effectiveness of an acceptance and commitment therapy self-help intervention for chronic pain, Clin J Pain source
- cites [9] Vowles, 2009, Targeting acceptance, mindfulness, and values- based action in chronic pain: findings of two preliminary trials of an outpatient group-based intervention, Cogn Behav Pract source
- cites [10][11][12][13][14][15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in the present sample was good (α = 0.84).
“Internal consistency in the present sample was good (α = 0.84).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Kroenke, 2001, The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure, J Gen Intern Med source
The Results (Reliability and Efficiency of the PHQ-9) support good internal consistency, reporting Cronbach’s α values of 0.89 and 0.86 in the paper’s two samples. They do not support α = 0.84 for the citing study’s present sample; the paper’s 0.84 is a test–retest correlation, not Cronbach’s α. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAttendance in psychoeducation groups and length of time spent in the RCU were not predictive of graduation.
“Attendance in psychoeducation groups and length of time spent in the RCU were not predictive of graduation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared with recruits who were later separated, recruits who later graduated reported greater improvement on pain, mindfulness, depression, and anxiety.
“Compared with recruits who were later separated, recruits who later graduated reported greater improvement on pain, mindfulness, depression, and anxiety; less improvement on pain acceptance and cognitive fusion; and equivalent improvement on experiential avoidance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll pre-to post-treatment outcome measures produced significant effects, with Cohen's d effect sizes ranging from 0.41 to 0.84.
“All of the pre-to post-treatment outcome measures were significant and Cohen's d effect sizes ranged from 0.41 to 0.84.”
- Also stated in: § Pre-treatment Differences and Pre-to Posttreatment Changes · plain
“All treatment measures produced significant effects (see Table III).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Pre-treatment Differences and Pre-to Posttreatment Changes · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe logistic regression model accounted for 31% of the variance in graduation rates and correctly classified 71.5% of cases.
“This model accounted for 31% of the variance in graduation rates [χ 2 (12) = 179.13,p < 0.001, Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.31] and correctly classified 71.5% of cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTreatment completers were significantly more likely to attend psychoeducational groups, but completers who later graduated attended fewer (6.3) sessions than completers who were later separated (7.5).
“Treatment completers were significantly more likely to attend these groups, but completers who later graduated attended fewer (6.3) sessions than completers who were later separated (7.5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTreatment produced significant improvements on all outcome measures.
“Treatment was only 2 wk long, yet produced significant improvements on all outcome measures, with effect sizes of large for pain reduction, medium for pain acceptance, mindfulness, cognitive inflexibility, and depression and small for experiential avoidance and anxiety.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPsychoeducational group participation was not significantly associated with graduation, but recruits who attended two or fewer groups were more likely to graduate than those who attended more than two.
“Psychoeducational group participation was not significantly associated with graduation, but recruits who attended two or fewer groups were more likely to graduate than those who attended more than two.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most common reason for separation was MTLJ injuries (26.1%), followed by skeletal injuries (22.8%), pain (21.1%), and mental disorders (primarily adjustment disorders; 14.3%).
“The most common reason for separation was MTLJ injuries (26.1%), followed by skeletal injuries (22.8%), pain (21.1%), and mental disorders (primarily adjustment disorders; 14.3%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were no significant differences among treatment completers, attrites, and controls on the injuries and conditions that put them in the RCU, except for skeletal injuries that were more frequent for completers.
“There were no significant differences among treatment completers, attrites, and controls on the injuries and conditions that put them in RCU, except for skeletal injuries that were more frequent for completers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were 327 (47.8%) recruits who graduated and 356 (52.2%) who separated.
“There were 327 (47.8%) recruits graduated and 356 (52.2%) separated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThere were no significant differences in booster session attendance.
“Moreover, there were no significant differences in booster session attendance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth males and females in the treatment group graduated at higher rates compared with attrites and controls.
“However, both males (63.8%) and females (50.5%) in the treatment group graduated at higher rates compared with attrites (males: 38.0%; females: 30.9%) and controls (males: 50.0%; females: 41.6%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMales and recruits over age 20 years were significantly more likely to graduate.
“Males and recruits over age 20 yr were significantly more likely to graduate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere were significantly more males than females among treatment completers compared with attrites and controls.
“There were significantly more males than females among treatment completers compared with attrites and controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect sizes for pain acceptance, mindfulness, cognitive inflexibility, and depression were medium.
“medium for pain acceptance, mindfulness, cognitive inflexibility, and depression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenRecruits commonly entered MPPE within 1-4 weeks of their injuries.
“recruits commonly entered MPPE within 1-4 wk of their injuries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a significant relationship between graduation and condition/injury at transfer to the RCU, with MTLJ injuries most associated with separation.
“There was a significant relationship between graduation and condition/injury at transfer to the RCU, with MTLJ injuries most associated with separation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect sizes for experiential avoidance and anxiety were small.
“small for experiential avoidance and anxiety”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe experience of brief pain in a laboratory setting differs in many ways from pain that arises in the aftermath of a stress fracture or dislocated limb.
“However, the experience of brief pain in a laboratory setting differs in many ways from pain that arises in the aftermath of a stress fracture or dislocated limb.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency of the Pain Rating System in the present sample was good (α = 0.83).
“Internal consistency in the present sample was good (α = 0.83).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Otis, 2007 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 in the present sample was acceptable (α = 0.76).
“Internal consistency in the present sample was acceptable (α = 0.76).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Fish, 2010, Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in an Internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8, Pain source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe pressure of completing physical training requirements elevates recruits' tendency to over-evaluate and attempt to avoid, reduce, or eliminate emotional and physical discomfort.
“The pressure of completing physical training requirements in order to graduate elevates the tendency to over-evaluate and attempt to avoid, reduce, or eliminate emotional and physical discomfort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSports psychology has seen an increase in empirically supported mindfulness and acceptance approaches to enhancing athletic performance.
“Sports psychology has seen an increase in empirically supported mindfulness and acceptance approaches to enhancing athletic performance.[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised in the present sample was good (α = 0.85).
“Internal consistency in the present sample was good (α = 0.85).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Feldman, 2007, Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised (CMS-R), J Psychopathol Behav Assess source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThis study was approved by the Edward Hines VA Hospital/Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center Institutional Review Board and the Naval Services Training Command.
“This study was approved by the Edward Hines VA Hospital/ Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center Institutional Review Board and the Naval Services Training Command.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAs recruits become preoccupied with negative thoughts and unwanted sensations, they are at greater risk to engage in behaviors that diminish physical performance.
“As recruits become preoccupied with negative thoughts and unwanted sensations, they are at greater risk to engage in behaviors that diminish physical performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningObserving and allowing uncomfortable internal experiences, flexibly shifting attention into the present moment, and taking value consistent action may improve physical performance.
“In contrast, observing and allowing uncomfortable internal experiences, flexibly shifting attention into the present moment, and taking value consistent action (e.g., engaging in physical training) may improve physical performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSignificant main effects were found for length of time in RCU and number of psychoeducational groups attended.
“Significant main effects were found for length of time in RCU [F(2, 680) = 22.62, p < 0.001] and number of psychoeducational groups attended [Welch's F(2, 300.40) = 46.25,p < 0.001].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataResults supported the use of MPPE for helping recruits recover from injuries and successfully pass physical training requirements for graduation.
“Results supported the use of this program for helping recruits recover from injuries and successfully pass physical training requirements for graduation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningRecruits could enter MPPE any time while in the RCU, so the lowest and highest pain ratings they reported during medical appointments could have been before, during, or after their participation in MPPE.
“Recruits could enter MPPE any time while in the RCU, so the lowest and highest pain ratings they reported during medical appointments could have been before, during, or after their participation in MPPE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenPain ratings collected on medical visits were limited to physical pain, whereas the PRS used in MPPE includes items on emotional pain associated with physical pain.
“Also, whereas pain ratings collected on medical visits were limited to physical pain, the PRS used in MPPE includes items on emotional pain associated with physical pain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenRecruits who dropped out may have been distinctly different from the recruits who stayed on unknown factors predictive of graduation.
“But those recruits who dropped out may have been distinctly different from the recruits who stayed on unknown factors predictive of graduation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThere was a higher percentage of males in the treatment group (58.3%) than in attrition (48.1%) or control (46.5%) groups, χ2(2, n=683)=8.12, p<0.02.
“However, there was a higher percentage of males in the treatment group (58.3%) than in attrition (48.1%) or control (46.5%) groups, χ 2 (2, n = 683) = 8.12, p < 0.02.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTreatment completers were in the RCU significantly longer and attended significantly more psychoeducational groups than attrites and controls.
“Treatment completers were in the RCU significantly longer and attended significantly more psychoeducational groups than attrites and controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThere could be particular characteristics about recruits who chose to participate in treatment that might limit the conclusions drawn.
“There could be particular characteristics about those recruits who chose to participate in treatment that might limit the conclusions drawn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Seven-Item in the present sample was good (α = 0.89).
“Internal consistency in the present sample was good (α = 0.89).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Spitzer, 2006, A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder, Arch Intern Med source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThere were no significant differences among groups on age and race.
“There were no significant differences among groups on age and race.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe treatment sample in this study differed from participants in ACT for chronic pain trials on age (average 21 years), motivation, and the absence or reduced incidence of disqualifying medical and mental health conditions.
“The treatment sample in this study also differed from participants in ACT for chronic pain trials on factors such as age (i.e., average age in the current study was 21 yr), motivation (e.g., receiving treatment that could help them graduate), and the absence or reduced incidence of disqualifying medical and mental health conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Participants in ACT for chronic pain studies report duration of pain generally ranging from 1 10 to 15 5 years.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRecruits who entered treatment may have already had higher pain tolerance, greater resiliency, or stronger motivation to pass the PFA and graduate.
“Recruits who entered treatment may have already had higher pain tolerance, greater resiliency, or stronger motivation to pass the PFA and graduate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThere were no significant differences among groups on week of training at time of transfer to RCU, transfer from FIT, or pain ratings.
“There were no significant differences among groups on week of training at time of transfer to RCU, transfer from FIT, or pain ratings (i.e., pain rated on a scale of 0-10; see Table I).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataRecruits were not randomly assigned to treatment, limiting the interpretation of outcomes.
“Recruits were not randomly assigned to treatment, thus limiting the interpretation of outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
About 50-60% of injured recruits who are pulled from training will eventually be separated and sent home.
“About 50-60% of these recruits will eventually be separated out and sent home.”
“The length of time on hold from training can range from a week to a few months; 50-60% are ultimately separated (i.e., sent home.)”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no published treatment studies on ACT for acute pain (lasting 2-6 wk) or subacute pain (lasting 7-12 wk).
“but there are no published treatment studies on acute pain (e.g., lasting 2-6 wk) or subacute pain (e.g., lasting 7-12 wk).”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no published studies on psychological treatment for pain or performance enhancement in Navy recruits.
“There are no published studies on psychological treatment for pain or performance enhancement in Navy recruits.”
The paper relies on this without support.
US Navy recruits undergoing rigorous physical training are at risk of becoming overwhelmed by negative thoughts, emotions, and bodily states.
“US Navy recruits undergoing rigorous physical training are at a risk of becoming overwhelmed by negative thoughts, emotions, and bodily states.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no published studies on mindfulness and acceptance-based treatment for people in the acute or subacute phases of pain following an injury.
“The current study was unique in that there are no published studies on mindfulness and acceptance-based treatment for people in the acute or subacute phases of pain following an injury.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many recruits come to boot camp in unsatisfactory physical shape.
“Many recruits come to boot camp in unsatisfactory physical shape.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Injuries may not be discovered until recruits are in FIT.
“Unfortunately, injuries may not be discovered until recruits are in FIT.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The current study represents the first time that a behavioral intervention was implemented to assist these recruits and reduce attrition.
“The current study represents the first time that a behavioral intervention was implemented to assist these recruits and reduce attrition.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participants in ACT for chronic pain studies report duration of pain generally ranging from 1 10 to 15 5 years.
“Although participants in ACT for chronic pain studies report duration of pain generally ranging from 1 10 to 15 5 years, recruits commonly entered MPPE within 1-4 wk of their injuries.”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- ConsistentF(2, 680) = 22.62reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(2, 680) = 22.62, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(2, 300.4) = 46.25reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(2, 300.40) = 46.25,p < .001”
- Consistentt(371) = 2.2reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .028
“t (371) = 2.20, p < .05”
- Consistentt(231.9) = 2.07reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .040
“t (231.9)= 2.07, p < .05”
- Consistentt(231) = 1.19reported p > .05 · recomputed p = .235
“t (231) = 1.19, p > .05”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Attrite MTLJ subcategory percentage is overstated
MinorIn Table II, seven of 131 attrites is 5.3%, not the 5.5% shown for the MTLJ "Other" category.
Reported 5.5 · recomputed 5.343511
“Other 7 (2.9%) 7 (5.5%)7 (2.2%)”
Shin-splint separation percentage does not match its count
MinorTable IV lists 101 separations in the treatment group. Nine of 101 is 8.9%, not 7.9%.
Reported 7.9 · recomputed 8.910891
“Shin splints 9 (7.9%) 6 (7.0%) 17 (10.1%)”
Attrite MTLJ percentage does not match its count
MinorTable II gives 131 attrites and 46 with MTLJ conditions. That is 35.1%, rather than 34.4%.
Reported 34.4 · recomputed 35.114504
“MTLJ 63 (26.0%) 46 (34.4%) 98 (31.6%)”
Medical-clearance percentage uses the wrong denominator
MinorThe text identifies 131 attrites. Eighteen of 131 is 13.7%, not 14.6%.
Reported 14.6 · recomputed 13.740458
“18 (14.6%)were medically cleared back to training”
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267 · see citing works
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765 · see citing works
An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.893 · Cited by 14,407 · see citing works
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. (2011) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t00742-000 · Cited by 7,535 · see citing works
An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis
Agresti, A. (2006) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/0470114754 · Cited by 6,697 · see citing works
Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007 · Cited by 3,950 · see citing works
Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8 · Cited by 1,630 · see citing works
Acceptance and commitment therapy.
Hayes, S. C., & Lillis, J. (2012) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/17335-000 · Cited by 1,543 · see citing works
The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire
Gillanders, D. T., Bolderston, H., Bond, F. W., Dempster, M., Flaxman, P. E., Campbell, L., Kerr, S., Tansey, L., Noel, P., Ferenbach, C., et al. (2014) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Wetherell, J. L., Afari, N., Rutledge, T., Sorrell, J. T., Stoddard, J. A., Petkus, A. J., Solomon, B. C., Lehman, D. H., Liu, L., Lang, A. J., et al. (2011) · PAIN · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.05.016 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Choi, S. W., Schalet, B., Cook, K. F., & Cella, D. (2014) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0035768 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Type I Error Rate Comparisons of Post Hoc Procedures for I j Chi-Square Tables
MacDonald, P. L., & Gardner, R. C. (2000) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131640021970871 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
The Psychology of Enhancing Human Performance: The Mindfulness-Acceptance-Commitment (MAC) Approach
Gardner, F. L., & Moore, Z. E. (2007) · doi:10.1891/9780826103369 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
The effects of brief mindfulness meditation training on experimentally induced pain
Zeidan, F., Gordon, N. S., Merchant, J., & Goolkasian, P. (2010) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.015 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Kaufman, K. A., Glass, C. R., & Arnkoff, D. B. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jcsp.3.4.334 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Fish, R. A., McGuire, B., Hogan, M., Morrison, T. G., & Stewart, I. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.016 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
McCracken, L. M., & Gutiérrez-Martínez, O. (2011) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.02.004 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Buhrman, M., Skoglund, A., Husell, J., Bergström, K., Gordh, T., Hursti, T., Bendelin, N., Furmark, T., & Andersson, G. (2013) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2013.02.010 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Kee, Y. H., & John Wang, C. K. (2008) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.07.001 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Trompetter, H. R., Bohlmeijer, E. T., Veehof, M. M., & Schreurs, K. M. G. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-014-9579-0 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Mindfulness and acceptance approaches in sport performance
Bernier, M., Thienot, E., Codron, R., & Fournier, J. F. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jcsp.3.4.320 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Acceptance and commitment therapy for fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial.
Wicksell, R. K., Kemani, M., Jensen, K., Kosek, E., Kadetoff, D., Sorjonen, K., Ingvar, M., & Olsson, G. L. (2013) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00224.x · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Wicksell, R. K., Ahlqvist, J., Bring, A., Melin, L., & Olsson, G. L. (2008) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506070802078970 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
The Psychology of Enhancing Human Performance: The Mindfulness-Acceptance-Commitment (Mac) Approach
Gardner, F. L., & Moore, Z. E. (2007) · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Comparison between an acceptance-based and a cognitive- control-based protocol for coping with pain
Gutiérrez, O., Luciano, C., Rodríguez, M., & Fink, B. C. (2004) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80019-4 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Differential effects on pain intensity and unpleasantness of two meditation practices.
Perlman, D. M., Salomons, T. V., Davidson, R. J., & Lutz, A. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0018440 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Thompson, R. W., Kaufman, K. A., De Petrillo, L. A., Glass, C. R., & Arnkoff, D. B. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jcsp.5.2.99 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Masedo, A. I., & Rosa Esteve, M. (2007) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.02.006 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Vowles, K. E., McCracken, L. M., & O’Brien, J. Z. (2011) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.08.002 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
De Petrillo, L. A., Kaufman, K. A., Glass, C. R., & Arnkoff, D. B. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jcsp.3.4.357 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Vowles, K. E., Wetherell, J. L., & Sorrell, J. T. (2009) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2008.08.001 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
The Effectiveness of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Self-help Intervention for Chronic Pain.
Johnston, M., Foster, M., Shennan, J., Starkey, N. J., & Johnson, A. (2010) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e3181cf59ce · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Thorsell, J., Finnes, A., Dahl, J., Lundgren, T., Gybrant, M., Gordh, T., & Buhrman, M. (2011) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e318219a933 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Sappington, R., & Longshore, K. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jcsp.2014-0017 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Mallard, T. T., & Schumann, M. (2014) · Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/cns0000022 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Scott, W., Hann, K. E. J., & McCracken, L. M. (2016) · Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy · doi:10.1007/s10879-016-9328-5 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
McCracken, L. M., Barker, E., & Chilcot, J. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-014-9570-9 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Zhang, C.-Q., Si, G., Duan, Y., Lyu, Y., Keatley, D. A., & Chan, D. K. C. (2016) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.09.005 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Evans, D. R., Eisenlohr‐Moul, T. A., Button, D. F., Baer, R. A., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2014) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12196 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Managing Chronic Pain: Workbook: A Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Approach
Otis, J. (2007) · doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780195329179.001.0001 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
A comparison of the effect of mindfulness and relaxation on responses to acute experimental pain.
Sharpe, L., Nicholson Perry, K., Rogers, P., Refshauge, K., & Nicholas, M. K. (2013) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00241.x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Baranoff, J. A., Hanrahan, S. J., Burke, A. L. J., & Connor, J. P. (2016) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-015-9496-9 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Cosio, D., & Schafer, T. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-015-9647-0 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Carrasquillo, N., & Zettle, R. D. (2014) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-014-0074-3 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blakey, S. M., Halverson, T. F., Evans, M. K., Patel, T. A., Hair, L. P., Meyer, E. C., DeBeer, B. B., Beckham, J. C., Pugh, M. J., Calhoun, P. S., et al. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.033 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Écija, C., Catalá, P., López‐Gómez, I., Bedmar, D., & Peñacoba, C. (2021) · Clinical Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/10547738211034307 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“fibromyalgia, cognitive fusion, pain acceptance, activity avoidance, excessive persistence thoughts and emotions become (Hülsebusch et al., 2016; Udell et al., 2018).”
Backgroundpsychological flexibility training to enhance resilience in military personnel
Evans, W. R., Meyer, E. C., Moore, B. A., & Peterson, A. L. (2024) · Journal of Military Social Work and Behavioral Health Services · doi:10.1080/21635781.2023.2246900 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Even inside operational contexts, mindfulness and other centering strategies have been employed to decrease attrition resulting from training injuries (Udell et al., 2018) and decrease attentional lapses over high-demand intervals (Jha et al., 2015).”
The role of mindfulness and resilience in Navy SEAL training
Ledford, A. K., Luning, C. R., Dixon, D. P., Miles, P. C., & Lynch, S. M. (2022) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995605.2022.2062973 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…has linked the presence of resilience to performance (e.g., Fletcher & Sarkar, 2012; Sarkar & Fletcher, 2014), turnover intentions (e.g., Smith, Emerson et al., 2020), lower attrition (e.g., Udell et al., 2018), and retention (e.g., Doney, 2013; A. K. Ledford et al., 2020; Underdahl et al., 2018).”
BackgroundResultKarimi, M., Thani, F. N., Naqhsh, Z., & Ghazaghi, T. (2022) · Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.5812/ijpbs.107467 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Sanduvete-Chaves, S., Chacón-Moscoso, S., & Cano-García, F. J. (2024) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111888 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Experiential Avoidance, Pain, and Suicide Risk in a National Sample of Gulf War Veterans
Grove, J. L., Young, J. R., Chen, Z., Blakey, S. M., Beckham, J. C., Calhoun, P. S., Dedert, E. A., Goldston, D. B., Pugh, M. J., & Kimbrel, N. A. (2022) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2022.2160681 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Wang, J.-Q., Wang, X.-Z., & Wang, W.-X. (2025) · World Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.100959 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Introduction to Acceptance and Commitment Practices
Holland, M. L., Brock, S. E., Oren, T., & van Eckhardt, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83492-0_2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pendekatan-Pendekatan Untuk Meningkatkan Resiliensi Pasca Pandemi Covid-19
Hanggara, G. S., Irawan, R. H., Indrawati, E. M., Badaruzzaman, A., & Prasetyo, A. (2023) · PINUS Jurnal Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran · doi:10.29407/pn.v8i1.19054 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-evaluation of Health State in Chinese Navy of Different FleetsPreprint
Ding, Y., Wu, S., Wang, H., et al. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-87059/v1
Wirmando, W., Alfrida, A., Saranga', J. L., Sampe, A., Bakri, A., & Kadang, Y. (2022) · Jurnal kesehatan komunitas (Journal of community health) · doi:10.25311/keskom.vol8.iss3.1344
R2MR: An evaluation of pre-post training data across cohorts
Wood, V. M., Bailey, S., & Guest, K. (2026) · Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health · doi:10.3138/jmvfh-2025-0092
Dredge, G. F., Hoch, J. M., Benedict, T., Gregg, B. T., Judkins, J. L., & Heebner, N. R. (2026) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2026.2720530
- Authors
- Udell, C. J., Ruddy, J. L., & Procento, P. M.
- Affiliations
- Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center (US)
- Venue
- Military Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-03-06
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- e603-e611
- ISSN
- 0026-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-613X
- OpenAlex
- W2789762412
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Military Medicine (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- U.S. Navy
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, military recruits, injury recovery, pain acceptance, mindfulness, physical performance, resilience, experiential avoidance, cognitive inflexibility, naval recruits, pain management, anxiety, depression, predictors of treatment dropout, predictors of treatment completion, predictors of treatment response
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Teaching, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review