The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direction of Fit
Abstract
In her seminal presentation of the distinction between what have since come widely to be called two "directions of fit", Anscombe described a man going shopping with a shopping list while being tailed by a private detective listing the man's purchases, and asked what distinguishes the shopping list from the detec-tive's list. She answered the question thus: It is precisely this: if the list and the things that the man actually buys do not agree, and if this and this alone constitutes a mistake, then the mis-take is not in the list but in the man's performance (...) whereas if the detective's record and what the man actually buys do not agree, then the mistake is in the record. (Anscombe, 1957, p. 56) The "direction of fit " terminology actually antedates Anscombe's monograph, as we'll see in a moment, though not for marking quite the distinction to which she drew attention; for a nice example of its use in this capacity, we may quote from
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parfit, D. (1986) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/019824908x.001.0001 · Cited by 5,045
Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism
Millikan, R. G. (1984) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4124.001.0001 · Cited by 4,758
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.
Velleman, J. D., & Bratman, M. E. (1991) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185304 · Cited by 2,384
Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language.
Peacocke, C., & Kripke, S. A. (1984) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184586 · Cited by 1,427
The Logic of Conditionals: An Application of Probability to Deductive Logic
Adams, E. W. (1975) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7622-2 · Cited by 1,196
The Humean Theory of Motivation
SMITH, M. (1987) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/xcvi.381.36 · Cited by 1,005
Lamarque, P., & Searle, J. (1982) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2960084 · Cited by 939
Goldman, A. I. (1967) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2024268 · Cited by 925
Stich, S. (1990) · Cited by 516
Velleman, J. D. (1992) · Noûs · doi:10.2307/2215684 · Cited by 420
Cited by
Stability and Justification in Hume's Treatise
Loeb, L. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0195146581.001.0001 · Cited by 279
Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study
Livingston, P. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199278067.001.0001 · Cited by 276
Action is enabled by systematic misrepresentations
Wiese, W. (2017) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-016-9867-x · Cited by 60
Nanay, B. (2026) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70258
“The concept of “direction of fit” has played an important role in philosophy of mind in the last half century (Anscombe, 1957; Searle, 1983; Smith, 1987; Humberstone, 1992; Shea, 2018; Butlin, 2021; Nanay, in print).”
Metadata
- Authors
- HUMBERSTONE, I. L.
- Venue
- Mind
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 401
- Pages
- 59-84
- ISSN
- 0026-4423 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2113
- OpenAlex
- W2109304724
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direction of Fit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mind/101.401.59
- The paper
- HUMBERSTONE, I. L. (1992). Direction of Fit. Mind. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/101.401.59
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.